The Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Why and How?

Abstract

Treatment of patients with intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is a controversial area. Many therapeutic options exist, and deciding on appropriate treatment can be difficult. In addition, multiple specialties are often involved in the care of PE patients. To better organize the response to serious PE patients, several hospitals and academic centers throughout the world have created pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs). The goal of a PERT is to have a single multidisciplinary team of experts in thromboembolic disease, who can respond rapidly to patients with acute PE, and offer consultation and implementation of the full spectrum of therapeutic options. PERT teams were modeled after rapid response teams and are meant to generate a prompt, patient-specific plan for patients with PE without having to consult multiple individual specialists. Data are emerging demonstrating the value of PERTs in reducing hospital length of stay and, possibly, patient outcomes.

Keywords

pulmonary embolism - multidisciplinary team - pulmonary embolism response teams - venous thromboembolism

Publication History

Article published online:
16 February 2021

• References

• 1 Provias T, Dudzinski DM, Jaff MR. et al. The Massachusetts General Hospital Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (MGH PERT): creation of a multidisciplinary program to improve care of patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Hosp Pract (1995) 2014; 42 (01) 31-37
• 2 Winters BD, Weaver SJ, Pfoh ER, Yang T, Pham JC, Dy SM. Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158 (5 Pt 2): 417-425
• 3 DeVita MA, Winters B. It's not “do” but “why do” rapid response systems work?*. Crit Care Med 2014; 42 (09) 2133-2134
• 4 Jasuja S, Channick RN. Post-intensive care unit follow-up of pulmonary embolism. Crit Care Clin 2020; 36 (03) 561-570
• 5 Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K. et al; PERT Consortium. Diagnosis, treatment and follow up of acute pulmonary embolism: consensus practice from the PERT Consortium. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2019; 25: 1076029619853037
• 6 Kabrhel C, Rosovsky R, Channick R. et al. A multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team: initial 30-month experience with a novel approach to delivery of care to patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism. Chest 2016; 150 (02) 384-393
• 7 Carroll BJ, Beyer SE, Mehegan T. et al. Changes in care for acute pulmonary embolism through a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team. Am J Med 2020; 133 (11) 1313-1321.e6
• 8 Xenos ES, Davis GA, He Q, Green A, Smyth SS. The implementation of a pulmonary embolism response team in the management of intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019; 7 (04) 493-500
• 9 Myc LA, Solanki JN, Barros AJ. et al. Adoption of a dedicated multidisciplinary team is associated with improved survival in acute pulmonary embolism. Respir Res 2020; 21 (01) 159
• 10 Rosovsky R, Chang Y, Rosenfield K. et al. Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 47 (01) 31-40
• 11 Chaudhury P, Gadre SK, Schneider E. et al. Impact of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team availability on management and outcomes. Am J Cardiol 2019; 124 (09) 1465-1469
• 12 Kwok B, Brosnahan SB, Amoroso NE. et al. Pulmonary Embolism Response Team activation during the COVID-19 pandemic in a New York City Academic Hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2020; 1-9 . doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02264-8
• 13 Elbadawi A, Wright C, Patel D. et al. The impact of a multi-specialty team for high risk pulmonary embolism on resident and fellow education. Vasc Med 2018; 23 (04) 372-376