Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2022; 35(03): 294-298
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713736
Original Article

Tibial Spine Location Influences Tibial Tunnel Placement in Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Takanori Iriuchishima
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kamimoku Spa Hospital, Gunma, Japan
,
Bunsei Goto
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kamimoku Spa Hospital, Gunma, Japan
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of tibial spine location on tibial tunnel placement in anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). A total of 39 patients undergoing anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study (30 females and 9 males; average age: 29 ± 15.2 years). In anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction, the tibial and femoral tunnels were created close to the anteromedial bundle insertion site using a transportal technique. Using postoperative 3D-CT, accurate axial views of the tibia plateau were evaluated. By assuming the medial and anterior borders of the tibia plateau as 0% and the lateral and posterior borders as 100%, the location of the medial and lateral tibial spine, and the center of the tibial tunnel were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the correlation between tibial spine location and tibial tunnel placement. The medial tibial spine was located at 54.7 ± 4.5% from the anterior border and 41.3 ± 3% from the medial border. The lateral tibial spine was located at 58.7 ± 5.1% from the anterior border and 55.3 ± 2.8% from the medial border. The ACL tibial tunnel was located at 34.8 ± 7.7% from the anterior border and 48.2 ± 3.4% from the medial border. Mediolateral tunnel placement was significantly correlated with medial and lateral tibial spine location. However, for anteroposterior tunnel placement, no significant correlation was found. A significant correlation was observed between mediolateral ACL tibial tunnel placement and medial and lateral tibial spine location. For clinical relevance, tibial ACL tunnel placement might be unintentionally influenced by tibial spine location. Confirmation of the ACL footprint is required to create accurate anatomical tunnels during surgery. This is a Level III; case–control study.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament - tunnel placement - anatomy - tibia - tibial spine


Publication History

Received: 10 January 2020

Accepted: 25 May 2020

Article published online:
08 July 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Darcy SP, Kilger RH, Woo SL, Debski RE. Estimation of ACL forces by reproducing knee kinematics between sets of knees: a novel non-invasive methodology. J Biomech 2006; 39 (13) 2371-2377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH. Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (11) 1218-1225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harner CD, Baek GH, Vogrin TM, Carlin GJ, Kashiwaguchi S, Woo SL. Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. Arthroscopy 1999; 15 (07) 741-749
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Iriuchishima T, Ryu K, Aizawa S, Fu FH. Size correlation between the tibial anterior cruciate ligament footprint and the tibia plateau. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (04) 1147-1152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Iriuchishima T, Ryu K, Aizawa S, Fu FH. The difference in centre position in the ACL femoral footprint inclusive and exclusive of the fan-like extension fibres. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (01) 254-259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Tajima G. et al. Evaluation of the tunnel placement in the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (09) 1226-1231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Iriuchishima T, Shirakura K, Fu FH. Graft impingement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (03) 664-670
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Iriuchishima T, Ryu K, Aizawa S, Fu FH. Proportional evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint size and knee bony morphology. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (11) 3157-3162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kopf S, Musahl V, Tashman S, Szczodry M, Shen W, Fu FH. A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (03) 213-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lansdown D, Ma CB. The influence of tibial and femoral bone morphology on knee kinematics in the anterior cruciate ligament injured knee. Clin Sports Med 2018; 37 (01) 127-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Levins JG, Sturnick DR, Argentieri EC. et al. Geometric risk factors associated with noncontact anterior cruciate ligament graft rupture. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (10) 2537-2545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Luites JW, Wymenga AB, Blankevoort L, Kooloos JG. Description of the attachment geometry of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL from arthroscopic perspective for anatomical tunnel placement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (12) 1422-1431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, Debandi A. et al. Evaluation of rotational instability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using triaxial accelerometer: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (08) 1233-1238
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T. et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (06) 618-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N. et al. Rectangular tunnel double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft to mimic natural fiber arrangement. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (10) 1178-1183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement--a cadaver study. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (05) 585-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (02) 154-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sturnick DR, Argentieri EC, Vacek PM. et al. A decreased volume of the medial tibial spine is associated with an increased risk of suffering an anterior cruciate ligament injury for males but not females. J Orthop Res 2014; 32 (11) 1451-1457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 van Eck CF, Kopf S, van Dijk CN, Fu FH, Tashman S. Comparison of 3-dimensional notch volume between subjects with and subjects without anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Arthroscopy 2011; 27 (09) 1235-1241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wolf MR, Murawski CD, van Diek FM, van Eck CF, Huang Y, Fu FH. Intercondylar notch dimensions and graft failure after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 680-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wu E, Chen M, Cooperman D, Victoroff B, Goodfellow D, Farrow LD. No correlation of height or gender with anterior cruciate ligament footprint size. J Knee Surg 2011; 24 (01) 39-43
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, Debski RE, Fu FH, Woo SL. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (05) 660-666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kawaguchi Y, Kondo E, Takeda R, Akita K, Yasuda K, Amis AA. The role of fibers in the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament in resisting tibial displacement. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (03) 435-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fu FH, van Eck CF, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Moreland MS. Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a changing paradigm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (03) 640-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (09) 1675-1687
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ahn JH, Jeong HJ, Ko CS, Ko TS, Kim JH. Three-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography evaluation of tunnel location during single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques. Clin Orthop Surg 2013; 5 (01) 26-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Driscoll MD, Isabell Jr GP, Conditt MA. et al. Comparison of 2 femoral tunnel locations in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 2012; 28 (10) 1481-1489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Karlsson J, Irrgang JJ, van Eck CF, Samuelsson K, Mejia HA, Fu FH. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 2: clinical application of surgical technique. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (09) 2016-2026
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kato Y, Maeyama A, Lertwanich P. et al. Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (04) 816-823
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nha KW, Han JH, Kwon JH, Kang KW, Park HJ, Song JG. Anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a freehand transtibial technique. Knee Surg Relat Res 2015; 27 (02) 117-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Youm YS, Cho SD, Lee SH, Youn CH. Modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique in anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of femoral tunnel position and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (12) 2941-2947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lee KW, Hwang YS, Chi YJ, Yang DS, Kim HY, Choy WS. Anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by low accessory anteromedial portal technique: an in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Relat Res 2014; 26 (02) 97-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Oka S, Schuhmacher P, Brehmer A, Traut U, Kirsch J, Siebold R. Histological analysis of the tibial anterior cruciate ligament insertion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (03) 747-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Robin BN, Jani SS, Marvil SC, Reid JB, Schillhammer CK, Lubowitz JH. Advantages and disadvantages of transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in femoral tunnel drilling in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2015; 31 (07) 1412-1417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tashiro Y, Okazaki K, Uemura M. et al. Comparison of transtibial and transportal techniques in drilling femoral tunnels during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CAD models. Open Access J Sports Med 2014; 5: 65-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S. Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 2011; 39 (08) 1789-1799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tensho K, Shimodaira H, Aoki T. et al. Bony landmarks of the anterior cruciate ligament tibial footprint: a detailed analysis comparing 3-dimensional computed tomography images to visual and histological evaluations. Am J Sports Med 2014; 42 (06) 1433-1440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar