PDF herunterladen
Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35(04): 404-409
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693469
Original Research
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Considerations for Timing of Defect Reconstruction in Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck

Arya W. Namin 
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Georgeanne E. Cornell
2   Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
,
Emily H. Smith
3   Department of Dermatology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
,
Robert P. Zitsch III
1   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
17. Juli 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify the incidence and characteristics of cases with positive margins on wide local excision for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (CMHN) and therefore provide a potential basis for selectively delaying reconstruction pending final histological clearance of melanoma. A systematic review of English language articles was performed on studies retrieved from PubMed and Web of Science. Original investigations published between July 1999 and June 2018 reporting on margin status of CMHN wide local excision specimens were included in the review. The incidence of positive margins after definitive resection for cutaneous melanoma in the literature ranges from 6 to 20.9%. The incidence is higher in cases of advanced patient age, diagnosis by shave biopsy, lentigo maligna melanoma subtype, desmoplastic subtype, tumor thickness, and ulceration. Delayed reconstruction remains the most oncologically sound decision, allowing for interpretation of margin status on paraffin-embedded tissue sections. However, resection and the resultant defect closure in a single stage is more expedient and potentially a more efficient use of resources. The risk–benefit ratio of immediate versus delayed reconstruction must be considered for each case. The incidence of positive margins is higher in cases of advanced patient age, diagnosis by shave biopsy, lentigo maligna melanoma subtype, desmoplastic subtype, increasing tumor thickness, and the presence of ulceration; delayed reconstruction should be strongly considered in these cases.

Keywords

melanoma - head and neck - melanoma in situ - margin - delayed reconstruction
 

  • References

  • 1 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html . Accessed January 1, 2019
    PubMed
  • 2 Quimby AE, Khalil D, Johnson-Obaseki S. Immediate versus delayed reconstruction of head and neck cutaneous melanoma. Laryngoscope 2018; 128 (11) 2566-2572
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Karanetz I, Stanley S, Knobel D. , et al. Melanoma extirpation with immediate reconstruction: the oncologic safety and cost savings of single-stage treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (01) 256-261
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Koolen PGL, Matos TR, Ibrahim AMS. , et al. Recurrence rates over 20 years in the treatment of malignant melanoma: immediate versus delayed reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (07) e1378
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM. , et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162 (11) 777-784
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Sullivan SR, Scott JR, Cole JK. , et al. Head and neck malignant melanoma: margin status and immediate reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 62 (02) 144-148
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Namin AW, Zitsch III RP. Impact of biopsy modality on the management of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 158 (03) 473-478
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Mangold AR, Skinner R, Dueck AC, Sekulic A, Pockaj BA. Risk factors predicting positive margins at primary wide local excision of cutaneous melanoma. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (05) 646-652
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Berdahl JP, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Casey WJ, Woog JJ. Optimal management and challenges in treatment of upper facial melanoma. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 57 (06) 616-620
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Miller CJ, Shin TM, Sobanko JF. , et al. Risk factors for positive or equivocal margins after wide local excision of 1345 cutaneous melanomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 77 (02) 333-340.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Christophel JJ, Johnson AK, McMurry TL, Park SS, Levine PA. Predicting positive margins in resection of cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (03) 683-688
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Rawlani R, Rawlani V, Qureshi HA, Kim JY, Wayne JD. Reducing margins of wide local excision in head and neck melanoma for function and cosmesis: 5-year local recurrence-free survival. J Surg Oncol 2015; 111 (07) 795-799
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Parrett BM, Kashani-Sabet M, Leong SPL, Buncke N, Singer MI. The safety of and indications for immediate reconstruction of head and neck melanoma defects: our early experience. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (Suppl. 01) S35-S37
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Anderson KW, Baker SR, Lowe L, Su L, Johnson TM. Treatment of head and neck melanoma, lentigo maligna subtype: a practical surgical technique. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001; 3 (03) 202-206
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Moyer JS, Rudy S, Boonstra PS. , et al. Efficacy of staged excision with permanent section margin control for cutaneous head and neck melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 2017; 153 (03) 282-288
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Möller MG, Pappas-Politis E, Zager JS. , et al. Surgical management of melanoma-in-situ using a staged marginal and central excision technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16 (06) 1526-1536
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Higgins II HW, Lee KC, Galan A, Leffell DJ. Melanoma in situ: part II. Histopathology, treatment, and clinical management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73 (02) 193-203 , quiz 203–204
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Melanoma (Version 2). Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2019
  • 20 DeBloom II JR, Zitelli JA, Brodland DG. The invasive growth potential of residual melanoma and melanoma in situ. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36 (08) 1251-1257
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Florell SR, Boucher KM, Leachman SA. , et al. Histopathologic recognition of involved margins of lentigo maligna excised by staged excision: an interobserver comparison study. Arch Dermatol 2003; 139 (05) 595-604
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Felton S, Taylor RS, Srivastava D. Excision margins for melanoma in situ on the head and neck. Dermatol Surg 2016; 42 (03) 327-334
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Kunishige JH, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Surgical margins for melanoma in situ. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66 (03) 438-444
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kunishige JH, Doan L, Brodland DG, Zitelli JA. Comparison of surgical margins for lentigo maligna versus melanoma in situ. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81 (01) 204-212
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Swetter SM, Tsao H, Bichakjian CK. , et al. Guidelines of care for the management of primary cutaneous melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 80 (01) 208-250
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Di Lorenzo S, Corradino B, Cordova A. Melanoma extirpation with immediate reconstruction: the oncologic safety and cost savings of single-stage treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139 (02) 560e-561e
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Al-Qurayshi Z, Hassan M, Srivastav S. , et al. Risk and survival of patients with head and neck cutaneous melanoma: national perspective. Oncology 2017; 93 (01) 18-28
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar