Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2022; 35(01): 078-082
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1712984
Original Article

Transitioning a Practice to Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Correlated with Favorable Short-Term Clinical Outcomes—A Single Surgeon Experience

Connor A. King 
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
,
Mark Jordan
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NorthShore University Orthopaedic and Spine Institiute, Skokie, Illinois
,
Alexander T. Bradley
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
,
Caroline Wlodarski
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NorthShore University Orthopaedic and Spine Institiute, Skokie, Illinois
,
Alexander Tauchen
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NorthShore University Orthopaedic and Spine Institiute, Skokie, Illinois
,
Lalit Puri
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NorthShore University Orthopaedic and Spine Institiute, Skokie, Illinois
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background This study sought to evaluate the patient experience and short-term clinical outcomes associated with the hospital stay of patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These results were compared with a cohort of patients who underwent TKA without robotic assistance performed by the same surgeon prior to the introduction of this technology.

Materials and Methods A cohort of consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis by a single fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeon over a 39-month period was identified. Patients who underwent TKA during the year that this surgeon transitioned his entire knee arthroplasty practice to robotic assistance were excluded to eliminate selection bias and control for the learning curve. All patients received the same prosthesis and postoperative pain protocol. Patients that required intubation for failed spinal anesthetic were excluded. A final population of 492 TKAs was identified. Of these, 290 underwent TKA without robotic assistance and 202 underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA. Patient demographic characteristics and short-term clinical data were analyzed.

Results Robotic arm-assisted TKA was associated with shorter length of stay (2.3 vs. 2.6 days, p < 0.001), a 50% reduction in morphine milligram equivalent utilization (from 214 to 103, p < 0.001), and a mean increase in procedure time of 9.3 minutes (p < 0.001). There was one superficial infection in the nonrobotic cohort and there were no deep postoperative infections in either cohort. There were no manipulations under anesthesia in the robotic cohort while there were six in the nonrobotic cohort. Additionally, there were no significant differences in emergency department visits, readmissions, or return to the operating room.

Conclusion This analysis corroborates existing literature suggesting that robotic arm-assisted TKA can be correlated with improved short-term clinical outcomes. This study reports on a single surgeon's experience with regard to analgesic requirements, length of stay, pain scores, and procedure time following a complete transition to robotic arm-assisted TKA. These results underscore the importance of continued evaluation of clinical outcomes as robotic arthroplasty technology continues to grow.

Keywords

robotics - knee replacement - technology - primary knee arthroplasty


Publication History

Received: 18 October 2019

Accepted: 02 May 2020

Article published online:
16 June 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (17) 1455-1460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pelt CE, Gililland JM, Erickson JA, Trimble DE, Anderson MB, Peters CL. Improving value in total joint arthroplasty: a comprehensive patient education and management program decreases discharge to post-acute care facilities and post-operative complications. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (01) 14-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rondon AJ, Phillips JLH, Fillingham YA, Gorica Z, Austin MS, Courtney PM. Bundled payments are effective in reducing costs following bilateral total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (07) 1317-1321.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Swenson ER, Bastian ND, Nembhard HB, Davis Iii CM. Reducing cost drivers in total joint arthroplasty: understanding patient readmission risk and supply cost. Health Syst (Basingstoke) 2017; 7 (02) 135-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sveom DS, Otteman MK, Garvin KL. Improving quality and decreasing cost by reducing re-admissions in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10 (03) 388-396
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B (07) 930-937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (08) 2496-2501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hampp EL, Scholl LY, Bhowmik-Stoker M. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 2019; 32 (03) 239-250
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS. et al. The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2018; 31 (01) 17-21
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Boylan M, Suchman K, Vigdorchik J, Slover J, Bosco J. Technology-assisted hip and knee arthroplasties: an analysis of utilization trends. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (04) 1019-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jeon SW, Kim K. Song SJ. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty does not improve long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 1656-1661
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A. et al. Patient satisfaction outcomes after robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a short-term evaluation. J Knee Surg 2017; 30: 849-853
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 McGreevy K, Bottros MM, Raja SN. Preventing chronic pain following acute pain: risk factors, preventive strategies, and their efficacy. Eur J Pain Suppl 2011; 5 (02) 365-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bade MJ, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Early high-intensity rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty improves outcomes. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 2011; 41 (12) 932-941
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lotke PA, Ecker ML. Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977; 59 (01) 77-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Reed MR, Bliss W, Sher JL, Emmerson KP, Jones SMG, Partington PF. Extramedullary or intramedullary tibial alignment guides: A randomized, prospective trial of radiological alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84 (06) 858-860
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 464: 111-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL. et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int 2017; 30: 441-446
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Peters CL, Mohr RA, Bachus KN. Primary total knee arthroplasty in the valgus knee: creating a balanced soft tissue envelope. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (06) 721-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Griffin FM, Insall JN, Scuderi GR. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (08) 970-973
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Petrullo KA, Lamar S, Nwankwo-Otti O, Alexander-Mills K, Viola D. The patient satisfaction survey: what does it mean to your bottom line?. J Hosp Adm 2012; 2: 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Liow MHL, Goh GSH, Wong MK, Chin PL, Tay DKJ, Yeo SJ. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25 (09) 2942-2951
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cool CL, Jacofsky DJ, Seeger KA, Sodhi N, Mont MA. A 90-day episode-of-care cost analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Comp Eff Res 2019; 8 (05) 327-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar