Lidocaine-Epinephrine-Tetracaine Gel Is More Efficient than Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics and Mepivacaine Injection for Pain Control during Skin Repair in Children: A Prospective, Propensity Score Matched Two-Center Study

Abstract

Introduction Skin lacerations are common in children and their repair is a very unpleasant experience for a child. While pain management has been recognized as a key element of high-quality patient care, recent studies report that pain management in the pediatric emergency departments is still suboptimal. Lidocaine-epinephrine-tetracaine (LET) gel could potentially improve the traumatic experience caused by skin repair as it obviates the need for infiltration. Thus, the aim of the current study was to compare local eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) plus mepivacaine infiltration with topical anesthetics (LET-gel).

Materials and Methods Prospective, propensity score-matched multicenter study including all children between 3 and 16 years presented at two centers. After anesthetics (LET vs. EMLA and infiltration) standardized skin repair was performed. Pain assessment was performed using the faces pain rating scale or visual analogue scale. Follow-up, performed 2 weeks after initial presentation, assessed wound infection rates and overall satisfaction.

Results Of 73 subjects 59 children (37 LET vs. 22 EMLA) were included after propensity score matching. Groups had similar baseline characteristics. Pretreatment was significantly less painful in LET versus local anesthetics group. Pain during skin repair was similar between groups (LET and EMLA with mepivacaine infiltration) and both groups demonstrated similar efficacy (procedure time, need for secondary infiltration, infection rate). Ultimately, pain levels during pretreatment and the surgical procedure were perceived significantly higher by the children than estimated by parents or surgeons.

Conclusion In conclusion, it appears that LET is superior to conventional anesthesia including mepivacaine infiltration in the pediatric emergency departments. Pretreatment with LET is significantly less painful but equally effective. Hence, we recommend LET as a topical anesthetic in the pediatric emergency department.

Keywords

LET - pain management - children - skin

• References

• 1 Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Quinn JV. Evaluation and management of traumatic lacerations. N Engl J Med 1997; 337 (16) 1142-1148
• 2 Boettcher M, Göttler S, Stoffel L. et al. Pediatric pain management in Switzerland. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 2012; 160: 887-894
• 3 Krauss BS, Calligaris L, Green SM, Barbi E. Current concepts in management of pain in children in the emergency department. Lancet 2016; 387 (10013): 83-92
• 4 Zhu LM, Stinson J, Palozzi L. et al. Improvements in pain outcomes in a Canadian pediatric teaching hospital following implementation of a multifaceted knowledge translation initiative. Pain Res Manag 2012; 17 (03) 173-179
• 5 Magaret ND, Clark TA, Warden CR, Magnusson AR, Hedges JR. Patient satisfaction in the emergency department—a survey of pediatric patients and their parents. Acad Emerg Med 2002; 9 (12) 1379-1388
• 6 Fischer S, Vinall J, Pavlova M. et al. Role of anxiety in young children's pain memory development after surgery. Pain 2019; 160 (04) 965-972
• 7 Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA. et al. Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain 2016; 17 (02) 131-157
• 8 Walsh BM, Bartfield JM. Survey of parental willingness to pay and willingness to stay for “painless” intravenous catheter placement. Pediatr Emerg Care 2006; 22 (11) 699-703
• 9 Lawton B, Hadj A. Laceration repair in children. Aust Fam Physician 2014; 43 (09) 600-602
• 10 Fein JA, Zempsky WT, Cravero JP. Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; American Academy of Pediatrics. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (05) e1391-e1405
• 11 MacLean S, Obispo J, Young KD. The gap between pediatric emergency department procedural pain management treatments available and actual practice. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007; 23 (02) 87-93
• 12 Taddio A, Soin HK, Schuh S, Koren G, Scolnik D. Liposomal lidocaine to improve procedural success rates and reduce procedural pain among children: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2005; 172 (13) 1691-1695
• 13 Zempsky WT. Pharmacologic approaches for reducing venous access pain in children. Pediatrics 2008; 122 (Suppl. 03) S140-S153
• 14 Singer AJ, Stark MJ. LET versus EMLA for pretreating lacerations: a randomized trial. Acad Emerg Med 2001; 8 (03) 223-230
• 15 von Baeyer CL. Children's self-reports of pain intensity: scale selection, limitations and interpretation. Pain Res Manag 2006; 11 (03) 157-162
• 16 Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B. The faces pain scale-revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain 2001; 93 (02) 173-183
• 17 Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain 2006; 125 (1-2): 143-157
• 18 Zhou H, Roberts P, Horgan L. Association between self-report pain ratings of child and parent, child and nurse and parent and nurse dyads: meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008; 63 (04) 334-342
• 19 Kamper SJ, Dissing KB, Hestbaek L. Whose pain is it anyway? Comparability of pain reports from children and their parents. Chiropr Man Therap 2016; 24: 24
• 20 Brudvik C, Moutte SD, Baste V, Morken T. A comparison of pain assessment by physicians, parents and children in an outpatient setting. Emerg Med J 2017; 34 (03) 138-144
• 21 Rajasagaram U, Taylor DM, Braitberg G, Pearsell JP, Capp BA. Paediatric pain assessment: differences between triage nurse, child and parent. J Paediatr Child Health 2009; 45 (04) 199-203
• 22 Al-Shaer D, Hill PD, Anderson MA. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain assessment and intervention. Medsurg Nurs 2011; 20 (01) 7-11
• 23 Weilbach C, Hoppe C, Karst M. et al. Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia—a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Pain Res 2017; 10: 1105-1109
• 24 Ehrenström-Reiz G, Reiz S, Stockman O. Topical anaesthesia with EMLA, a new lidocaine-prilocaine cream and the Cusum technique for detection of minimal application time. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1983; 27 (06) 510-512
• 25 Zempsky WT, Karasic RB. EMLA versus TAC for topical anesthesia of extremity wounds in children. Ann Emerg Med 1997; 30 (02) 163-166
• 26 Hopkins CS, Buckley CJ, Bush GH. Pain-free injection in infants. Use of a lignocaine-prilocaine cream to prevent pain at intravenous induction of general anaesthesia in 1-5-year-old children. Anaesthesia 1988; 43 (03) 198-201
• 27 Seaman M, Lammers R. Inability of patients to self-diagnose wound infections. J Emerg Med 1991; 9 (04) 215-219
• 28 Chan E, Hovenden M, Ramage E. et al. Virtual reality for pediatric needle procedural pain: two randomized clinical trials. J Pediatr 2019; 209: 160-167