PDF icon Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2019; 36(01): 097-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667287
SMFM Fellowship Series Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Pfannenstiel versus Vertical Skin Incision for Cesarean Delivery in Women with Class III Obesity: A Randomized Trial

Caroline Marrs
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
,
Sean Blackwell
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Ashley Hester
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Gayle Olson
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
,
George R. Saade
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas
,
Jonathan Faro
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Claudia Pedroza
3   Center for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Baha Sibai
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Funding The trial received only internal funding from both sites.
Further Information

Publication History

10 April 2018

07 June 2018

Publication Date:
30 July 2018 (online)

Also available ateRefHebammen
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Objective To compare Pfannenstiel versus vertical skin incision for the prevention of cesarean wound complications in morbidly obese women.

Study Design Women with body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2 undergoing cesarean delivery (CD) were randomly allocated to Pfannenstiel or vertical skin incision. The primary outcome was a wound complication within 6 weeks. Due to a low consent rate, we limited enrollment to a defined time period for feasibility. We conducted a traditional frequentist analysis with log-binomial regression to obtain relative risks (RRs), and a Bayesian analysis to estimate the probability of treatment benefit. A priori, we decided that a ≥60% probability of treatment benefit for either incision type would be convincing evidence to pursue a larger trial.

Results A total of 648 women were approached, 228 were consented, and 91 were randomized. The primary outcome rate was 19% in the Pfannenstiel group and 21% in the vertical group (RR: 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 0.49–2.85). Bayesian analysis revealed a 59% probability that Pfannenstiel had a lower primary outcome rate.

Conclusion In the first published randomized trial to compare skin incision types for obese women undergoing CD, we were unable to demonstrate differences in clinical outcomes. Our trial suggests that a larger study would have a low probability for different findings.

Trial Registration NCT 01897376 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Keywords

cesarean - skin incision - Pfannenstiel - transverse - vertical - wound infection - complication - obesity

Condensation

Randomized trial of cesarean skin incision type was unable to show a difference in wound complications in women with class III obesity.


Note

This study was presented in oral format at the 38th Annual Pregnancy Meeting, Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Dallas, TX, January 29 to February 3, 2018.