J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32(05): 402-410
DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579536
Original Article: WSRM 2015 Scientific Paper
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Microsurgical Reconstruction of Plantar Ulcers of the Insensate Foot

Dinesh Kadam
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, A.J. Institute of Medical Sciences and A.J. Hospital & Research Centre, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 October 2015

09 January 2016

Publication Date:
24 February 2016 (online)

Abstract

Background Plantar, neuropathic, or trophic ulcers are often found in patients with decreased sensation in the foot. These ulcers can be complicated by infection, deformity, and increased patient morbidity. Excision results in wider defects and local tissues are often insufficient for reconstruction

Methods Total 26 free flaps were used in 25 patients to reconstruct plantar ulcers between years 2007 and 2013. The etiology included diabetic neuropathy (n = 13), leprosy (n = 3), spinal/peripheral nerve injury (n = 7), spina bifida (n = 1), and peripheral neuropathy (n = 1). The duration of the ulcer ranged from 1 to 18 years. Fifteen patients had associated systemic comorbidities and six had previous attempts. Free flaps used in reconstruction were the anterolateral thigh flap (n = 18), radial artery forearm flap (n = 4), and the gracilis muscle flap (n = 4). Recipient vessels were the posterior tibial artery (end to side) in 19 and the dorsalis pedis artery in 7.

Results The average age at presentation was 44.6 years with mean duration of ulcer of 5.8 years predominantly located over weight-bearing areas. Mean size of ulcer was 59.45 cm2 and mean follow-up period was 48 months. All flaps survived except a partial loss. Average time to resume ambulation was 6 weeks. Three patients had recurrence with mean follow-up of 48 months. Secondary flap reduction and bony resection was done in four.

Conclusion Microvascular reconstruction of the sole has advantages of vascularity, adequate tissue, and leaving rest of the foot undisturbed for offloading. Three significant local conditions influencing selection and transfer of the flap include (1) distally located forefoot ulcers, (2) extensive subcutaneous fibrosis secondary to frequent inflammation, and (3) Charcot arthropathy. In our series, the anterolateral thigh flap is our first choice for reconstruction of these defects.

TECHNICAL NOTE: All the patients were operated by the author under epidural/regional anesthesia except in spinal injury. The ulcers were adequately debrided until the healthy tissue margin and bone. Recipient vessels were either posterior tibial or dorsalis pedis, chosen on the basis of the proximity to the pedicle of the flap. Patency of the artery was confirmed by palpation and adequate flow on arteriotomy. Based on the defect size, location, and availability of recipient vessel, we chose the free flaps that include ALT flap, radial artery forearm flap, and gracilis muscle with skin graft. The ALT flap harvested from the contralateral thigh was able to provide good coverage for wounds located in the heel. The radial forearm flap was used for the defects in the region of the metatarsal heads and forefoot. The gracilis flap was used in large defects of the sole involving multiple weight-bearing areas particularly with bony cavities that were osteomyelitic. A suprafascial dissection was used for the radial forearm flap harvest and the fascia was excised in the case of the ALT flap. The defects in most of the cases were conical in cross section with a wider base. This necessitated a de-epithelialization of the flap margins to maximize the contact with the native skin and withstand the shearing stresses. An end-to-side anastomosis was performed whenever posterior tibial vessel was used, thus preserving the continuity of the artery. Donor sites were closed primarily for the gracilis and anterolateral flap and with a skin graft for the radial forearm flap. Postoperatively the patients were monitored closely for flap vascularity, Limb elevation was given for 2 weeks postoperatively. A protective splint was used for a period of 4 weeks, following which they were made ambulant. Elastic compression bandage was advised for 6 months following splint removal. Ambulation without assistance was allowed following 6 weeks.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lang-Stevenson AI, Sharrard WJ, Betts RP, Duckworth T. Neuropathic ulcers of the foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67 (3) 438-442
  • 2 Brand PW. Management of the insensitive limb. Phys Ther 1979; 59 (1) 8-12
  • 3 Brand PW. Pressure sores—the problem. In: Kenedi RM, Cowden JM, eds. Bedsore Biomechanics. Baltimore, MD: University Press; 1976: 19-23
  • 4 Mueller MJ, Zou D, Bohnert KL, Tuttle LJ, Sinacore DR. Plantar stresses on the neuropathic foot during barefoot walking. Phys Ther 2008; 88 (11) 1375-1384
  • 5 Bauman JH, Girling JP, Brand PW. Plantar pressures and trophic ulceration. An evaluation of footwear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1963; 45 (4) 652-673
  • 6 Bacarin TA, Sacco ICN, Hennig EM. Plantar pressure distribution patterns during gait in diabetic neuropathy patients with a history of foot ulcers. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009; 64 (2) 113-120
  • 7 Wei JW, Ni JD, Dong ZG, Liu LH, Luo ZB, Zheng L. Distally based perforator-plus sural fasciocutaneous flap for soft-tissue reconstruction of the distal lower leg, ankle, and foot: comparison between pediatric and adult patients. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (4) 249-254
  • 8 Cavanagh PR, Bus SA. Off-loading the diabetic foot for ulcer prevention and healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (Suppl. 01) 248S-256S
  • 9 Medina III MA, Salinas HM, Eberlin KR , et al. Jr Modified free radial forearm fascia flap reconstruction of lower extremity and foot wounds: optimal contour and minimal donor-site morbidity. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (4) 249-254
  • 10 Perry J. Anatomy and biomechanics of the hindfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983; (177) 9-15
  • 11 Hong JP. Reconstruction of the diabetic foot using the anterolateral thigh perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (5) 1599-1608
  • 12 Lin CH, Mardini S, Wei FC, Lin YT, Chen CT. Free flap reconstruction of foot and ankle defects in pediatric patients: long-term outcome in 91 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (7) 2478-2487
  • 13 Fox CM, Beem HM, Wiper J, Rozen WM, Wagels M, Leong JC. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in heel reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (1) 59-66
  • 14 Malluf KS, Mueller MJ. Comparison of physical activities and cumulative plantar tissue stress among subjects with and without diabetes mellitus and a history of recurrent plantar ulcers. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2001; 16: 719-727
  • 15 Goldberg JA, Adkins P, Tsai TM. Microvascular reconstruction of the foot: weight-bearing patterns, gait analysis, and long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92 (5) 904-911
  • 16 Sönmez A, Bayramiçli M, Sönmez B, Numanoğlu A. Reconstruction of the weight-bearing surface of the foot with nonneurosensory free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111 (7) 2230-2236
  • 17 Aszmann OC, Kress KM, Dellon AL. Results of decompression of peripheral nerves in diabetics: a prospective, blinded study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (4) 816-822