Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37(02): 111-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714427
Original Article

Perforator Mapping Practice for Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Reconstructions: A Survey of the Benelux Region

Vivian B. Boer 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
,
Jan J. van Wingerden 
2   Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Carolien F. Wever
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
,
Michiel R. Beets
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
,
Pauline D. Verhaegen
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
,
Moustapha Hamdi
4   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brussels University Hospital, Vrij Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Numerous new and novel imaging techniques for preoperative perforator selection in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap planning have been introduced. To what extent, these have been adopted into or replaced routine practice has hitherto remained unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the currently preferred technique by reconstructive surgeons, the criteria that they regard as most relevant and what impact these have on the preoperative decision-making.

Methods An online survey consisting of 25 questions was sent to members of the Benelux Societies for Plastic Surgery. Information regarding experience and preferred imaging modality was requested. Specific questions addressed the utilization of computed tomography angiography (CTA) and factors that could inform preoperative perforator selection. Results were anonymously collected, managed using REDCap, and analyzed using Chi-square statistic.

Results Seventy-nine principal surgeons could be included. A variation in surgeon experience was observed. On CTA, the preferred imaging modality, large-caliber vessels, the location of the perforator in the flap, and its intramuscular course were considered the most significant criteria. Surgeons doing more than 20 DIEP flaps per year are less concerned about the distance of the perforator from the umbilicus (p = 0.003) but more likely to choose a medial perforator (p = 0.011). No statistical difference was found in surgeons' experience between those who would choose and use one specific (medial or lateral) perforator when they are analogous on CTA, and those who would delay the decision until both perforators have been exposed.

Conclusion Advantages and disadvantages of the current practice of preoperative perforator selection by surgeons who are primarily responsible for harvesting a DIEP flap have been clearly identified. Indications are that these could be widely representative in which case, the quest for a protocol or modality that maximizes the benefit and minimizes harm in preoperative perforator mapping is urgently required.

Keywords

breast reconstruction - DIEP - perforator - mapping - survey


Publication History

Received: 06 April 2020

Accepted: 16 June 2020

Article published online:
29 July 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Damen TH, Timman R, Kunst EH. et al. High satisfaction rates in women after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (01) 93-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Martinez CA, Reis SM, Rednam R, Boutros SG. The outpatient DIEP: Safety and viability following a modified recovery protocol. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (09) e1898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Matros E, Albornoz CR, Razdan SN. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (04) 937-946
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wade RG, Watford J, Wormald JCR, Bramhall RJ, Figus A. Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (04) 468-477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68 (06) 394-424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42 (06) 645-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Healy C, Allen Sr RJ. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (02) 121-125
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Weum S, Mercer JB, de Weerd L. Evaluation of dynamic infrared thermography as an alternative to CT angiography for perforator mapping in breast reconstruction: a clinical study. BMC Med Imaging 2016; 16 (01) 43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yang X, Miller MJ, Friel HT, Slijepcevic A, Knopp MV. Perforator phase contrast angiography of deep inferior epigastric perforators: a better preoperative imaging tool for flap surgery than computed tomographic angiography?. Invest Radiol 2017; 52 (06) 334-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pisana F, Haubenreisser H, Henzler T, Schönberg S, Kachelrieß M. Singular value-guided similarity filter improves detection of vessels in low-dose dynamic CT angiography: application to DIEP flap studies. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63 (16) 165003
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Cina A, Salgarello M, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P, Bonomo L. Planning breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforating vessels: multidetector CT angiography versus color Doppler US. Radiology 2010; 255 (03) 979-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rozen WM, Garcia-Tutor E, Alonso-Burgos A. et al. Planning and optimising DIEP flaps with virtual surgery: the Navarra experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (02) 289-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Whetzel TP, Huang V. The vascular anatomy of the tendinous intersections of the rectus abdominis muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (01) 83-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Boer VB, van Wingerden JJ, Wever CF. et al. Concordance between preoperative computed tomography angiographic mapping and intraoperative perforator selection for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions. Gland Surg 2017; 6 (06) 620-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Klasson S, Svensson H, Malm K, Wassélius J, Velander P. Preoperative CT angiography versus Doppler ultrasound mapping of abdominal perforator in DIEP breast reconstructions: A randomized prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (06) 782-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Seth AK, Koolen PGL, Sultan SM, Lee BT, Erhard HA, Greenspun DT. Unilateral autologous breast reconstruction with bi-pedicled, conjoined deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (02) 145-155
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cho MJ, Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Clinical decision making using CTA in conjoined, bipedicled DIEP and SIEA for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 241-246
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kamali P, Lee M, Becherer BE. et al. Medial row perforators are associated with higher rates of fat necrosis in bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 140 (01) 19-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Laporta R, Longo B, Sorotos M, Farcomeni A, Amorosi V, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Time-dependent factors in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (07) 793-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Daly LT, Doval AF, Lin SJ, Tobias A, Lee BT, Dowlatshahi AS. Role of CTA in women with abdominal scars undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction: Review of 1,187 flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (04) 294-300
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 2000; 60: 821-836
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar