Download PDF
Eur J Pediatr Surg 2020; 30(02): 201-204
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681024
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Mechanical Bowel Preparation versus No Preparation in Duhamel Procedure in Children with Hirschsprung's Disease

Mehrdad Hosseinpour
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
,
Bahareh Ahmadi
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
,
Sanaz Etezazian
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery, Imam Hossein Children's Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 October 2018

22 January 2019

Publication Date:
27 February 2019 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Mechanical bowel prep (MBP) prior to surgical treatment of Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR) has been a great problem of pediatric surgeons for a long time. We conducted a single-institution randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of no MBP in children with HSCR undergoing the Duhamel procedure.

Materials and Methods In this study, children with HSCR who were candidate for the Duhamel procedure were included (40 cases vs. 40 controls). In the case group, intraoperatively after transection of the bowel at the level of transitional zone, feces bulk was pulled up from the upper part of the rectum to the sigmoid colon above the peritoneal reflection and aganglionic bowel was resected. Inspissated stool in the distal of the rectum was removed by rectal washout intraoperatively. In the control group, routine MBP was performed. Cleanness of the rectum was evaluated intraoperatively.

Results In this study, a total of 80 children were enrolled. In 32 patients (80%), the goal of MPB was achieved in 4 hours. Mean polyethylene glycol volume was 1372.3 ± 231.9 mL. Preoperative rectal washout fluid was 635 ± 233.3 mL. There was no statistically significant difference in individual complication rates between groups. Four patients (5%) had intra-abdominal infection and 16 (20%) had wound infection. We had no anastomotic leak in our groups. All children or parents in the control group described the preoperative MBP as the most unpleasant part of the hospital administration.

Conclusion For young children with HSCR who were scheduled for Duhamel operation, we had found no clear benefit of MBP. However, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is needed to more definitely determine the best preoperative approach for children with HSCR.

Keywords

mechanical bowel prep - Hirschsprung's disease - postoperative complications
 

  • References

  • 1 Slim K, Vicaut E, Launay-Savary MV, Contant C, Chipponi J. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2009; 249 (02) 203-209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pineda CE, Shelton AA, Hernandez-Boussard T, Morton JM, Welton ML. Mechanical bowel preparation in intestinal surgery: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12 (11) 2037-2044
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ares GJ, Helenowski I, Hunter CJ, Madonna M, Reynolds M, Lautz T. Effect of preadmission bowel preparation on outcomes of elective colorectal procedures in young children. J Pediatr Surg 2018; 53 (04) 704-707
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Feng C, Sidhwa F, Anandalwar S. , et al. Variation in bowel preparation among pediatric surgeons for elective colorectal surgery: a problem of equipoise or a knowledge gap of the available clinical evidence?. J Pediatr Surg 2015; 50 (06) 967-971
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Pennington EC, Feng C, St Peter SD. , et al. Use of mechanical bowel preparation and oral antibiotics for elective colorectal procedures in children: is current practice evidence-based?. J Pediatr Surg 2014; 49 (06) 1030-1035
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Breckler FD, Fuchs JR, Rescorla FJ. Survey of pediatric surgeons on current practices of bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery in children. Am J Surg 2007; 193 (03) 315-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kothari PR, Karkera PJ, Gupta AR. , et al. Single-stage modified Duhamel procedure for Hirschsprung's disease: our experience. Afr J Paediatr Surg 2012; 9 (01) 13-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bhat AH, Parray FQ, Chowdri NA. Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study. Int J Surg 2016; 2: 26-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Miller PR, Fabian TC, Croce MA. , et al. Improving outcomes following penetrating colon wounds: application of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 2002; 235 (06) 775-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Conrad JK, Ferry KM, Foreman ML, Gogel BM, Fisher TL, Livingston SA. Changing management trends in penetrating colon trauma. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (04) 466-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shah M, Ellis CT, Phillips MR. , et al. Preoperative bowel preparation prior to elective bowel resection or ostomy closure in the pediatric patients population has no impact on outcomes. A prospective randomized study. Am Surg 2016; 82 (09) 801-806
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Aldrink JH, McManaway C, Wang W, Nwomeh BC. Mechanical bowel preparation for children undergoing elective colorectal surgery. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2015; 60 (04) 503-507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Serrurier K, Liu J, Breckler F. , et al. A multicenter evaluation of the role of mechanical bowel preparation in pediatric colostomy takedown. J Pediatr Surg 2012; 47 (01) 190-193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Leys CM, Austin MT, Pietsch JB, Lovvorn III HN, Pietsch JB. Elective intestinal operations in infants and children without mechanical bowel preparation: a pilot study. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (06) 978-981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stockmann PT, Philippart AI. The Duhamel procedure for Hirschsprung's disease. Semin Pediatr Surg 1998; 7 (02) 89-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Zmora O, Mahajna A, Bar-Zakai B. , et al. Colon and rectal surgery without mechanical bowel preparation: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2003; 237 (03) 363-367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Morris MS, Graham LA, Chu DI, Cannon JA, Hawn MT. Oral antibiotics bowel preparation significantly reduces surgical site infection rates and readmission rates in elective colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 261 (06) 1034-1040
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kiran RP, Murray AC, Chiuzan C, Estrada D, Forde K. Combined preoperative mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics significantly reduces surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and ileus after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 2015; 262 (03) 416-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Leys CM, Austin MT, Pietsch JB, Lovvorn III HN, Pietsch JB. Elective intestinal operations in infants and children without mechanical bowel preparation: a pilot study. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (06) 978-981
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Jandhyala SM, Talukdar R, Subramanyam C, Vuyyuru H, Sasikala M, Nageshwar Reddy D. Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21 (29) 8787-8803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tuddenham S, Sears CL. The intestinal microbiome and health. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2015; 28 (05) 464-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Valdes AM, Walter J, Segal E, Spector TD. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. BMJ 2018; 361: k2179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fry DE. Antimicrobial bowel preparation for elective colon surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2016; 17 (03) 269-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar