Synthesis 2016; 48(02): 223-230
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1560374
paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Silver-Promoted Oxidative Ring Opening/Alkynylation of Cyclopropanols: Facile Synthesis of 4-Yn-1-ones

Cheng-Yong Wang
State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. of China   Email: jhli@hnu.edu.cn   Email: xieyexiang520@126.com
,
Ren-Jie Song
State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. of China   Email: jhli@hnu.edu.cn   Email: xieyexiang520@126.com
,
Ye-Xiang Xie*
State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. of China   Email: jhli@hnu.edu.cn   Email: xieyexiang520@126.com
,
Jin-Heng Li*
State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. of China   Email: jhli@hnu.edu.cn   Email: xieyexiang520@126.com
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 19 September 2015

Accepted after revision: 16 October 2015

Publication Date:
17 November 2015 (online)

 


Abstract

A new silver-promoted oxidative ring opening/alkynylation of cyclopropanols with ethynylbenziodoxolones (EBX) is described. This method enables the formation of alkylated alkynes via a sequence of ring opening and alkynylation. Control experiments support a radical mechanism in this silver-promoted method.


#

Alkynes are common and versatile building blocks with wide application in synthesis.[1] Therefore, the development of new efficient methods for their synthesis continues to receive the attention of synthetic chemists.[1] [2] [3] Although the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction,[2,3] which starts from aryl or alkenyl halides and terminal alkynes, is well-established for the incorporation of alkyne moieties into organic molecules, the synthesis of aliphatic alkynes from alkyl electrophiles remains a formidable challenge.[3] For example, the Fu group has extended the Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction to the use of primary alkyl halides as the electrophile.[3a] The Hu group has also reported an efficient nickel-catalyzed Sonogashira cross-coupling of alkyl halides for the construction of alkylated alkynes.[3b] [c] However, the majority of these transformations require a copper cocatalyst, base, and a ligand to improve the yield. To overcome these disadvantages, the development of new electrophilic alkynylating reagents, particularly with special reaction characteristics for the formation of the C(sp)–C(sp3) bond, have gained wide interest in the past decade.[4] [5] Typically, attractive electrophilic alkynylating reagents include ethynylbenziodoxolones (EBX),[4] which are appealing alkynylating reagents for the construction of diverse ynone molecules by C-alkynylation with aldehydes.

Herein, we report a new oxidative ring opening/alkynylation of cyclopropanols with ethynylbenziodoxolones for the synthesis of alkylated alkynes using a combination of silver(I) nitrate and potassium persulfate as the catalytic system (Scheme [1]);[6] this method allows selective radical cleavage of the C–C bond in a wide range of cyclopropanols[7] by various terminal alkynes, including aryl- and alkyl-substituted­ alkynes, and represents a mild and practical route for the assembly of alkylated alkynes.[8]

Zoom Image
Scheme 1 The ring opening and alkynylation reaction

We began our study by investigating the reaction between 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclopropan-1-ol (1a) and 1-(phenylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2a, Ph-EBX) to optimize the reaction conditions (Table [1]). The results demonstrated that the ring opening/alkynylation reaction occurred in the presence of silver(I) nitrate alone and it enabled the formation of the desired product 3aa in 33% yield (entry 1). Gratifyingly, the addition of oxidants, such as potassium persulfate, sodium persulfate, ammonium persulfate, and dibenzoyl peroxide (BPO), improved the yield of 3aa (entries 2–5), and potassium persulfate showed the most reactivity. Identical results to those obtained using two equivalents of potassium persulfate were obtained when using three equivalents of potassium persulfate (cf. entries 2 and 6). A number of other silver catalysts (entries 7–10), including silver(I) acetate, tetrafluoroborate, triflate, and carbonate, also had high catalytic activity in this reaction, but they were less effective than silver(I) nitrate. We found that the amount of silver(I) nitrate used also affected the reaction result: using 30 mol% of silver(I) nitrate did not improve the yield compared to the use of 20 mol% of silver(I) nitrate (entry 11), but using 10 mol% of silver(I) nitrate reduced the yield to 60% (entry 12). Surprisingly, the reaction took place in the absence of a silver salt, albeit with lower yield (45%) (entry 13). A similar yield (49%) of 3aa was isolated when three equivalents of potassium persulfate were used in the absence of silver(I) nitrate (entry 14). The results suggest that silver(I) nitrate may play two roles, both as a accelerator and an oxidant. The use of other solvents, dichloromethane–water, 1,2-dichloroethane, acetonitrile, tetrahydrofuran, and N,N-dimethylformamide, was also examined, but the yields of 3aa were lower than with dichloromethane (entries 15–19). Screening the effects of the reaction temperature revealed that a reaction temperature of 30 °C gave optimal results (entries 2, 20, and 21).

