Synlett 2016; 27(01): 11-16
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1560723
letter
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

A Fluorogenic Screening for Enantio- and Diastereoselectivity of 2-Deoxy-d-ribose-5-phosphate Aldolases

Carolin Bisterfeld
a   Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University at Forschungszentrum Jülich, and Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), 52426 Jülich, Germany
,
Irene Küberl née Kullartz
a   Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University at Forschungszentrum Jülich, and Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), 52426 Jülich, Germany
,
Markus Dick
a   Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University at Forschungszentrum Jülich, and Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), 52426 Jülich, Germany
,
Jörg Pietruszka*
a   Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University at Forschungszentrum Jülich, and Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), 52426 Jülich, Germany
b   Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, Germany   Email: j.pietruszka@fz-juelich.de
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 03 September 2015

Accepted after revision: 25.09.201

Publication Date:
13 October 2015 (online)


Dedicated to Prof. Steven V. Ley on the occasion of his 70th birthday

Abstract

A highly sensitive, fluorescence-based selectivity screening system for 2-deoxy-d-ribose-5-phosphate aldolases was realized by installing short, straightforward syntheses to fluorophore-coupled carbohydrates as d-ribose, l-ribose, and d-xylose. The substrates allow the simultaneous determination of enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity of DERA-catalyzed aldol reactions.

Supporting Information

 
  • References and Notes

  • 1 Authors contributed equally.
    • 2a Hu S, Zhang L, Li J, Luo S, Cheng J.-P. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011; 3347
    • 2b Hayashi Y, Itoh T, Aratake S, Ishikawa H. Angew. Chem. 2008; 120: 2112
    • 2c Denmark SE, Stavenger RA. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000; 33: 432
    • 2d List B, Lerner RA, Barbas CF. III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000; 122: 2395
    • 2e Mukaiyama T In Organic Reactions. John Wiley and Sons; New York: 2004
    • 3a Masamune S, Choy W, Petersen JS, Sita LR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1985; 24: 1
    • 3b Notz W, Tanaka F, Barbas CF. III. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004; 37: 580
    • 3c Paterson I, Goodman JM, Anne Lister M, Schumann RC, McClure CK, Norcross RD. Tetrahedron 1990; 46: 4663
    • 3d Machajewski TD, Wong C.-H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000; 39: 1352
    • 4a Clapés P, Garrabou X. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011; 353: 2263
    • 4b Brovetto M, Gamenara D, Saenz Méndez P, Seoane GA. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2011; 111: 4346
    • 4c Dean SM, Greenberg WA, Wong C.-H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007; 349: 1308
    • 4d Fessner W.-D, Helaine V. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001; 12: 574
    • 5a Liu J, Hsu C.-C, Wong C.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004; 45: 2439
    • 5b Gijsen HJ. M, Wong C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994; 116: 8422
    • 5c Liu J, Wong C.-H. Angew. Chem. 2002; 114: 1462
    • 5d Patel JM. J. Mol. Catal. B 2009; 61: 123
    • 6a Clapés P, Fessner W.-D, Sprenger GA, Samland AK. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010; 14: 154
    • 6b Wolberg M, Dassen BH. N, Schürmann M, Jennewein S, Wubbolts MG, Schoemaker HE, Mink D. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008; 350: 1751
  • 7 Jennewein S, Schürmann M, Wolberg M, Hilker I, Luiten R, Wubbolts M, Mink D. Biotechnol. J. 2006; 1: 537
    • 8a Pricer WE, Horecker BL. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 1960; 235: 1292
    • 8b Sgarrella F, Del Corso A, Tozzi MG, Camici M. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 1992; 1118: 130
    • 8c Han TK, Zhu Z, Dao ML. Curr. Microbiol. 2004; 48: 230
    • 8d Kim Y.-M, Chang Y.-H, Choi N.-S, Kim Y, Song JJ, Kim JS. Protein Expression Purif. 2009; 68: 196
    • 8e Jiao X.-C, Pan J, Xu G.-C, Kong X.-D, Chen Q, Zhang Z.-J, Xu J.-H. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015; 5: 4048
    • 9a Wahler D, Reymond J.-L. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001; 12: 535
    • 9b Rogers MV. Drug Discovery Today 1997; 2: 156
    • 9c Liebl W, Angelov A, Juergensen J, Chow J, Loeschcke A, Drepper T, Classen T, Pietruszka J, Ehrenreich A, Streit WR, Jaeger K.-E. Appl. Microbial. Biotechnol. 2014; 98: 8099
  • 10 Jourdain N, Carlón RP, Reymond J.-L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 9415
  • 11 Greenberg WA, Varvak A, Hanson SR, Wong K, Huang H, Chen P, Burk MJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004; 101: 5788
  • 12 Fei H, Xu G, Wu J.-P, Yang L.-R. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015; 460: 826
  • 13 Deriaz RE, Overend WG, Stacey M, Wiggins LF. J. Chem. Soc. 1949; 2836
  • 14 (3S,4R)-4-(Hydroxymethyl)-1-methoxytetrahydrofuran-3-ol (d-12) and (3R,4S)-4-(Hydroxymethyl)-1-methoxytetrahydrofuran-3-ol (l-12) 2-Deoxy-d-ribose (d-11, 0.5 g, 3.7 mmol) were dissolved in methanolic HCl (10 mL, 0.1%) and stirred at r.t. for 12 min. The reaction was controlled by rotary power and after full conversion neutralized with Ag2CO3. The mixture was filtrated, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was purified by Kugelrohr distillation; 506 mg (92%, dr A/B = 0.6:0.4) d-12 were isolated as a colorless oil. Analogously 100 mg (0.75 mmol) 2-desoxy-l-ribose (l-11) were converted into 116 mg (0.78 mmol, quantitative yield, dr A/B = 0.6:0.4) l-12. Rf = 0.06 (PE–EtOAc, 40:60). IR (film): ν = 3383, 2918, 1444, 1206, 1050 cm–1. GC–MS (EI, +, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 147 (1) [M + H]+, 117 (100) [C5H9O3]+, 88 (52) [C5H10O]+, 71 (26) [C4H8O]+. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.00 (m, 1 H, 2b-HA), 2.08–2.14 (m, 3 H, 2b-HB, 2a-HA, 3-OHA), 2.26 (ddd, J = 13.9, 6.9, 2.0 Hz, 1 H, 2a-HB), 2.50 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1 H, 3-OHB), 2.78 (m, 1 H, 5-OHB), 2.90 (d, J = 10.23 Hz, 1 H, 5-OHA), 3.38 (mc, 6 H, OMeA, OMeB), 3.58–3.73 (m, 4 H, 5a-HA, 5a-HB, 5b-HA, 5b-HB), 4.05 (ddd, J = 3.5 Hz, 1 H, 4-HB), 4.10–4.17 (m, 2 H, 4-HA, 3-HA), 4.51 (ddd, J = 8.4, 6.9, 3.5 Hz, 1 H, 3-HB), 5.10 (dd, J = 4.5, 0.2 Hz, 1 H, 1-HA), 5.11 (dd, J = 5.7, 2.0 Hz, 1 H, 1-HB) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 41.5 (C-2A), 42.5 (C-2B), 54.9 (OMeA), 55.4 (OMeB), 63.1 (C-5A), 63.5 (C-5B), 72.1 (C-3B), 72.8 (C-3A), 87.4 (C-4A), 87.5 (C-4B), 105.5 (C-1A), 105.6 (C-1B) ppm. HRMS (ESI, +): m/z (%) calcd for C6H12O4Na [M + Na]+: 171.06333; found: 171.06275. d-12: [α]D +39.4 (c 1.0, CHCl3); lit.13 [α]D +38.4 (c 0.6, CH3COOH). l-12: [α]D 40 (c 0.93, CHCl3)
  • 15 [(3S,4R)-3-Hydroxy-1-methoxytetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methyl p-Tosylate (d-13) and [(3R,4S)-3-Hydroxy-1-methoxy-tetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methyl p-Tosylate (l-13) Under an argon atmosphere d-12 (4.20 g, 28.4 mmol) was dissolved in pyridine (100 mL) and cooled to –5 °C. A solution of p-TsCl (5.22 g, 27.4 mmol, 1.00 equiv) in dry CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was added dropwise. The temperature of the reaction was maintained between –5 °C and 0 °C. The reaction was stirred for 1 h at 0 °C, warmed up to r.t. and stirred overnight. The conversion was controlled by TLC. Ice-cold H2O (130 mL) and EtOAc were added, and the reaction was extracted with a sat. CuSO4 solution. The aqueous phases were combined and extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic phases were dried over MgSO4 and filtered. The solvent was evaporated, and the crude product was purified by column chromatography (PE–EtOAc, 70:30); 5.60 g (18.5 mmol, 65%, dr A/B = 0.7:0.3) of d-13 were isolated as a colorless oil. Analogously 1.00 g (8.75 mmol) of l-12 were converted into 1.40 g (4.63 mmol, 68%, dr A/B = 0.7:0.3) of the colorless oil l-13. Rf = 1.9 (PE–EtOAc, 40:60). IR (film): ν = 3454, 2928, 1598, 1444, 1180, 1096, 665 cm–1. GC–MS (EI, +, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 301 (1) [M – H]+, 271 (1) [M – OCH3]+, 91 (71) [C7H8]+. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.03–2.10 (m, 3 H, 2a-HB, 2b-HA, 2b-HB), 2.21 (ddd, J = 13.4, 6.8, 1.7 Hz, 1 H, 2a-HA), 2.45 (s, 6 H, MeA, MeB), 3.23 (s, 3 H, OMeB), 3.34 (s, 3 H, OMeA), 4.02–4.13 (m, 6 H, 5-HA, 5-HB, 4-HA, 4-HB), 4.20 (ddd, J = 4.06, 4.02, 1.7 Hz, 1 H, 3-HA), 4.43 (ddd, J = 6.6, 6.5 Hz, 3.4 Hz, 1 H, 3-HB), 5.01–5.04 (m, 2 H, 1-HA, 1-HB), 7.33–7.37 (m, 4 H, 3′-HA, 3′-HB), 7.76–7.83 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 4 H, 2′-HA, 2′-HB) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 21.7 (Me), 41.0 (C-2A/B), 41.4 (C-2A/B), 55.0 (OMeA/B), 55.1 (OMeA/B), 69.4 (C-1′A/B), 70.1 (C-1′A/B), 72.7 (C-3A/B), 72.8 (C-3A/B), 83.0 (C-5/C-4), 84.6 (C-5/C-4), 106.4 (C-1A/B), 106.7 (C-1A/B), 128.0 (C-2′), 130.0 (C-3′), 145.1 (C-4′) ppm. HRMS (ESI, +): m/z (%) calcd for C13H18O6SNa [M + Na]+: 325.07218; found: 325.07163. d-13 [α]D +30 (c 0.6, CHCl3). l-13 [α]D –31.5 (c 0.9, CHCl3)
  • 16 7-{[(3S,4R)-1,3-Dihydroxytetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methoxy}-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (d-5) and 7-{[(3R,4S)-1,3-Dihydroxytetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methoxy}-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (l-5) Compound d-13 (7.00 g, 23.2 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (70 mL). K2CO3 (7.00 g, 50.6 mmol) and 4-methylumbelliferone (5.30 g, 30.0 mmol, 1.3 equiv) were added. The reaction was stirred for 16 h at 75 °C, then quenched with H2O (70 mL), extracted with EtOAc and washed with 0.1 M NaOH. The organic phase was dried over MgSO4 and filtered. The solvent was evaporated. The crude product was dissolved in MeCN–H2O (150 mL, 1:3), mixed with DOWEX 50WX 8-100 (4.5 g), stirred for 1.5 h, and stored for 2 d at r.t. Resulting MeOH was evaporated. The solution was filtered, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (gradient PE–EtOAc, 70:30 → 40:60 → 10:90 → 0:100) yielding 6.40 g (21.9 mmol, 88%, dr A/B 0.8:0.2) d-5. Analogously 115 mg (0.38 mmol) of l-13 was converted into 97 mg (0.33 mmol, 87%, dr A/B 0.8:0.2) l-5. Rf = 0.09 (n-pentane–EtOAc, 20:80). IR (film): ν = 3450, 2928, 1736, 1611, 1366, 1216 cm–1. GC–MS (EI, +, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 293 (100) [M + H]+, 246 (10) [C14H14O4]+. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.17–2.21 (m, 1 H, 2′a-HB), 2.24 (ddd, J = 13.9, 5.9, 4.6 Hz, 1 H, 2′a-HA), 2.32–2.37 (m, 2 H, 2′b-HA,B), 2.39 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 6 H, MeA,B), 3.99 (dd, J = 10.0, 4.7 Hz, 1 H, 5′a-HA), 4.06 (dd, J = 10.0, 4.8 Hz, 1 H, 5′b-HA), 4.18 (dd, J = 5.3, 5.3 Hz, 1 H, 5′a-HB), 4.26 (dd, J = 5.3, 4.9 Hz, 1 H, 5′b-HB), 4.42 (ddd, J = 5.9, 1.5, 1.4 Hz, 1 H, 3′-HA), 4.47 (ddd, J = 4.6, 4.5, 2.1 Hz, 1 H, 3′-HB), 4.59 (ddd, J = 4.8, 4.7, 1.5 Hz, 1 H, 4′-HA), 4.64 (ddd, J = 5.3, 4.9, 4.6 Hz, 1 H, 4′-HB), 5.66 (dd, J = 4.6, 0.2 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HA), 5.67 (dd, J = 5.6, 2.5 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HB), 6.14 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2 H, 3-HA,B), 6.79 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 2 H, 8-HA,B), 6.85 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1 H, 6-HA), 6.89 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.6 Hz, 1 H, 6-HB), 7.48 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H, 5-HA,B) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 18.8 (Me), 41.6 (C-2′), 68.8 (C-5′), 73.5 (C-4′), 85.4 (C-3′), 99.8 (C-1′), 101.8 (C-8), 112.4 (C-3), 112.6 (C-6), 114.1 (C-4a), 125.8 (C-5), 152.7 (C-8a), 155.3 (C-7), 161.4 (C-2), 161.6 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, +): m/z (%) calcd for C15H17O6 [M + H]+: 293.10251; found: 293.10190. d-5 [α]D +30 (c 0.6, CHCl3). l- 5 [α]D –42.4 (c 0.23, CHCl3)
  • 17 7-[(3S,4R)-3-Hydroxy-1-methoxytetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methoxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (14) Compound d-13 (10 g, 33.1 mmol) was dissolved in DMF (25 mL). K2CO3 (2.5 g) and 4-methylumbelliferone (7.58 g, 43 mmol, 1.3 equiv) were added. The reaction was stirred for 16 h at 75 °C, then quenched with H2O, extracted with EtOAc, and washed with 0.1 M NaOH. The organic phase was dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (n-pentane–EtOAc, 50:50), yielding 8.33 g (27.2 mmol, 82%, dr A/B = 0.4:0.6) of 14 as a colorless oil. Rf = 0.33 (n-pentane–EtOAc, 20:80). IR (film): ν = 3586, 3322, 3093, 2923, 2838, 1709, 1613, 1389, 1369, 1294, 1150, 1069, 1027, 971, 838 cm–1. GC–MS (EI, +, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 133 (10) [C5H9O4]+, 147 (8) [C6H11O4]+. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.15 (ddd, J = 13.4, 6.4, 5.4 Hz, 1 H, 2′a-HA), 2.22 (ddd, J = 13.8, 6.4, 4.6 Hz, 2 H, 2′a-HB, 2′b-HB), 2.32 (ddd, J = 13.4, 6.4, 1.8 Hz, 1 H, 2′b-HA), 2.39 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 3 H, MeA,B), 3.33 (s, 3 H, OMeA), 3.42 (s, 3 H, OMeB), 4.03 (dd, J = 10.0, 4.5 Hz, 1 H, 5′a-HB), 4.07–4.13 (m, 3 H, 5′a-HA, 5′b-HA, 5′b-HB), 4.26 (ddd, J = 6.4, 6.4, 4.4 Hz, 1 H, 3′-HA), 4.30 (ddd, J = 6.4, 1.6, 1.5 Hz, 1 H, 3′-HB), 4.43 (ddd, J = 4.6, 4.5, 1.6 Hz, 1 H, 4′-HB), 4.57 (ddd, J = 6.7, 6.6, 4.4 Hz, 1 H, 4′-HA), 5.13 (dd, J = 5.4, 1.8 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HA), 5.16 (dd, J = 4.6, 0.2 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HB), 6.13 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 2 H, 3-HA,B), 6.81 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H, 8-HB), 6.84 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H, 8-HA), 6.86 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-HB), 6.89 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-HA), 7.48 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H, 5-HB), 7.49 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H, 5-HA) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 18.8 (Me), 41.2/41.7 (C-2′), 55.2/55.3 (OMe), 68.8/69.9 (C-5′), 73.0/73.3 (C-4′), 83.8/85.4 (C-3′), 101.7/101.8 (C-1′), 105.5/105.8 (C-8), 112.3/112.4 (C-3), 112.7 (C-6), 114.0/114.1 (C-4a), 125.7 (C-5), 152.6/152.7 (C-8a), 155.2/155.3 (C-7), 161.3/161.4 (C-2), 161.7/161.8 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, +): m/z (%) calcd for C16H20O6 [M + H]+: 307.11761; found: 307.11762. [α]D +29.8 (c 1.0, CDCl3)
  • 18 Dess DB, Martin JC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991; 113: 7277
  • 19 7-[(4R)-1-Methoxy-3-oxotetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methoxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (15) To a solution of DMP (10.4 g, 24.5 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (300 mL) compound 14 (5 g, 16.3 mmol) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (25 mL) were added. The reaction was stirred for 2 h at r.t. before it was quenched with 1 M Na2S2O3 solution (100 mL). Sat. NaHCO3 solution (100 mL) was added, and the reaction was stirred until both phases were clear. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and H2O, the phases were separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with CH2Cl2. The organic phases were combined, dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (PE–EtOAc, 60:40) yielding 3.97 g (13.1 mmol, 80%, dr A/B 0.7:0.3) of product 15. Rf = 0.49 (PE–EtOAc, 50:50). IR (film): ν = 3079, 2939, 2359, 1752, 1707, 1610, 1391, 1268, 1087, 1063, 1016, 982, 953, 833, 806 cm–1. GC–MS (EI, +, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 58 (100) [C3H6O]+. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.38 (d, J = 1.19 Hz, 3 H, MeB), 2.39 (d, J = 1.28 Hz, 3 H, MeB), 2.50 (dd, J = 18.21, 0.32 Hz, 1 H, 2′a-HB), 2.52 (dd, J = 18.14, 1.12 Hz, 1 H, 2′a-HA), 2.74 (dd, J = 18.21, 5.61 Hz, 1 H, 2′b-HB), 2.83 (dd, J = 18.14, 5.58 Hz, 1 H, 2′b-HA), 3.42 (s, 3 H, OMeA), 3.48 (s, 3 H, OMeB), 4.15 (dd, J = 10.3, 7.27 Hz, 1 H, 4′-HA), 4.26–4.34 (m, 4 H, 5′a-HA, 5′’a-HB, 5′’b-HB, 4′-HB), 4.44 (dd, J = 7.27, 3.17 Hz, 1 H, 5′b-HA), 5.40 (dd, J = 5.58, 1.12 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HA), 5.43 (dd, J = 5.61, 0.32 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HB), 6.14 (mc, 2 H, 3-HA,B), 6.83 (d, J = 2.88 Hz, 1 H, 8-HB), 6.84 (d, J = 2.42 Hz, 1 H, 8-HA), 6.84 (dd, J = 8.67, 2.88 Hz, 1 H, 6-HB), 6.90 (dd, J = 8.84, J = 2.42, 1 H, 6-HA), 7.48 (d, J = 8.67 Hz, 1 H, 5-HB), 7.50 (d, J = 8.84 Hz, 1 H, 5-HA) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 18.7 (Me), 43.6 (C-2′A), 43.7 (C-2′B), 55.2 (OMeA), 55.3 (OMeB), 67.2 (C-4′B), 69.5 (C-4′A), 76.1 (C-5′B), 78.0 (C-5′A), 101.6 (C-8B), 101.9 (C-8A), 101.9 (C-1′B), 102.7 (C-1′A), 112.3 (C-3A), 112.4 (C-3A), 112.5 (C-4aA,B), 114.1 (C-6A), 114.2 (C-6B), 125.6 (C-5B), 125.7 (C-5A), 152.5 (C-4A,B), 155.1 (C-8aB), 155.2 (C-8aA), 161.2 (C-7A,B), 161.3 (C-2B), 161.4 (C-2A), 210.6 (C-3′A), 210.8 (C-3′B) ppm. HRMS (ESI, +): m/z (%) calcd for C16H18O6 [M + H]+: 305.10196; found: 305.10199. [α]D +44.5 (c 1.1, MeCN).
  • 20 7-[(3R,4R)-3-Hydroxy-1-methoxytetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methoxy-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (16) Compound 15 (3.97 g 13.1 mmol) was dissolved in EtOH–H2O (1:1) and cooled to 0 °C. NaBH4 (1.23 g, 32.7 mmol, 2.5 equiv) was added, and the reaction was stirred for 1 h at r.t. The reaction was quenched with a sat. NH4Cl solution and extracted with CHCl3. The organic phases were washed with H2O, dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was evaporated. The diastereomers (dr 1:1) could be separated by column chromatography (PE–EtOAc, 50:50); 1.45 g (4.73 mmol, 36%) of the desired diastereomer 16 were isolated. Rf = 0.17 (PE–EtOAc, 50:50). IR (film): ν = 3395, 3060, 2946, 1716, 1609, 1370, 1208 cm–1. GC–MS (EI, +, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 133 (19) [(C5H9O4)+], 147 (8) [(C6H11O4)+]. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.13–2.21 (m, 2 H, 2′-H), 2.37 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3 H, Me), 2.96 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, 1 H, 3′-OH), 3.38 (s, 3 H, OMe), 4.19 (dd, J = 9.7, 6.8 Hz, 1 H, 5′a-H), 4.34 (ddd, J = 6.8, 4.1 Hz, 1 H, 4′-H), 4.36–4.41 (m, 2 H, 5′b-H, 3′-H), 5.11 (dd, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H, 1′-H), 6.10 (q, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H, 3-H), 6.87 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H, 8-H), 6.90 (dd, J = 8.8, 2.5 Hz, 1 H, 6-H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H, 5-H) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 18.8 (Me), 41.5 (C-2′), 55.3 (OMe), 69.0 (C-5′), 71.6 (C-3′), 82.5 (C-4′), 101.9 (C-8), 105.5 (C-1′), 112.2 (C-3), 112.6 (C-6), 113.9 (C-4a), 125.7 (C-5), 152.6 (C-4), 155.3 (C-8a), 161.4 (C-7), 161.9 (C-2) ppm. HRMS (ESI, +): m/z (%) calcd for C16H20O6 [M + H]+: 307.11761; found: 307.11769. [α]D –67.4 (c 1.0, CHCl3).
  • 21 7-{[(3R,4R)-1,3-Dihydroxytetrahydrofuran-4-yl]methoxy}-4-methyl-2H-chromen-2-one (6) Compound 15 (980 mg, 3.2 mmol) was dissolved in MeCN–H2O (3:1). DOWEX 50WX 8-100 (130 mg) was added, and the reaction was stirred for 1.5 h at r.t. Resulting MeOH was evaporated, and the mixture was stored at r.t. for 2 d. The solution was filtered, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was purified by column chromatography (PE–EtOAc, 70:30) yielding 544 mg (1.86 mmol, 58%, dr A/B 0.7:0.3) of product 6 as a white solid. Rf = 0.06 (PE–EtOAc, 50:50). IR (film): ν = 3356, 1705, 1609, 1364, 1207 cm–1. GC–MS (EI, +, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 293 (100) [M + H]+, 246 (12) [C14H14O4]+. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.19 (ddd, J = 13.8, 4.6, 4.6 Hz, 1 H, 2′a-HA), 2.23–2.32 (m, 3 H, 2′b-HA, 2′a-HB, 2′b-HB), 2.40 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 6 H, MeA,B), 4.28 (dd, J = 10.0 Hz, J = 6.2 Hz, 1 H, 5′a-HB), 4.30–4.34 (m, 3 H, 5′a-HB, 5′a-HA, 5′b-HA), 4.35 (dd, J = 6.9, 3.9 Hz, 1 H, 3′-HB), 4.42 (d, J = 8.6, 4.6 Hz, 1 H, 3′-HA),4.50–4.54 (m, 1 H, 4′-HA), 4.69 (ddd, J = 6.2, 3.9, 3.0 Hz, 1 H, 4′-HB), 5.61 (dd, J = 4.6, 0.3 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HA), 5.78 (dd, J = 5.4, 3.3 Hz, 1 H, 1′-HB), 6.14 (q, J = 1.3 Hz, 2 H, 3-HA,B), 6.89 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 2 H, 8-HA,B), 6.91 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.5 Hz, 2 H, 6-HA,B), 7.50 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2 H, 5-HA,B) ppm. 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 18.8 (Me), 42.1 (C-2′), 68.8 (C-5′), 71.9 (C-4′), 82.3 (C-3′), 99.4 (C-1′), 102.0 (C-8), 112.4 (C-3), 112.5 (C-6), 114.1 (C-4a), 125.8 (C-5), 152.7 (C-8a), 155.3 (C-7), 161.4 (C-2), 161.8 (C-4) ppm. HRMS (ESI, +): m/z (%) calcd for C16H20O6 [M + H]+: 293.10196; found: 293.10218. [α]D +11.5 (c 0.2, MeCN).
  • 22 Protocol of the Fluorogenic Assay Triethanolamine buffer (120 μL, 0.1 M, pH 7.0), the specific substrate (10 μL of a 10 mM solution), and BSA (10 μL of a solution 40 mg/mL in H2O) were pipetted in a 96-well microtiterplate. Cell-free crude lysate (60 μL) was added and then directly measured with a GENios Microtiterplate Reader (Tecan, Switzerland) for 1–2 h, applying an excitation wavelength of 340 nm and an emission wavelength of 460 nm with a band-width of 5 nm. For calibration a solution of 4-methylumbelliferone in MeCN was prepared and measured in triethanolamine buffer (using 0–2.5 nmol 4-methylumbelliferone). The calibration curve is shown in the Supporting Information.
  • 23 Protein Expression Genes, coding for DERA (de °C) from P. aerophilum, T. maritima and C. psychrerythraea were ordered as synthetic genes from GenScript, followed by cloning into the pET-21a(+)-vector. For S. halifaxensis, the corresponding gene could be isolated from genomic DNA, whereas de °C genes from E. coli and R. erythropolis were isolated previously.24 The proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) strain, using TB medium. Expression was started by applying 0.1 mM IPTG, and cells were harvested after 16 h (24 h for psychrophilic enzymes) incubation at 25 °C (18 °C); 1 g cells were resuspended in potassium phosphate (KPi) buffer (5 mL, 20 mM, pH 7). The cells were disrupted via sonification, and after centrifugation (15 min at 12000 × g) the supernatant was taken for kinetic measurements. A SDS-gel of all used proteins is shown in the Supporting Information.
  • 24 Kullartz I, Pietruszka J. J. Bioltechnol. 2012; 161: 174
  • 25 Sakuraba H, Yoneda K, Yoshihara K, Satoh K, Kawakami R, Uto Y, Tsuge H, Takahashi K, Hori H, Ohshima T. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007; 73: 7427
  • 26 Egorova K, Antranikian G. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2005; 8: 649
  • 27 Feller G. Scientifica 2013; 28
    • 28a Chen L, Dumas DP, Wong CH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992; 114: 741
    • 28b DeSantis G, Liu J, Clark DP, Heine A, Wilson IA, Wong C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003; 11: 43