Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2017; 34(03): 259-263
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586505
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Relationship of Hospital Staff Coverage and Delivery Room Resuscitation Practices to Birth Asphyxia

Joanna H. Tu
1   College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Jochen Profit
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Kathryn Melsop
3   California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Taylor Brown
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Alexis Davis
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
,
Elliot Main
3   California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative, Stanford, California
,
Henry C. Lee
2   Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 March 2016

21 June 2016

Publication Date:
03 August 2016 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to assess utilization of specialist coverage and checklists in perinatal settings and to examine utilization by birth asphyxia rates.

Design This is a survey study of California maternity hospitals concerning checklist use to prepare for delivery room resuscitation and 24-hour in-house specialist coverage (pediatrician/neonatologist, obstetrician, and obstetric anesthesiologist) and results linked to hospital birth asphyxia rates (preterm and low weight births were excluded).

Results Of 253 maternity hospitals, 138 responded (55%); 59 (43%) indicated checklist use, and in-house specialist coverage ranged from 38% (pediatrician/neonatologist) to 54% (anesthesiology). In-house coverage was more common in urban versus rural hospitals for all specialties (p < 0.0001), but checklist use was not significantly different (p = 0.88). Higher birth volume hospitals had more specialist coverage (p < 0.0001), whereas checklist use did not differ (p = 0.3). In-house obstetric coverage was associated with lower asphyxia rates (odds ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20, 0.58) in a regression model accounting for other providers. Checklist use was not associated with birth asphyxia (odds ratio: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.68).

Conclusion Higher birth volume and urban hospitals demonstrated greater in-house specialist coverage, but checklist use was similar across all hospitals. Current data suggest that in-house obstetric coverage has greater impact on asphyxia than other specialist coverage or checklist use.

Keywords

checklists - neonatal resuscitation - specialist coverage - birth asphyxia - safety

Note

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose. The funders (NICHD) had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the article; and decision to submit the article for publication. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Stanford University. The authors thank Lisa Bollman of the Regional Perinatal Programs of California for assistance in obtaining data across California maternity hospitals.


 

  • References

  • 1 MacDorman MF, Matthews TJ, Mohangoo AD, Zeitlin J. International comparisons of infant mortality and related factors: United States and Europe, 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2014; 63 (5) 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Snowden JM, Cheng YW, Kontgis CP, Caughey AB. The association between hospital obstetric volume and perinatal outcomes in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207 (6) 478.e1-478.e7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kracer B, Hintz SR, Van Meurs KP, Lee HC. Hypothermia therapy for neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in the state of California. J Pediatr 2014; 165 (2) 267-273
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lee HC, Chitkara R, Halamek LP, Hintz SR. A national survey of pediatric residents and delivery room training experience. J Pediatr 2010; 157 (1) 158-161.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Jukkala AM, Henly SJ. Provider readiness for neonatal resuscitation in rural hospitals. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2009; 38 (4) 443-452
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hales BM, Pronovost PJ. The checklist—a tool for error management and performance improvement. J Crit Care 2006; 21 (3) 231-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gawande AA, Arriaga AF. A simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (15) 1460 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1204720.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Winters BD, Gurses AP, Lehmann H, Sexton JB, Rampersad CJ, Pronovost PJ. Clinical review: checklists - translating evidence into practice. Crit Care 2009; 13 (6) 210 DOI: 10.1186/cc7792.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Spector JM, Agrawal P, Kodkany B , et al. Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: prospective pilot study of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program. PLoS ONE 2012; 7 (5) e35151 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035151.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Berglund S, Norman M, Grunewald C, Pettersson H, Cnattingius S. Neonatal resuscitation after severe asphyxia—a critical evaluation of 177 Swedish cases. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97 (6) 714-719
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mitchell A, Niday P, Boulton J, Chance G, Dulberg C. A prospective clinical audit of neonatal resuscitation practices in Canada. Adv Neonatal Care 2002; 2 (6) 316-326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gajic O, Afessa B, Hanson AC , et al. Effect of 24-hour mandatory versus on-demand critical care specialist presence on quality of care and family and provider satisfaction in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (1) 36-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Afessa B. Intensive care unit physician staffing: seven days a week, 24 hours a day. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (3) 894-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Li TC, Phillips MC, Shaw L, Cook EF, Natanson C, Goldman L. On-site physician staffing in a community hospital intensive care unit. Impact on test and procedure use and on patient outcome. JAMA 1984; 252 (15) 2023-2027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Arabi Y, Alshimemeri A, Taher S. Weekend and weeknight admissions have the same outcome of weekday admissions to an intensive care unit with onsite intensivist coverage. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (3) 605-611
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Leapfrog Hospital Survey. FACT SHEET: ICU Physician Staffing 2014. Available at: http://www.leapfroggroup.org/Hospitals/SurveyInfo/leapfrog_safety_practices/icu_physician_staffing . Accessed August 24, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 American Hospital Association. The Opportunities and Challenges for Rural Hospitals in an Era of Health Reform. Trendwatch [Internet]. 2011. Available at: https://aharesourcecenter.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/opportunites-and-challenges-for-rural-hospitals-in-an-era-of-health-reform/ . August 24, 2015
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gamm LD, Hutchinson LL, Dabney BJ, Dorsey AM , eds. Rural Healthy People 2010: A Companion Document to Healthy People 2010. Volume 1. College Station, TX: The Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, School of Rural Public Health, Southwest Rural Health Research Center; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Reschovsky JD, Staiti AB. Access and Quality of Medical Care in Urban and Rural Areas: Does Rural America Lag Behind?. Working Paper, Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, D.C.: 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH. The effects of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 1996; 276 (13) 1054-1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hoehner C, Kelsey A, El-Beltagy N, Artal R, Leet T. Cesarean section in term breech presentations: do rates of adverse neonatal outcomes differ by hospital birth volume?. J Perinat Med 2006; 34 (3) 196-202
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Chung JH, Phibbs CS, Boscardin WJ, Kominski GF, Ortega AN, Needleman J. The effect of neonatal intensive care level and hospital volume on mortality of very low birth weight infants. Med Care 2010; 48 (7) 635-644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar