Does Use of a Feeding Protocol Change Outcomes in Gastroschisis? A Report from the Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium

Abstract

Introduction Gastroschisis feeding practices vary. Standardized neonatal feeding protocols have been demonstrated to improve nutritional outcomes. We report outcomes of infants with gastroschisis that were fed with and without a protocol.

Materials and Methods A retrospective study of neonates with uncomplicated gastroschisis at 11 children's hospitals from 2013 to 2016 was performed.

Outcomes of infants fed via institutional-specific protocols were compared with those fed without a protocol. Subgroup analyses of protocol use with immediate versus delayed closure and with sutured versus sutureless closure were conducted.

Results Among 315 neonates, protocol-based feeding was utilized in 204 (65%) while no feeding protocol was used in 111 (35%). There were less surgical site infections (SSI) in those fed with a protocol (7 vs. 16%, p = 0.019). There were no differences in TPN duration, time to initial oral intake, time to goal feeds, ventilator use, peripherally inserted central catheter line deep venous thromboses, or length of stay. Of those fed via protocol, less SSIs occurred in those who underwent sutured closure (9 vs. 19%, p = 0.026). Further analyses based on closure timing or closure method did not demonstrate any significant differences.

Conclusion Across this multi-institutional cohort of infants with uncomplicated gastroschisis, there were more SSIs in those fed without an institutional-based feeding protocol but no differences in other outcomes.

Keywords

gastroschisis - feeding protocol - neonatal feeding

Publication History

Received: 12 June 2020

Accepted: 12 October 2020

Article published online:
27 December 2020

• References

• 1 Anderson JE, Galganski LA, Cheng Y. et al. Epidemiology of gastroschisis: a population-based study in California from 1995 to 2012. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (12) 2399-2403
• 2 Youssef F, Laberge JM, Puligandla P, Emil S. Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network (CAPSNet). Determinants of outcomes in patients with simple gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2017; 52 (05) 710-714
• 3 DeUgarte DA, Calkins KL, Guner Y. et al. University of California Fetal Consortium. Adherence to and outcomes of a University-Consortium gastroschisis pathway. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55 (01) 45-48
• 4 Banyard D, Ramones T, Phillips SE, Leys CM, Rauth T, Yang EY. Method to our madness: an 18-year retrospective analysis on gastroschisis closure. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (03) 579-584
• 5 Keys C, Drewett M, Burge DM. Gastroschisis: the cost of an epidemic. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (04) 654-657
• 6 Sydorak RM, Nijagal A, Sbragia L. et al. Gastroschisis: small hole, big cost. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37 (12) 1669-1672
• 7 Gonzalez DO, Cooper JN, St Peter SD, Minneci PC, Deans KJ. Variability in outcomes after gastroschisis closure across U.S. children's hospitals. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (03) 513-520
• 8 Cameron DB, Graham DA, Milliren CE. et al. Quantifying the burden of interhospital cost variation in pediatric surgery: implications for the prioritization of comparative effectiveness research. JAMA Pediatr 2017; 171 (02) e163926
• 9 Aldrink JH, Caniano DA, Nwomeh BC. Variability in gastroschisis management: a survey of North American pediatric surgery training programs. J Surg Res 2012; 176 (01) 159-163
• 10 Lusk LA, Brown EG, Overcash RT. et al. University of California Fetal Consortium. Multi-institutional practice patterns and outcomes in uncomplicated gastroschisis: a report from the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC). J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (12) 1782-1786
• 11 Chang SY, Sevransky J, Martin GS. Protocols in the management of critical illness. Crit Care 2012; 16 (02) 306
• 12 Passaro RC, Savoie KB, Huang EY. Use of a gastroschisis feeding guideline to improve standardization of care and patient outcomes at an urban children's hospital. Nutr Clin Pract 2018; 33 (04) 545-552
• 13 Zalles-Vidal C, Peñarrieta-Daher A, Bracho-Blanchet E. et al. A Gastroschisis bundle: effects of a quality improvement protocol on morbidity and mortality. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (11) 2117-2122
• 14 McCallie KR, Lee HC, Mayer O, Cohen RS, Hintz SR, Rhine WD. Improved outcomes with a standardized feeding protocol for very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2011; 31 (Suppl. 01) S61-S67
• 15 Barr J, Hecht M, Flavin KE, Khorana A, Gould MK. Outcomes in critically ill patients before and after the implementation of an evidence-based nutritional management protocol. Chest 2004; 125 (04) 1446-1457
• 16 Berseth CL. Minimal enteral feedings. Clin Perinatol 1995; 22 (01) 195-205
• 17 McClure RJ, Newell SJ. Randomised controlled study of clinical outcome following trophic feeding. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2000; 82 (01) F29-F33
• 18 Walter-Nicolet E, Rousseau V, Kieffer F. et al. Neonatal outcome of gastroschisis is mainly influenced by nutritional management. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2009; 48 (05) 612-617
• 19 Lemoine JB, Smith RR, White D. Got milk? Effects of early enteral feedings in patients with gastroschisis. Adv Neonatal Care 2015; 15 (03) 166-175
• 20 Reigstad I, Reigstad H, Kiserud T, Berstad T. Preterm elective caesarean section and early enteral feeding in gastroschisis. Acta Paediatr 2011; 100 (01) 71-74
• 21 Driver CP, Bruce J, Bianchi A, Doig CM, Dickson AP, Bowen J. The contemporary outcome of gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35 (12) 1719-1723
• 22 Wessel JJ. Nutrition for the surgical infant with gastroschisis. Neonatal Netw 2019; 38 (01) 17-26
• 23 Haddock C, Al Maawali AG, Ting J, Bedford J, Afshar K, Skarsgard ED. Impact of multidisciplinary standardization of care for gastroschisis: Treatment, outcomes, and cost. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (05) 892-897
• 24 Fraser JD, Deans KJ, Fallat ME. et al. Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium. Sutureless vs. sutured abdominal wall closure for gastroschisis: operative characteristics and early outcomes from the Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium. J Pediatr Surg 2020; DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.02.017.