Longitudinal Microsurgery Laboratory Training during Hand Surgery Fellowship

Abstract

Background–Laboratory training courses have traditionally offered an attractive method to learn microsurgery in a low-risk environment. However, courses are often limited by cost, accessibility, and their one-time, nonlongitudinal nature. Our aims were to (1) describe our institution's microsurgical training course for hand surgery fellows, which is longitudinal and integrated within our fellowship curriculum and (2) investigate how this course affects the microsurgical confidence and competence of trainees throughout their fellowship year.

Methods–All hand fellows who trained in our 1-year combined hand surgery fellowship from 2016 through 2018 participated in this study. Baseline data on the type and duration of residency training, previous microsurgery experience and self-reported confidence, knowledge, and interest in microsurgery were recorded. Self-reported scores were documented using a continuous scale ranging from 0 to 10. An initial 3-day laboratory course combining the use of didactic teaching, a nonliving synthetic model, and a live rat model was conducted. Repeat laboratory training occurred thereafter at 6 and 12 months. At the end of each session, fellows repeated the baseline questionnaire and faculty assessed their microsurgical competence using a standardized global rating scale (GRS).

Results–A total of six fellows (2 years) were enrolled. At the end of the initial course, there was a statistically significant increase in mean self-reported confidence in microsurgery from 4.3 to 6.2 and knowledge from 4.7 to 6.5. Mean scores in interest were unchanged, from 9.2 to 9.3. There was also an increase in mean GRS score from day 3 to months 6 and 12.

Conclusion–A longitudinal microsurgical training course integrated within a hand surgery fellowship is associated with increased confidence and microsurgical skill. This study describes our approach and its feasibility.

Keywords

microsurgery - hand - curriculum - laboratory - educational - rat

Publication History

Received: 29 January 2019

Accepted: 15 April 2019

Publication Date:
28 May 2019 (online)

• References

• 1 Payatakes AH, Zagoreos NP, Fedorcik GG, Ruch DS, Levin LS. Current practice of microsurgery by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (04) 541-547
• 2 Shurey S, Akelina Y, Legagneux J, Malzone G, Jiga L, Ghanem AM. The rat model in microsurgery education: classical exercises and new horizons. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 201-208
• 3 Green CJ. Microsurgery in the clinic and laboratory. Lab Anim 1987; 21 (01) 1-10
• 4 Atkins JL, Kalu PU, Lannon DA, Green CJ, Butler PE. Training in microsurgical skills: does course-based learning deliver?. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (06) 481-485
• 5 Ko JW, Lorzano A, Mirarchi AJ. Effectiveness of a microvascular surgery training curriculum for orthopaedic surgery residents. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (11) 950-955
• 6 Beth Grossman L, Komatsu DE, Badalamente MA, Braunstein AM, Hurst LC. Microsurgical simulation exercise for surgical training. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (01) 116-120
• 7 Rodriguez JR, Yañez R, Cifuentes I, Varas J, Dagnino B. Microsurgery workout: a novel simulation training curriculum based on nonliving models. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (04) 739e-747e
• 8 Pafitanis G, Serrar Y, Raveendran M, Ghanem A, Myers S. The chicken thigh adductor profundus free muscle flap: a novel validated non-living microsurgery simulation training model. Arch Plast Surg 2017; 44 (04) 293-300
• 9 Perez-Abadia G, Janko M, Pindur L. , et al. Frankfurt microsurgery course: the first 175 trainees. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017; 43 (03) 377-386
• 10 Christensen TJ, Anding W, Shin AY, Bishop AT, Moran SL. The influence of microsurgical training on the practice of hand surgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (06) 442-449
• 11 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
• 12 Crosby NL, Clapson JB, Buncke HJ, Newlin L. Advanced non-animal microsurgical exercises. Microsurgery 1995; 16 (09) 655-658
• 13 Brosious JP, Tsuda ST, Menezes JM. , et al. Objective evaluation of skill acquisition in novice microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28 (08) 539-542
• 14 Fanua SP, Kim J, Shaw Wilgis EF. Alternative model for teaching microsurgery. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (08) 379-382
• 15 Colebunders B, Matthew MK, Thomson JG. The use of a surgical glove in microsurgical training: a new point of view. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (06) 505-506
• 16 Satterwhite T, Son J, Carey J. , et al. The Stanford Microsurgery and Resident Training (SMaRT) scale: validation of an on-line global rating scale for technical assessment. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72 (Suppl. 01) S84-S88
• 17 Silvestre J, Upton J, Chang B, Steinberg DR. The impact of specialty on cases performed during hand surgery fellowship training. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (05) e29
• 18 Ali S. Basic microvascular anastomosis simulation hub microsurgery course: an innovative competency-based approach to microsurgical training for early year's plastic surgery trainees. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 80 (04) 314-315
• 19 Kakar S, Bakri K, Shin AY. Survey of hand surgeons regarding their perceived needs for an expanded upper extremity fellowship. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (11) 2374-80.e1 , 3
• 20 Cabrol C, Gilbert A. Training of microsurgery in the laboratory of the Hôpitaux de Paris [article in French]. Chirurgie 1991; 117 (02) 145-148
• 21 Satterwhite T, Son J, Carey J. , et al. Microsurgery education in residency training: validating an online curriculum. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (04) 410-414
• 22 Singh M, Ziolkowski N, Ramachandran S, Myers SR, Ghanem AM. Development of a five-day basic microsurgery simulation training course: a cost analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 213-217
• 23 Chouari TAM, Lindsay K, Bradshaw E. , et al. An enhanced fresh cadaveric model for reconstructive microsurgery training. Eur J Plast Surg 2018; 41 (04) 439-446
• 24 Leclère FM, Trelles M, Lewbart GA, Vögelin E. Is there good simulation basic training for end-to-side vascular microanastomoses?. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37 (02) 454-458
• 25 Maluf Junior I, da Silva AB, Groth AK. , et al. An alternative experimental model for training in microsurgery. Rev Col Bras Cir 2014; 41 (01) 72-74
• 26 Lausada NR, Escudero E, Lamonega R, Dreizzen E, Raimondi JC. Use of cryopreserved rat arteries for microsurgical training. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (06) 500-501
• 27 Trignano E, Fallico N, Zingone G, Dessy LA, Campus GV. Microsurgical training with the three-step approach. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (02) 87-91
• 28 Elliott RM, Baldwin KD, Foroohar A, Levin LS. The impact of residency and fellowship training on the practice of microsurgery by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (04) 451-458
• 29 Willis RE, Richa J, Oppeltz R. , et al. Comparing three pedagogical approaches to psychomotor skills acquisition. Am J Surg 2012; 203 (01) 8-13
• 30 Willis RE, Wiersch J, Adams AJ, Al Fayyadh MJ, Weber RA, Wang HT. Development and evaluation of a simulation model for microvascular anastomosis training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33 (07) 493-501