Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(06): 529-534
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1718576
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

Timing of Repeat Cesarean Delivery for Women with a Prior Classical Incision

Marwan Ma'ayeh
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Paulina Haight
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Emily A. Oliver
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Mark B. Landon
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
,
Kara M. Rood
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to compare neonatal outcomes for delivery at 36 weeks compared with 37 weeks in women with prior classical cesarean delivery (CCD).

Study Design This was a secondary analysis of the prospective observational cohort of the Eunice Kennedy National Institute for Child and Human Development's Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network Cesarean Registry. Data on cases of repeat cesarean delivery (RCD) in the setting of a prior CCD were abstracted and used for analysis. This study compared outcomes of women who delivered at 360/7 to 366/7 versus 370/7 to 376/7 weeks. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse neonatal outcomes that included neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), hypoglycemia, mechanical ventilation, sepsis, length of stay ≥5 days, and neonatal death. A composite of maternal outcomes that included uterine rupture, blood transfusion, general anesthesia, cesarean hysterectomy, venous thromboembolism, maternal sepsis, intensive care unit admission, and surgical complications was also evaluated.

Results There were 436 patients included in the analysis. Women who delivered at 36 weeks (n = 176) were compared those who delivered at 37 weeks (n = 260). There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Delivery at 37 weeks was associated with a reduction in composite neonatal morbidity (24 vs. 34%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.61 [0.31–0.94]), including a decrease in NICU admission rates (20 vs. 29%, aOR = 0.63 [0.40–0.99]), hospitalization ≥5 days (13 vs. 24%, aOR = 0.48 [0.29–0.8]), and RDS or TTN (9 vs. 19%, aOR = 0.43 [0.24–0.77]). There was no difference in adverse maternal outcomes (7 vs. 7%, aOR = 0.98 [0.46–2.09]).

Conclusion Delivery at 37 weeks for women with a history of prior CCD is associated with a decrease in adverse neonatal outcomes, compared with delivery at 36 weeks.

Key Points

  • Classical cesarean section may have increased risk of uterine rupture in future pregnancies.

  • This study compares outcomes of delivery at 370/7 to 376/7 versus 360/7 to 366/7 weeks.

  • Delivery at 370/7 to 376/7 weeks was associated with decreased neonatal morbidity.

Note

This study was presented as poster at SMFM Annual Meeting 2020 (Poster Number 222).




Publication History

Received: 21 July 2020

Accepted: 07 September 2020

Article published online:
14 October 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. et al; Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (25) 2581-2589
  • 2 Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Wiggs CD, Barrilleaux PS, Martin Jr JN. Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100 (5 Pt 1): 946-950
  • 3 Moramarco V, Korale Liyanage S, Ninan K, Mukerji A, McDonald SD. Classical caesarean: what are the maternal and infant risks compared with low transverse caesarean in preterm birth, and subsequent uterine rupture risks? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2020; 42 (02) 179-197.e3
  • 4 Patterson LS, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. Maternal and perinatal morbidity associated with classic and inverted T cesarean incisions. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100 (04) 633-637
  • 5 Nicholson SC, Brown ADG, MacPherson HM, Liston WA. ‘Classical’ caesarean section at or near term in the morbidly obese obstetric patient. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 22 (06) 691
  • 6 Kawakita T, Reddy UM, Grantz KL, Landy HJ, Desale S, Iqbal SN. Maternal outcomes associated with early preterm cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (03) 312.e1-312.e9
  • 7 Wen SW, Huang L, Liston R. Maternal Health Study Group, Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. et al; Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 1991-2001. CMAJ 2005; 173 (07) 759-764
  • 8 Chauhan SP, Martin Jr. JN, Henrichs CE, Morrison JC, Magann EF. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189 (02) 408-417
  • 9 Halperin ME, Moore DC, Hannah WJ. Classical versus low-segment transverse incision for preterm caesarean section: Maternal complications and outcome of subsequent pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1989; 44 (06) 454-455
  • 10 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 764: medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (02) e151-e155
  • 11 Stotland NE, Lipschitz LS, Caughey AB. Delivery strategies for women with a previous classic cesarean delivery: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187 (05) 1203-1208
  • 12 Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Gilbert S, Landon MB. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. et al; Risk of uterine rupture and placenta accreta with prior uterine surgery outside of the lower segment. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (06) 1332-1337
  • 13 Tita ATN, Landon MB, Spong CY. Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. et al; Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (02) 111-120
  • 14 Ananth CV, Friedman AM, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Epidemiology of moderate preterm, late preterm and early term delivery. Clin Perinatol 2013; 40 (04) 601-610
  • 15 Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. et al; The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (3 Pt 2): 1016-1023
  • 16 Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Moran C, Benjamin DK. et al. Early and late onset sepsis in late preterm infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009; 28 (12) 1052-1056
  • 17 Blondon M, Casini A, Hoppe KK, Boehlen F, Righini M, Smith NL. Risks of venous thromboembolism after cesarean sections: a meta-analysis. Chest 2016; 150 (03) 572-596
  • 18 Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Bruckner TA, Halloran DR, Caughey AB. Perinatal morbidity associated with late preterm deliveries compared with deliveries between 37 and 40 weeks of gestation. BJOG 2011; 118 (12) 1446-1454
  • 19 Baumert M, Fiala M, Walencka Z, Paprotny M, Sypniewska K. Cesarean delivery and respiratory distress in late preterm and term infants. Cent Eur J Med 2012; 7 (02) 230-234
  • 20 Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Thom EA, Blackwell SC. NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. et al; Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (14) 1311-1320
  • 21 Räikkönen K, Gissler M, Kajantie E. Associations between maternal antenatal corticosteroid treatment and mental and behavioral disorders in children. JAMA 2020; 323 (19) 1924-1933