J Knee Surg 2021; 34(06): 644-647
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700491
Original Article

Factors Complicating Discharge to Home following Total Knee Arthroplasty—A Single Institution Initiative

Kimona Issa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Main St. Paterson, New Jersey
,
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Main St. Paterson, New Jersey
,
Thomas A. Novack
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Main St. Paterson, New Jersey
,
Todd P. Pierce
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Main St. Paterson, New Jersey
,
Anthony Festa
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Main St. Paterson, New Jersey
,
Anthony J. Scillia
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Main St. Paterson, New Jersey
,
Vincent K. McInerney
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Main St. Paterson, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Recently, with the Medicare bundled payments initiative for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there has been a move by many institutions to further streamline costs associated with the entire operative and perioperative process. One of these cost-saving strategies has been to favor discharging patients to home with outpatient services as opposed to discharging to the relatively more expensive rehabilitation facilities. Our aim was to determine the success of a teaching institute's initiative in discharging patients to home instead of a rehabilitation facility. Specifically, we evaluated if there were differences in discharge disposition based off of (1) surgeon/patient preference, (2) length of stay, (3) demographics, and (4) postoperative complications. A retrospective review of all patients who had a TKA from 2015 to 2017 at a single teaching institution was performed and assessed discharge to home or to a rehabilitation facility. If they were not discharged to home, we evaluated why that did not happen, stratified the reason they were discharged to a rehabilitation facility into four groups based on (1) physician and occupational health team assessment, (2) patient preference, (3) physician preference, and (4) family or caretaker preference. A total of 229 patients were enrolled in this initiative, with 107 patients (47%) discharged to home with outpatient physical therapy services and 122 (53%) discharged to a rehabilitation facility. Of these, 35 patients (29%) went to these facilities because of physician and occupational health team assessment. However, 31 (25%) patients were due to patient preference, 32 (26%) were because of surgeon's preference, and 24 (20%) were not discharged to home because of family or caretaker preference. There were no differences in length of stay, gender, or complication rates between cohorts. Many patients can be safely discharged to home following TKA at a community teaching institution; however, there continues to be a strong prejudice by patients, physicians, and caretakers to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility despite the home discharge initiative.



Publication History

Received: 10 December 2018

Accepted: 01 September 2019

Article published online:
22 October 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA