Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00035037.xml
Methods Inf Med 1968; 07(03): 187-200
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636297
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636297
Original Article
Einige χ2-Tests zur Hypothesenprüfung bei Kontingenztafeln [*])
SOME χ-TESTS FOR TESTING HYPOTHESES IN CONTINGENCY TABLESFurther Information
Publication History
Publication Date:
17 February 2018 (online)
Die vorliegende TJbersichtsarbeit behandelt Unabhängigkeitstests für Kontingenztafeln. Ausführlich dargestellt werden Aufteilungen der Testgrößen entsprechend bestimmter Vergleiche bei rXs-Tafeln sowie die Auswertung der 2 X 2 X t-Tafel. Die bei multiplen Vergleichen auftauchenden Schwierigkeiten werden berücksichtigt. An einer Reihe von medizinischen Beispielen werden die praktischen Folgerungen aus den Testergebnissen eingehend besprochen.
This review deals with tests of independence for contingency tables. The partition of the test statistic in rXs tables for certain contrasts and the treatment of a 2 X 2 X t table are given in detail. Difficulties arising in multiple comparisons are considered. For some medical examples the practical conclusions from the statistical results are discussed.
* Herrn Prof. Dr. Dr. S. KOLLER zum 60. Geburtstag gewidmet.
-
Literaturverzeichnis
- 1 Ahmitage P. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 33: 375-386 1955;
- 2 Ahmitage P. The chi-square test for heterogeneity of proportions after adjustment for stratification. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 28: 150-163 1966;
- 3 Bahnard G. D. Significance for 2X2 tables. Biometrika 34: 123-138 1947;
- 4 Bahtlett M. S. Contingency table interactions. J. roy. statist. Soc. Suppl 2: 248-252 1935;
- 5 Bahtlett M. S, and Kendall D. G. The statistical analysis of variance-heterogeneity and the logarithmic transformation. J. roy. statist. Soc. Suppl 8: 128-138 1946;
- 6 Bennett B. M, and Nakamuha E. Tables for testing significance in a 2X3 contingency table. Technometrics 5: 501-511 1963;
- 7 Bennett B. M, and Nakamuha E. The power function of the exact test for the 2X3 contingency table. Technometrics 6: 439-458 1964;
- 8 Bennett C. A, and Fhanklin N. L. Statistical Analysis. pp. 602 615 ff. Wiley; New York: 1963
- 9 Bennett R. W. Sizes of the χ2 test in the multinomial distribution. Austr. J. Statist 4: 86-88 1962;
- 10 Cochran W. G. The χ2 test of goodness of fit. Ann. math. Statist 23: 315-345 1952;
- 11 Cochran W. G. Some methods of strengthening the common χ2 tests. Biometrics 10: 417-451 1954;
- 12 Cox D. R. Some statistical methods connected with series of events. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 17: 129-157 1955;
- 13 Daly C. A simple test for trends in a contingency table. Biometrics 18: 114-119 1962;
- 14 Darroch J. N. Interactions in multi-factor contingency tables. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 24: 251-263 1962;
- 15 Dyke G. V, and Patterson H. D. Analysis of factorial arrangements when the data are proportions. Biometrics 8: 1-12 1952;
- 16 Egg K, Rüst H, und van der Waerden B. L. Die Irrtumswahrscheinlichkeit des χ2-Tests im Grenzfall der Pois-sonverteilunrr. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb 4: 260-264 1965;
- 17 Finney D. J. Probit Analysis. 2. Edit. University Press; Cambridge: 1962
- 18 Fisher R. A, and Yates F. Statistical tables. 6. Edit., pp. 74-77. Oliver & Boyd; Edinburgh: 1963
- 19 Gart J. J. Alternative analyses of contingency tables. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 28: 164-179 1966;
- 20 Good I. J. Maximum entropy for hypothesis formulation, especially for multidimensional contingency tables. Ann. math. Statist 34: 911-934 1963;
- 21 Goodman L. A. On methods for comparing contingency tables. J. roy. statist. Soc. A, 326: 94-108 1963;
- 22 Goodman L. A. On Plackett’s test for continrrencv table interactions. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 25: 179-188 1963;
- 23 Goodman L. A. Simple methods for analysing three-factor interactions in contingency tables. J. Amer. statist. Ass 59: 319-352 1964;
- 24 Goodman L. A. Interactions in multidimensional contingency tables. Ann. math. Statist 35: 632-646 1964;
- 25 Goodman L. A. Simultaneous confidence intervals for contrasts among multinomial populations. Ann. math. Statist 35: 716-725 1964;
- 26 Goodman L. A, and Kruskal W. H. Measures of association for cross classifications I, II, III. J. Amer. statist. Ass. 49: 732-764 1954; 54: 123-163, 1959; 58: 310-364, 1963.
