The Impact of Computed Tomography on Decision Making in Tibial Plateau Fractures

Abstract

Schatzker introduced one of the most used classification systems for tibial plateau fractures, based on plain radiographs. Computed tomography brought to attention the importance of coronal plane-oriented fractures. The goal of our study was to determine if the addition of computed tomography would affect the decision making of surgeons who usually use the Schatzker classification to assess tibial plateau fractures. Image studies of 70 patients who sustained tibial plateau fractures were uploaded to a dedicated homepage. Every patient was linked to a folder which contained two radiographic projections (anteroposterior and lateral), three interactive videos of computed tomography (axial, sagittal, and coronal), and eight pictures depicting tridimensional reconstructions of the tibial plateau. Ten attending orthopaedic surgeons, who were blinded to the cases, were granted access to the homepage and assessed each set of images in two different rounds, separated to each other by an interval of 2 weeks. Each case was evaluated in three steps, where surgeons had access, respectively to radiographs, two-dimensional videos of computed tomography, and three-dimensional reconstruction images. After every step, surgeons were asked to present how would they classify the case using the Schatzker system and which surgical approaches would be appropriate. We evaluated the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Schatzker classification using the Kappa concordance coefficient, as well as the impact of computed tomography in the decision making regarding the surgical approach for each case, by using the chi-square test and likelihood ratio. The interobserver concordance kappa coefficients after each assessment step were, respectively, 0.58, 0.62, and 0.64. For the intraobserver analysis, the coefficients were, respectively, 0.76, 0.75, and 0.78. Computed tomography changed the surgical approach selection for the types II, V, and VI of Schatzker (p < 0.01). The addition of computed tomography scans to plain radiographs improved the interobserver reliability of Schatzker classification. Computed tomography had a statistically significant impact in the selection of surgical approaches for the lateral tibial plateau.

Keywords

tibial plateau - fracture - classification - computed tomography - decision making

• References

• 1 Palmer I. Fractures of the upper end of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1951; 33B [phone]
• 2 Hohl M. Tibial condylar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967; 49 (07) 1455-1467
• 3 Schatzker J. Compression in the surgical treatment of fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974; (105) 220-239
• 4 Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. Berlin Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990. . ISBN 978–3-642–61261–9
• 5 Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968--1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; (138) 94-104
• 6 Audigé L, Bhandari M, Kellam J. How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications? A systematic review of their methodologies. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (02) 184-194
• 7 Walton NP, Harish S, Roberts C, Blundell C. AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123 (08) 396-398
• 8 Charalambous CP, Tryfonidis M, Alvi F. , et al. Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89 (04) 400-404
• 9 Maripuri SN, Rao P, Manoj-Thomas A, Mohanty K. The classification systems for tibial plateau fractures: how reliable are they?. Injury 2008; 39 (10) 1216-1221
• 10 Brunner A, Horisberger M, Ulmar B, Hoffmann A, Babst R. Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures; does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability?. Injury 2010; 41 (02) 173-178
• 11 Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Coles CP, Henley MB, Benirschke SK. Functional outcomes of severe bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with dual incisions and medial and lateral plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (08) 1713-1721
• 12 Higgins TF, Kemper D, Klatt J. Incidence and morphology of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (01) 45-51
• 13 Bhattacharyya T, McCarty III LP, Harris MB. , et al. The posterior shearing tibial plateau fracture: treatment and results via a posterior approach. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19 (05) 305-310
• 14 Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46
• 15 Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33 (01) 159-174
• 16 Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng BF. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (11) 683-692
• 17 Chan PS, Klimkiewicz JJ, Luchetti WT. , et al. Impact of CT scan on treatment plan and fracture classification of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11 (07) 484-489
• 18 Carlson DA. Bicondylar fracture of the posterior aspect of the tibial plateau. A case report and a modified operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (07) 1049-1052
• 19 Molenaars RJ, Mellema JJ, Doornberg JN, Kloen P. Tibial plateau fracture characteristics: computed tomography mapping of lateral, medial, and bicondylar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97 (18) 1512-1520