Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2017; 33(08): 563-570
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1603332
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Acute Treatment Patterns for Lower Extremity Trauma in the United States: Flaps versus Amputation

Lily R. Mundy
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Tracy Truong
2   Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ronnie L. Shammas
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Mark J. Gage
3   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
,
Gina-Maria Pomann
2   Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Scott T. Hollenbeck
1   Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

10 February 2017

17 April 2017

Publication Date:
17 May 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Treatment algorithms for large soft tissue defects in lower extremity trauma are not clearly defined. The aim of this study is to determine if there are geographic or demographic differences in the management of open tibia fractures with soft tissue defects requiring either soft tissue reconstruction or amputation in the United States (US).

Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2000 to 2011. We evaluated flap and amputation rates in the open tibia fractures with soft tissue defects based on geographic and socioeconomic factors.

Results From 2000 to 2011, there were 175,283 open tibia fractures in the US; 7.2% (n = 12,620) had a concomitant soft tissue defect requiring either flap or amputation. The overall flap rate was 73.2% (n = 9,235). When compared with the South at 68%, flap rates were highest in the West at 79% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49, 2.86; p < 0.0001), followed by the Northeast at 77% (AOR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.22, 2.19; p = 0.001), and the Midwest at 74% (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.25, 2.47; p = 0.001). Flap rates were lower in the rural hospitals in the West (AOR = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.84; p = 0.03) and Northeast (AOR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.37, 0.82; p = 0.003) when compared with the urban hospitals. Flap rates were highest in the highest income quartile at 77% (AOR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.05, 2.25; p = 0.03) compared with 72% in the lowest income quartile.

Conclusions Reconstruction rates were significantly higher in three major US regions when compared with the South, urban hospitals in the West and Northeast, and the highest income quartile.

Keywords

lower extremity trauma - flap - soft tissue reconstruction - open tibia fracture
 

  • References

  • 1 MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Kellam JF. , et al. Characterization of patients with high-energy lower extremity trauma. J Orthop Trauma 2000; 14 (07) 455-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89 (03) 422-429
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Haddock NT, Weichman KE, Reformat DD, Kligman BE, Levine JP, Saadeh PB. Lower extremity arterial injury patterns and reconstructive outcomes in patients with severe lower extremity trauma: a 26-year review. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210 (01) 66-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Harris AM, Althausen PL, Kellam J, Bosse MJ, Castillo R. ; Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) Study Group. Complications following limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. J Orthop Trauma 2009; 23 (01) 1-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Higgins TF, Klatt JB, Beals TC. Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP)--the best available evidence on limb-threatening lower extremity trauma. Orthop Clin North Am 2010; 41 (02) 233-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dirschl DR, Dahners LE. The mangled extremity: when should it be amputated?. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1996; 4 (04) 182-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ly TV, Travison TG, Castillo RC, Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ. ; LEAP Study Group. Ability of lower-extremity injury severity scores to predict functional outcome after limb salvage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (08) 1738-1743
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Kellam JF. , et al. A prospective evaluation of the clinical utility of the lower-extremity injury-severity scores. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A (01) 3-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bosse MJ, McCarthy ML, Jones AL. , et al; Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) Study Group. The insensate foot following severe lower extremity trauma: an indication for amputation?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (12) 2601-2608
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Momoh AO, Kumaran S, Lyons D. , et al. An argument for salvage in severe lower extremity trauma with posterior tibial nerve injury: the Ganga Hospital experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (06) 1337-1352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lange RH, Bach AW, Hansen Jr ST, Johansen KH. Open tibial fractures with associated vascular injuries: prognosis for limb salvage. J Trauma 1985; 25 (03) 203-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bondurant FJ, Cotler HB, Buckle R, Miller-Crotchett P, Browner BD. The medical and economic impact of severely injured lower extremities. J Trauma 1988; 28 (08) 1270-1273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ellington JK, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC, MacKenzie EJ. ; LEAP Study Group. The mangled foot and ankle: results from a 2-year prospective study. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27 (01) 43-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bunch WH, Chapman RG. Patient preferences in surgery for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67 (05) 794-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon's mechanical turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspect Psychol Sci 2011; 6 (01) 3-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Radley DC, Schoen C. Geographic variation in access to care--the relationship with quality. N Engl J Med 2012; 367 (01) 3-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Waidmann TA, Rajan S. Race and ethnic disparities in health care access and utilization: an examination of state variation. Med Care Res Rev 2000; 57 (Suppl. 01) 55-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Albornoz CR, Cohen WA, Razdan SN. , et al. The impact of travel distance on breast reconstruction in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 12-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Butler PD, Nelson JA, Fischer JP. , et al. Racial and age disparities persist in immediate breast reconstruction: an updated analysis of 48,564 patients from the 2005 to 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data sets. Am J Surg 2016; 212 (01) 96-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sharma K, Grant D, Parikh R, Myckatyn T. Race and breast cancer reconstruction: is there a health care disparity?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (02) 354-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Morrow M, Li Y, Alderman AK. , et al. Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making. JAMA Surg 2014; 149 (10) 1015-1021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Brown ZD, Bey AK, Bonfield CM. , et al. Racial disparities in health care access among pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2016; 18 (03) 269-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yuan F, Chung KC. Impact of safety net hospitals in the care of the hand-injured patient: a national perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (02) 429-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rios-Diaz AJ, Metcalfe D, Singh M. , et al. Inequalities in specialist hand surgeon distribution across the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (05) 1516-1522
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Skaggs DL, Lehmann CL, Rice C. , et al. Access to orthopaedic care for children with medicaid versus private insurance: results of a national survey. J Pediatr Orthop 2006; 26 (03) 400-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Thakur NA, Plante MJ, Kayiaros S, Reinert SE, Ehrlich MG. Inappropriate transfer of patients with orthopaedic injuries to a level I trauma center: a prospective study. J Orthop Trauma 2010; 24 (06) 336-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Friedrich JB, Poppler LH, Mack CD, Rivara FP, Levin LS, Klein MB. Epidemiology of upper extremity replantation surgery in the United States. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 (11) 1835-1840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bureau USC. . United States Census 2014 . Available at: https://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2014.html . Accessed 2016 December
    PubMed
  • 29 American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery. Available at: http://www.microsurg.org/ . Accessed 2016 December
    PubMed