- 27 Grosse H. Durch »Berkson’s fallacy« vorgetäuschte negative Korrelationen der Arteriosklerose. Z. ges. inn. Med 39: 566-569 1964;
- 28 Irwin J. O. A note on the subdivision of %2 into components. Biometrika 36: 130-134 1949;
- 29 Kastenbaum M. A, and Lamphiear D. E. Calculation of χ2 to test the no three-factor interaction hypothesis. Biometrics 35: 107-115 1959;
- 30 Kastenbaum M. A. A note on the additive partitioning of chi-square in contingency tables. Biometrics 36: 416-422 1960;
- 31 Kimball A. W. Short-cut formulas for the exact partition of χ2 in contingency tables. Biometrics 30: 452-458 1954;
- 32 Koller S. Systematik der statistischen Schlufifehler. Method. Inform. Med 3: 113-117 1964;
- 33 Kullback S, Kuppermann M, and Ku H. H. Tests of contingency tables and Markov chains. Technometrics 4: 573-608 1962;
- 34 Kullback S. Information Theory and Statistics; pp. 155-188. Wiley; New York: 1959
- 35 Ku H. H. A note on contingency tables involving zero frequencies and the 2 i test. Technometrics 5: 398-400 1963;
- 36 Lancaster H. O. The exact partition of χ2 and its application to the problem of pooling of small expectations. Biometrika 37: 267-270 1950;
- 37 Lancaster H.O. Complex contingency tables treated by the partition of χ2 . J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 33: 242-249 1951;
- 38 Lancaster H. O. On tests of independence in several dimensions. J. Aust. math. Soc 3: 241-254 1960;
- 39 Lancaster H. O, and Hamdan M. A. Estimation of the correlation coefficient in contingency tables with possibly non-metrical characters. Psychometrika 29: 383-391 1964;
- 40 Lange H. J. Syntropie von Krankheiten. Method. Inform. Med 4: 141-145 1965;
- 41 Lewis B. N. On the analysis of interaction in multidimensional contingency tables. J. roy. statist. Soc. A, 325: 88-117 1962;
- 42 Lewontin R. C, and Felsenstein J. The robustness of homogeneity tests in 2Xn tables. Biometrics 23: 19-33 1965;
- 43 Mainland D. Elementary medical statistics; pp. 117 ff. Saunders; Philadelphia: 1963
- 44 Maxwell A. E. Analysing qualitative data. Methuen; London: 1961
- 45 Neyman J. Contributions to the theory of the χ2 test. Proceedings of the 1st Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. pp. 239-273. University of California Press; Berkeley: 1949
- 46 Norton H. W. Calculation of chi-square for complex contingency tables. J. Amer. statist. Ass 40: 251-258 1945;
- 47 Patau K. Eine neue χ2-Tafel. z. Indukt. Abstamm.- u. Vererb.-L 80: 558-564 1942;
- 48 Pearson K. On the criterion that a given system of deviations is such that it can be reasonable supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Philos. Mag. Ser. B 50: 157-172 1900; zit. nach (56).
- 49 Pfanzagl J. Tests und Konfidenzintervalle fur exponentielle Verteilungen und deren Anwendung auf einige diskrete Verteilungen. Metrika 3: 1-25 1960;
- 50 Plackett R. L. A note on interactions in contingency tables. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 24: 162-166 1962;
- 51 Roy S. N. Some aspects of multivariate analysis. pp. 113-134. Eka Press; Calcutta: 1958
- 52 Roy S. N, and Bhafkar V. P. Some nonparametric analogs of ‘normal’ anova, manova, and of studies in ‘normal’ association. In Olkin I. (Edit.) Contributions to Probability and Statistics. pp. 371-387. Stanford University Press; Stanford: 1960
- 53 Roy S. N, and Kastenbaum M. A. On the hypothesis of ‘no interaction’ in a multiway contingency table. Ann. math. Statist 27: 749-757 1956;
- 54 Roy S. N, and Mitra S. K. An introduction to some non-parametric generalizations of ANOVA in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 43: 361-376 1956;
- 55 Sachs L. Der Vergleich zweier Prozentsätze — Unabhängigkeitsteste für Mehrfeldertafeln. Biometr. Z 7: 55-60 1965;
- 56 Schäffer K. A. Der Likelihood-Anpassungstest. Mittbl. math. Statist S: 27-54 1957;
- 57 Scheffe H. A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 40: 87-104 1953;
- 58 Schneider B. Probitmodell und Logitmodell in ihrer Bedeutung für die experimentelle Prüfung von Arzneimitteln. Antibiot. et Chemother 12: 271-286 1964;
- 59 Simpson E. H. The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J. roy. statist. Soc. B, 33: 238-241 1951;
- 60 Snedecor G. W. Chi-squares of Bartlett, Mood, and Lancaster in a 23 contingency table. Biometrics 14: 560-562 1958;
- 61 Tallis G. M. The use of models in the analysis of some classes of contingency tables. Biometrics 20: 832-839 1964;
- 62 Tukey J. W. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5: 99-114 1949;
- 63 Wagner G. Bedeutung, Grenzen und Gefahren der Statistik in der Medizin. Dtsch. med. Wschr 82: 1427-1432 und 1484-1491, 1957;
- 64 Wilks S. S. The likelihood test of independence in contingency tables. Ann. math. Statist 6: 190-196 1935;
- 65 Wilks S. S. Mathematical Statistics. pp. 290-291. Wiley; New York: 1962