Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2021; 38(07): 683-689
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3400449
Original Article

Male-to-Female Ratios, Race/Ethnicity, and Spontaneous Preterm Birth among 11 Million California Infants

Gary M. Shaw 
1   March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center at Stanford University, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Jonathan A. Mayo
1   March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center at Stanford University, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Michael L. Eisenberg
2   Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
,
Ralph Catalano
3   School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
,
David K. Stevenson
1   March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center at Stanford University, Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations Funding This project was supported by the March of Dimes Prematurity Research Center at Stanford University (MOD PR625253).
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective An observed disparity in population-scale data are a larger number of males among preterm births (PTBs). We investigated spontaneous PTB risk among women of various race/ethnic groups in combination with infants' sex.

Study Design This observational study was conducted in > 10 million California births (1991–2012) using birth certificates linked with maternal and infant hospital discharge data.

Results Male-to-female ratios among term (37–42 weeks) infants exhibited the narrow ratio range 1.02 to 1.06 across race/ethnic groups. Such ratios among spontaneous PTBs were generally larger for all race/ethnic groups except non-Hispanic blacks. For blacks, ratios tended to be lower and similar to their term birth counterpart, 1.03. Hazard ratios adjusted for maternal age and education for non-Hispanic blacks were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90–1.09), 1.01 (95% CI 0.95–1.08), 0.98 (95% CI 0.94–1.03), and 1.03 (95% CI 1.01–1.05), respectively, for gestational week groupings of 20 to 23, 24 to 27, 28 to 321, and 32 to 36. Hazard ratios for non-Hispanic whites for the same groupings were 1.08 (95% CI 0.98–1.18), 1.13 (95% CI 1.07–1.19), 1.21 (95% CI 1.17–1.25), and 1.18 (95% CI 1.17–1.19).

Conclusion Why male-to-female ratios are similar across gestational ages in blacks but substantially higher in other race/ethnic groups is theoretically considered relative to inflammation, stress, and other influences.

Keywords

secondary sex ratio - disparity - prematurity - pregnancy

Note

The data are publicly available from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). The data are not available for replication because specific approvals from OSHPD and the California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects must be obtained to access them.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 11 July 2019

Accepted: 14 October 2019

Article published online:
22 November 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Soon BT. The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. New York, NY: March of Dimes and the World Health Organization; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371 (9606): 75-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (06) 529-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Carmichael SL, Kan P, Padula AM. et al. Social disadvantage and the black-white disparity in spontaneous preterm delivery among California births. PLoS One 2017; 12 (08) e0182862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cooperstock M, Campbell J. Excess males in preterm birth: interactions with gestational age, race, and multiple birth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88 (02) 189-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zeitlin J, Ancel PY, Larroque B, Kaminski M. EPIPAGE Study. Fetal sex and indicated very preterm birth: results of the EPIPAGE study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (05) 1322-1325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Zeitlin J, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, De Mouzon J. et al. Fetal sex and preterm birth: are males at greater risk?. Hum Reprod 2002; 17 (10) 2762-2768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Challis J, Newnham J, Petraglia F, Yeganegi M, Bocking A. Fetal sex and preterm birth. Placenta 2013; 34 (02) 95-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ghidini A, Salafia CM. Gender differences of placental dysfunction in severe prematurity. BJOG 2005; 112 (02) 140-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Goldenberg RL, Andrews WW, Faye-Petersen OM, Goepfert AR, Cliver SP, Hauth JC. The Alabama Preterm Birth Study: intrauterine infection and placental histologic findings in preterm births of males and females less than 32 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195 (06) 1533-1537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Perni SC, Vardhana S, Kalish R, Chasen S, Witkin SS. Clara cell protein 16 concentration in mid-trimester amniotic fluid: association with fetal gender, fetal G>A +38 CC16 gene polymorphism and pregnancy outcome. J Reprod Immunol 2005; 68 (1-2): 85-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bruckner TA, Catalano R. Selection in utero and population health: theory and typology of research. SSM Popul Health 2018; 5: 101-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87 (02) 163-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Chien EK, Jayakrishnan A, Dailey TL, Raker CA, Phipps MG. Racial and ethnic disparity in male preterm singleton birth. J Reprod Med 2011; 56 (1-2): 58-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Eriksson JG, Kajantie E, Osmond C, Thornburg K, Barker DJ. Boys live dangerously in the womb. Am J Hum Biol 2010; 22 (03) 330-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Radin RG, Mumford SL, Silver RM. et al. Sex ratio following preconception low-dose aspirin in women with prior pregnancy loss. J Clin Invest 2015; 125 (09) 3619-3626
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Evans L, Myatt L. Sexual dimorphism in the effect of maternal obesity on antioxidant defense mechanisms in the human placenta. Placenta 2017; 51: 64-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Catalano R, Bruckner T, Anderson E, Gould JB. Fetal death sex ratios: a test of the economic stress hypothesis. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34 (04) 944-948
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Catalano R, Bruckner T, Gould J, Eskenazi B, Anderson E. Sex ratios in California following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (05) 1221-1227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Torche F, Kleinhaus K. Prenatal stress, gestational age and secondary sex ratio: the sex-specific effects of exposure to a natural disaster in early pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (02) 558-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wainstock T, Shoham-Vardi I, Glasser S, Anteby E, Lerner-Geva L. Fetal sex modifies effects of prenatal stress exposure and adverse birth outcomes. Stress 2015; 18 (01) 49-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 James WH. Proximate causes of the variation of the human sex ratio at birth. Early Hum Dev 2015; 91 (12) 795-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ingemarsson I. Gender aspects of preterm birth. BJOG 2003; 110 (Suppl. 20) 34-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Holzman C, Eyster J, Kleyn M. et al. Maternal weathering and risk of preterm delivery. Am J Public Health 2009; 99 (10) 1864-1871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Goodman JM, Karasek D, Anderson E, Catalano RA. The contribution of attenuated selection in utero to small-for-gestational-age (SGA) among term African American male infants. Soc Sci Med 2013; 88 (88) 83-89
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Liew Z, Olsen J, Cui X, Ritz B, Arah OA. Bias from conditioning on live birth in pregnancy cohorts: an illustration based on neurodevelopment in children after prenatal exposure to organic pollutants. Int J Epidemiol 2015; 44 (01) 345-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Khoury MJ, Erickson JD, James LM. Paternal effects on the human sex ratio at birth: evidence from interracial crosses. Am J Hum Genet 1984; 36 (05) 1103-1111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar