Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2020; 30(06): 548-553
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401988
Original Article

Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Placement in Children Has Few Major, but Many Minor Early Complications

Morten Kvello 
1   Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2   Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
,
Charlotte Kristensen Knatten
3   Department of Pediatrics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
,
Kristin Bjørnland
1   Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
2   Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Laparoscopic gastrostomy (LAPG) is an increasingly popular alternative to more traditional gastrostomy techniques. This study evaluates early postoperative complications following LAPG and investigates risk factors for gastrostomy complications.

Materials and Methods Retrospective study of patients <16 years undergoing LAPG from 2005 to 2018. Early postoperative complications (<30 days) were grouped as gastrostomy-related or general and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification for surgical complications.

Results A total of 104 patients, of which 54 (52%) had neurological impairment (NI), were included. Median age and weight were 1.2 years (1 day–15.2 years) and 8.9 kg (3.4–36), respectively. Operating time was median 37 minutes (19–86) and shorter in the second half of the patients (46 vs. 35 minutes, p = 0.04). A total of 40 (38%) patients experienced 53 gastrostomy-related complications. Of these, seven complications needed surgical treatment; severe leakage (2), too short gastrostomy button (1), feeding difficulties (1), gastric outlet obstruction (1), omentum trapped in umbilical port sutures (1), and suspected fascial defect (1). Stoma infection and granulation tissue were reported in 13 and 12%, respectively. Tube dislodgement occurred in six patients and was managed with bedside reinsertion in all. Gastrostomy-related complications were less frequent in NI patients (46 vs 22%, p = 0.01).

Conclusion LAPG is a safe procedure with few major complications, but a high rate of minor complications. Operating time declined during the study period, and NI patients had fewer gastrostomy-related complications.

Keywords

laparoscopy - gastrostomy - enteral nutrition


Publication History

Received: 02 August 2019

Accepted: 11 November 2019

Article published online:
31 December 2019

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Braegger C, Decsi T, Dias JA. et al; ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Practical approach to paediatric enteral nutrition: a comment by the ESPGHAN committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 51 (01) 110-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 McSweeney ME, Jiang H, Deutsch AJ, Atmadja M, Lightdale JR. Long-term outcomes of infants and children undergoing percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy tube placement. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 57 (05) 663-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sullivan PB, Juszczak E, Bachlet AM. et al. Impact of gastrostomy tube feeding on the quality of life of carers of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46 (12) 796-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pemberton J, Frankfurter C, Bailey K, Jones L, Walton JM. Gastrostomy matters--the impact of pediatric surgery on caregiver quality of life. J Pediatr Surg 2013; 48 (05) 963-970
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Avitsland TL, Kristensen C, Emblem R, Veenstra M, Mala T, Bjørnland K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a safe technique with major symptom relief and high parental satisfaction. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2006; 43 (05) 624-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant Jr RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15 (06) 872-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Suksamanapun N, Mauritz FA, Franken J, van der Zee DC, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom MY. Laparoscopic versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Access Surg 2017; 13 (02) 81-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rothenberg SS, Bealer JF, Chang JH. Primary laparoscopic placement of gastrostomy buttons for feeding tubes. A safer and simpler technique. Surg Endosc 1999; 13 (10) 995-997
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Petrosyan M, Khalafallah AM, Franklin AL, Doan T, Kane TD. Laparoscopic gastrostomy is superior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in children less than 5 years of age. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26 (07) 570-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lee H, Jones A, Vasudevan S. et al. Evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement in children. Pediatr Endosurg Innov Tech 2002; 6: 29-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Akay B, Capizzani TR, Lee AM. et al. Gastrostomy tube placement in infants and children: is there a preferred technique?. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (06) 1147-1152
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kvello M, Åvitsland TL, Knatten CK. et al. Trends in the use of gastrostomies at a tertiary paediatric referral centre. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51 (05) 625-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Backman T, Sjövie H, Kullendorff CM, Arnbjörnsson E. Continuous double U-stitch gastrostomy in children. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2010; 20 (01) 14-17
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Zamakhshary M, Jamal M, Blair GK, Murphy JJ, Webber EM, Skarsgard ED. Laparoscopic vs percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a new pediatric gold standard?. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (05) 859-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Berry JG, Poduri A, Bonkowsky JL. et al. Trends in resource utilization by children with neurological impairment in the United States inpatient health care system: a repeat cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 2012; 9 (01) e1001158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (02) 205-213
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Merli L, De Marco EA, Fedele C. et al. Gastrostomy placement in children: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy or laparoscopic gastrostomy?. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016; 26 (05) 381-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Franken J, Mauritz FA, Suksamanapun N, Hulsker CC, van der Zee DC, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom MY. Efficacy and adverse events of laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: results of a large cohort study. Surg Endosc 2015; 29 (06) 1545-1552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jones VS, La Hei ER, Shun A. Laparoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2007; 23 (11) 1085-1089
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Aprahamian CJ, Morgan TL, Harmon CM, Georgeson KE, Barnhart DC. U-stitch laparoscopic gastrostomy technique has a low rate of complications and allows primary button placement: experience with 461 pediatric procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006; 16 (06) 643-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wragg RC, Salminen H, Pachl M. et al. Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series. Pediatr Surg Int 2012; 28 (05) 443-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Angsten G, Danielson J, Kassa AM, Lilja HE. Outcome of laparoscopic versus open gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2015; 31 (11) 1067-1072
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Conlon SJ, Janik TA, Janik JS, Hendrickson RJ, Landholm AE. Gastrostomy revision: incidence and indications. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (09) 1390-1395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sjövie H, Larsson LT, Arnbjörnsson E. Postoperative gastrostomy site leakage correlated to the dimension of the gastrostomy button in children. Gastroenterol Insights 2010; 2: 34-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Norén E, Gunnarsdóttir A, Hanséus K, Arnbjörnsson E. Laparoscopic gastrostomy in children with congenital heart disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2007; 17 (04) 483-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lantz M, Hultin Larsson H, Arnbjörnsson E. Literature review comparing laparoscopic and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies in a pediatric population. Int J Pediatr 2010; 2010: 507616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Naiditch JA, Lautz T, Barsness KA. Postoperative complications in children undergoing gastrostomy tube placement. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20 (09) 781-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Viktorsdottir M, Salö M, Stenström P. et al. Complications according to underlying disease in children undergoing video-assisted gastrostomy. Med Res Arch 2017; 5: 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Liu R, Jiwane A, Varjavandi A. et al. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, laparoscopic and open gastrostomy insertion in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2013; 29 (06) 613-621
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Backman T, Arnbjörnsson E, Berglund Y, Larsson LT. Video-assisted gastrostomy in infants less than 1 year. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22 (03) 243-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kozlov Y, Novozhilov V, Kovalkov K, Rasputin A, Baradieva P, Razumovsky A. Comparison of the laparoscopic and open methods of gastrostomy at neonates and infants up to three months of age. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29 (07) 958-964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Mason CA, Skarda DE, Bucher BT. Outcomes after laparoscopic gastrostomy suture techniques in children. J Surg Res 2018; 232: 26-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar