Thromb Haemost 2000; 83(05): 788-789
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613912
Letters to the Editor
Schattauer GmbH

Is Clinical Probability Assessment of Deep Vein Thrombosis by a Score Really Standardized?

Alessandro Bigaroni
,
Arnaud Perrier
1   Medical Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
,
Henri Bounameaux
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 21 October 1999

Accepted after revision 16 December 1999

Publication Date:
08 December 2017 (online)

 

 
  • Refrences

  • 1 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ, de Moerloose P, Lepage R, Slosman D, Didier D, Unger PF, Patenaude JV, Bounameaux H. Noninvasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-5.
  • 2 Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, Lensing AWA, Foster G, Kearon C, Weitz J, D’Ovidio R, Cogo A, Prandoni P, Girolami A, Ginsberg JS. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 345: 1326-30.
  • 3 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, Clement C, Robinson KS, Lewandowski B. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-8.
  • 4 Miron MJ, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Clinical probability of deep vein thrombosis: comparison between a score and an empirical assessment. J Intern Med. 2000 (in press).
  • 5 Cohen J. A coefficient agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psych Meas 1960; 20: 37-46.
  • 6 Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, Lensing AWA, Foster G, Kearon C, Weitz J, D’Ovidio R, Cogo A, Prandoni P, Girolami A, Ginsberg JS. A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography: potential for an improvement in the diagnostic process. J Intern Med 1998; 243: 15-23.