Development of a Device-Assisted Nerve-Regeneration Procedure in Disruptive Lesions of the Brachial Plexus

Abstract

Background We describe the development of a new surgical procedure to be used in the treatment of disruptive brachial plexus (BP) lesions. It is centered on an artificial device designed to assist nerve regeneration by providing a confined and protected environment. Nerve fibers can repair inside the device, while the adverse massive scar-tissue formation is limited to the outside of the device.

Methods Steps in the development of the procedure were (1) definition of the rationale, (2) design of the device, (3) choice of an in vivo translational model, (4)refinement of the surgical procedure, and (5) performance of an in vivo pilot study as a proof of concept. An interdisciplinary team from several laboratories was involved in this work over a period of 6 years.

Results Results showed the absence of significant scar tissue in the regenerate and the presence of myelinated fibers aligned proximodistally between the stumps. This surgical approach can be seen not only as a definitive treatment but also as an early examination and stabilization before some different surgery will be later performed. It may also be used as additional protection for traditional surgery like end-to-end coaptation.

Conclusions We conclude that the availability of a suitable device-assisted early treatment, even if not to be considered definitive, could help in addressing the BP lesions at an earlier stage and this may improve the final outcome. Our evidence justifies further experimentation on this approach.

Keywords

biomaterials - brachial plexus - nerve regeneration

• References

• 1 Ali ZS, Heuer GG, Faught RW. , et al. Upper brachial plexus injury in adults: comparative effectiveness of different repair techniques. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (01) 195-201
• 2 Hems TE. Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (06) 568-572
• 3 Birch R. Timing of surgical reconstruction for closed traumatic injury to the supraclavicular brachial plexus. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (06) 562-567
• 4 Merolli A. Nerve-conduits or nerve-guides? When terminology matters. Injury 2013; 44 (06) 878-879
• 5 IJkema-Paassen J, Jansen K, Gramsbergen A, Meek MF. Transection of peripheral nerves, bridging strategies and effect evaluation. Biomaterials 2004; 25 (09) 1583-1592
• 6 Ashley Jr WW, Weatherly T, Park TS. Collagen nerve guides for surgical repair of brachial plexus birth injury. J Neurosurg 2006; 105 (6, Suppl): 452-456
• 7 Wolfe SW, Strauss HL, Garg R, Feinberg J. Use of bioabsorbable nerve conduits as an adjunct to brachial plexus neurorrhaphy. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (10) 1980-1985
• 8 Merolli A, Joyce TJ. , Eds. Biomaterials in Hand Surgery. New York: Springer; 2009: 126-143
• 9 Lundborg G, Dahlin LB, Danielsen N. Ulnar nerve repair by the silicone chamber technique. Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1991; 25 (01) 79-82
• 10 Merle M, Dellon AL, Campbell JN, Chang PS. Complications from silicon-polymer intubulation of nerves. Microsurgery 1989; 10 (02) 130-133
• 11 Dellon AL. Use of a silicone tube for the reconstruction of a nerve injury. J Hand Surg [Br] 1994; 19 (03) 271-272
• 12 Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Clinical nerve reconstruction with a bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid tube. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (03) 419-424
• 13 Archibald SJ, Krarup C, Shefner J, Li ST, Madison RD. A collagen-based nerve guide conduit for peripheral nerve repair: an electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in rodents and nonhuman primates. J Comp Neurol 1991; 306 (04) 685-696
• 14 Ezra M, Bushman J, Shreiber D, Schachner M, Kohn J. Enhanced femoral nerve regeneration after tubulization with a tyrosine-derived polycarbonate terpolymer: effects of protein adsorption and independence of conduit porosity. Tissue Eng Part A 2014; 20 (3-4): 518-528
• 15 Sinis N, Schaller HE, Schulte-Eversum C. , et al. Nerve regeneration across a 2-cm gap in the rat median nerve using a resorbable nerve conduit filled with Schwann cells. J Neurosurg 2005; 103 (06) 1067-1076
• 16 Schlosshauer B, Dreesmann L, Schaller HE, Sinis N. Synthetic nerve guide implants in humans: a comprehensive survey. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (04) 740-747 , discussion 747–748
• 17 Ichihara S, Inada Y, Nakamura T. Artificial nerve tubes and their application for repair of peripheral nerve injury: an update of current concepts. Injury 2008; 39 (Suppl. 04) 29-39
• 18 Pabari A, Yang SY, Seifalian AM, Mosahebi A. Modern surgical management of peripheral nerve gap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (12) 1941-1948
• 19 Deumens R, Bozkurt A, Meek MF. , et al. Repairing injured peripheral nerves: Bridging the gap. Prog Neurobiol 2010; 92 (03) 245-276
• 20 Jiang X, Lim SH, Mao HQ, Chew SY. Current applications and future perspectives of artificial nerve conduits. Exp Neurol 2010; 223 (01) 86-101
• 21 Kehoe S, Zhang XF, Boyd D. FDA approved guidance conduits and wraps for peripheral nerve injury: a review of materials and efficacy. Injury 2012; 43 (05) 553-572
• 22 Merolli A, Rocchi L, Spinelli MS, De Vitis R, Catalano F. Spontaneous gait recovery after sciatic nerve transection impairs the non-invasive evaluation of artificial nerve guides in rats. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2008; 6 (03) 157-162
• 23 Merolli A, Rocchi L, Catalano F. , et al. In vivo regeneration of rat sciatic nerve in a double-halved stitch-less guide: a pilot-study. Microsurgery 2009; 29 (04) 310-318
• 24 Merolli A, Marceddu S, Rocchi L, Catalano F. In vivo study of ethyl-2-cyanoacrylate applied in direct contact with nerves regenerating in a novel nerve-guide. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21 (06) 1979-1987
• 25 Sunderland S. The intraneural topography of the radial, median and ulnar nerves. Brain 1945; 68: 243-299
• 26 Merolli A, Rocchi L, Wang XM, Cui FZ. Peripheral nerve regeneration inside collagen-based artificial nerve guides in humans. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 2015; 13 (01) 61-65
• 27 Yan J, Hitomi J. Fiber arrangements of nerves belonging to ventral and dorsal divisions in the proximal region of the brachial plexus: a study using fluorescence of DiI and DiO in adult rats. Surg Radiol Anat 2004; 26 (04) 312-318
• 28 Aggarwal A, Harjeet K, Sahni D, Aggarwal A. Bilateral multiple complex variations in the formation and branching pattern of brachial plexus. Surg Radiol Anat 2009; 31 (09) 723-731
• 29 Emamhadi M, Chabok SY, Samini F. , et al. Anatomical variations of brachial plexus in adult cadavers; a descriptive study. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2016; 4 (03) 253-258
• 30 Guday E, Bekele A, Muche A. Anatomical study of prefixed versus postfixed brachial plexuses in adult human cadaver. ANZ J Surg 2017; 87 (05) 399-403
• 31 Merolli A. Modelling peripheral nerve from studies on “the bands of Fontana” and on “artificial nerve-guides” suggests a new recovery mechanism which can concur with brain plasticity. Am J Neuroprot Neuroregen 2016; 8: 45-53