The Problem of the Pannus: Physician Preference Survey and a Review of the Literature on Cesarean Skin Incision in Morbidly Obese Women

Abstract

Objective This study aims to determine preferences of a nationally representative sample of obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs) regarding cesarean delivery (CD) incision practices for women with morbid obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m²).

Study Design We conducted an online survey using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists database. We compared physician demographics, practice characteristics, and CD incision type preference.

Results After exclusion of ineligible participants, 247 OB/GYNs completed the survey (42% response rate). In nonemergency CD of morbidly obese women, 84% of physicians preferred a Pfannenstiel skin incision (67% preferring taping the pannus; 17% without taping the pannus). In emergency CD, 66% preferred a Pfannenstiel incision (46% without taping the pannus; 20% with taping the pannus) and 20% a vertical incision. For both emergency and nonemergency CD, there was no difference in incision type preferences by provider years in practice, practice scope, or number of CD performed each year.

Conclusion Given the preference of a Pfannenstiel incision with taping the pannus during CD of morbidly obese women, further investigation is needed to assess the risks and benefits of this incision and the practice of elevating the pannus.

Keywords

morbid obesity - postcesarean section - postoperative complication

• References

• 1 Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA 2012; 307 (5) 491-497
• 2 Kominiarek MA, Vanveldhuisen P, Hibbard J , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (3) 264.e1-264.e7
• 3 Heslehurst N, Simpson H, Ells LJ , et al. The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2008; 9 (6) 635-683
• 4 Stamilio DM, Scifres CM. Extreme obesity and postcesarean maternal complications. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (2 Pt 1): 227-232
• 5 Roofthooft E. Anesthesia for the morbidly obese parturient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22 (3) 341-346
• 6 Hall LF, Neubert AG. Obesity and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005; 60 (4) 253-260
• 7 Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ, Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4) 294-306
• 8 Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (3) 271.e1-271.e7
• 9 Vermillion ST, Lamoutte C, Soper DE, Verdeja A. Wound infection after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95 (6 Pt 1): 923-926
• 10 Bell J, Bell S, Vahratian A, Awonuga AO. Abdominal surgical incisions and perioperative morbidity among morbidly obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011; 154 (1) 16-19
• 11 Wall PD, Deucy EE, Glantz JC, Pressman EK. Vertical skin incisions and wound complications in the obese parturient. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (5 Pt 1): 952-956
• 12 Smid MC, Kearney MS, Stamilio DM. Extreme obesity and post cesarean wound complications in the MFMU Cesarean registry. Am J Perinatol 2015; ; In press
• 13 Brocato BE, Thorpe Jr EM, Gomez LM, Wan JY, Mari G. The effect of cesarean delivery skin incision approach in morbidly obese women on the rate of classical hysterotomy. J Pregnancy 2013; 2013: 890296
• 14 Edwards RK, Cantu J, Cliver S, Biggio Jr JR, Owen J, Tita AT. The association of maternal obesity with fetal pH and base deficit at cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (2 Pt 1): 262-267
• 15 Houston MC, Raynor BD. Postoperative morbidity in the morbidly obese parturient woman: supraumbilical and low transverse abdominal approaches. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182 (5) 1033-1035
• 16 Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief 2010; x (35) 1-8
• 17 McLean M, Hines R, Polinkovsky M, Stuebe A, Thorp J, Strauss R. Type of skin incision and wound complications in the obese parturient. Am J Perinatol 2012; 29 (4) 301-306
• 18 Thornburg LL, Linder MA, Durie DE, Walker B, Pressman EK, Glantz JC. Risk factors for wound complications in morbidly obese women undergoing primary cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25 (9) 1544-1548
• 19 Marrs CC, Moussa HN, Sibai BM, Blackwell SC. The relationship between primary cesarean delivery skin incision type and wound complications in women with morbid obesity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210 (4) 319.e1-319.e4
• 20 Tixier H, Thouvenot S, Coulange L , et al. Cesarean section in morbidly obese women: supra or subumbilical transverse incision?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009; 88 (9) 1049-1052
• 21 Thornton YS. Caesarean delivery and celiotomy using panniculus retraction in the morbidly obese patient. J Am Coll Surg 2001; 193 (4) 458-461