Table 1 Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa

Entry

[Ag] (mol%)

[O] (equiv)

Solvent

Yieldb (%)

 1

AgNO3 (20)

CH2Cl2

33

 2

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

81

 3

AgNO3 (20)

Na2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

73

 4

AgNO3 (20)

(NH2)2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

43

 5

AgNO3 (20)

BPO (2)

CH2Cl2

65

 6

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (3)

CH2Cl2

80

 7

AgOAc (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

53

 8

AgBF4 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

20

 9

AgOTf (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

52

10

Ag2CO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

47

11

AgNO3 (30)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

78

12

AgNO3 (10)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

60

13

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

45

14

K2S2O8 (3)

CH2Cl2

49

15c

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2/H2O

50

16

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

DCE

70

17

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

MeCN

19

18

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

THF

35

19

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

DMF

61

20d

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

67

21e

AgNO3 (20)

K2S2O8 (2)

CH2Cl2

62

a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2a (1.5 equiv), [Ag], oxidant, solvent (1 mL), 30 °C, under argon, 16 h.

b Isolated yield.

c CH2Cl2–H2O (1:1).

d At r.t.

e At 40 °C.

With the optimal conditions in hand, we set out to investigate the scope and limitations of this oxidative ring opening/alkynylation protocol with regard to cyclopropanols 1 and 1-(substituted ethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one 2 (Tables 2 and 3). As shown in Table [2, a] variety of 1-(arylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-ones 2bh and 1-(3,3-dimethylbut-1-ynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2i) were viable for the construction of the corresponding alkynes 3abai in moderate to good yields, however, 1-[(trimethylsilyl)ethynyl]-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2j; TMS-EBX) did not give 3aj. Using 1-(phenylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-ones 2bh, several substituents, such as Me, Br, CN, Ac, and Ph groups, on the phenyl ring attached to the acetylene were well tolerated giving products 3abah. For example, 1-(p-tolylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2b) gave 3ab in 70% yield. 1-(4-Cyanophenylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2f) and 1-(3-acetylphenylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2g) with a para-cyano or para-acetyl group were also converted into products 3af and 3ag in moderate yields. Importantly, bromo-substituted 1-(phenylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-ones 2ce utilized under the optimal conditions gave bromo-substituted products 3acae that could undergo subsequent modifications at the halogenated positions. In the case of 1-(biphenyl-2-ylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2h) containing an ortho phenyl group the desired product 3ah was obtained in 51% yield. We found that the optimal conditions were compatible with 1-(3,3-dimethylbut-1-ynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-ones (2i) giving product 3ai in moderate yield.

The optimal conditions were applicable to a wide range of cyclopropanols, namely 1-arylcyclopropanols 1bi and 1-alkylcyclopropanols 1jm (Table [3]). Initially, a variety of 1-arylcyclopropanols 1bf were investigated in the presence of 1-(phenylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2a), silver(I) nitrate, and potassium persulfate. We found that several substituents, such as OMe, Cl, F, and CF3, were tolerated on the phenyl ring. 1-Phenylcyclopropanol (1b) displayed high reactivity and furnished the desired product 3ba in 78% yield. A substrate containing a bulky ortho group, 2-methoxybenzyl-substituted cyclopropanol 1c, gave 3ca in moderate (60%) yield. Using 4-chlorophenyl-, 4-fluorophenyl-, and 4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl-substituted cyclopropanols 1df gave 3dafa in 72%, 75%, and 53% yields, respectively. The reaction was applicable to heterocycle-containing substrates 1g and 1h, and successfully delivered products 3ga and 3ha in good yields. We were pleased to find that 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-pentylcyclopropan-1-ol (1i) was a suitable substrate and it successfully gave product 3ia. The optimal conditions were compatible with 1-alkylcyclopropanols 1jl, even bulky 1-(1-adamantyl)cyclopropan-1-ol (1l), affording products 3jala in high yields. Gratifyingly, 1-styrylcyclopropan-1-ol (1m) was also a viable substrate for the construction of 3ma in 55% yield.

Table 2 Variation of the Ethynylbenziodoxolone 2 a

a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.3 mmol), 2 (1.5 equiv), AgNO3 (20 mol%), K2S2O8 (2 equiv), CH2Cl2 (1 mL), 30 °C under argon, 16 h.

Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Control experiments and possible mechanism

As shown in Scheme [2], the reaction of cyclopropanol 1a with 1-(phenylethynyl)-1,2-benziodoxol-3(1H)-one (2a) was completely suppressed when using a stoichiometric amount of radical inhibitor (3 equiv), including 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl (TEMPO) and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT). The results suggest that this reaction involves a free radical process.

Therefore, the proposed mechanism outlined in Scheme [2] for this ring opening of cyclopropanols 1 by silver(I) nitrate and potassium persulfate begins by the formation of the alkyl radical intermediate A. The addition of intermediate A to the C≡C bond in 2 produces the vinyl radical intermediate B, followed by C–I bond cleavage by single-electron transfer and this is followed by β-elimination to give the desired products 3 and radical C. Within this process, silver salts might play at least two roles: as the catalyst to initiate the formation of the radical intermediate A and as Lewis acid to stabilize the radical intermediates.

In summary, we have developed a new silver-promoted oxidative ring opening/alkynylation of cyclopropanols with ethynylbenziodoxolones for the synthesis of alkylated alkynes in the presence of potassium persulfate. In this method, both silver(I) nitrate and potassium persulfate have two roles as catalysts and oxidants, thus achieving ring opening and alkynylation with broad substrate scope and excellent selectivity.

Table 3 Variation of the Cyclopropanol 1 a

a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2a (1.5 equiv), AgNO3 (20 mol%), K2S2O8 (2 equiv), CH2Cl2 (1 mL), 30 °C, under argon, 16 h.

NMR spectroscopy was performed on a Bruker advanced spectrometer operating at 400 MHz (1H NMR) and 100 MHz (13C NMR) or 500 MHz (1H NMR) and 125 MHz (13C NMR). MS analysis was performed on GC-MS analysis (Shimazu GCMS-QP2010) and ESI-Q-TOF (Bruker MicroQTOF-II). All melting points are uncorrected.


#

Silver-Promoted Oxidative Ring Opening/Alkynylation of Cyclopropanols; Typical Procedure

To a Schlenk tube were added 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (0.45 mmol), AgNO3 (0.06 mmol), K2S2O8 (0.6 mmol), and CH2Cl2 (1 mL). The tube was charged with argon (1 atm) and stirred at 30 °C for 16 h until complete consumption of the starting material (TLC monitoring). When the reaction had finished, the mixture was washed with aq sat. NaHCO3­. The aqueous phase was re-extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic extracts were dried (Na2SO4), concentrated under vacuum, and the resulting residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, hexane–EtOAc) to afford the desired product.


#

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5-phenylpent-4-yn-1-one (3aa)[9]

White solid; yield: 64.2 mg (81%); mp 52.9–54.0 °C.

IR (KBr): 1677 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.96 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.39–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.26–7.25 (m, 3 H), 6.93 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.27–3.23 (m, 2 H), 2.84–2.81 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.4, 163.5, 131.5, 130.2, 129.6, 128.1, 127.6, 123.6, 113.7, 89.0, 80.9, 55.4, 37.4, 14.3.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 264 (M+, 37), 233 (18), 221 (18), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H17O2: 265.1223; found: 265.1230.


#

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5-(p-tolyl)pent-4-yn-1-one (3ab)

White solid; yield: 58.4 mg (70%); mp 72.5–74.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 1675 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.97 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.07 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.28–3.24 (m, 2 H), 2.82 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.32 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.6, 163.5, 137.6, 131.4, 130.2, 129.7, 128.9, 120.5, 113.7, 88.2, 81.0, 55.4, 37.5, 21.4, 14.4.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 278 (M+, 52), 235 (23), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H19O2: 279.1380; found: 279.1385.


#

5-(4-Bromophenyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)pent-4-yn-1-one (3ac)

White solid; yield: 74.9 mg (73%); mp 112.6–113.7 °C.

IR (KBr): 1683 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.97 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.27–3.24 (m, 2 H), 2.84–2.80 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.3, 163.6, 133.0, 131.4, 130.3, 129.6, 122.6, 121.7, 113.7, 90.4, 79.9, 55.4, 37.2, 14.4.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 344 (M+ + 2, 20), 342 (M+, 18), 313 (10), 311 (9), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H16BrO2: 343.0328; found: 343.0335.


#

5-(3-Bromophenyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)pent-4-yn-1-one (3ad)

White solid; yield: 70.8 mg (69%); mp 78.2–79.5 °C.

IR (KBr): 1678 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.97 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.51 (s, 1 H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.13 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.26 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.83 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.3, 163.6, 134.4, 130.8, 130.3, 130.1, 129.6 (2 C), 125.7, 122.0, 113.8, 90.6, 79.6, 55.5, 37.2, 14.4.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 344 (M+ + 2, 15), 342 (M+, 15), 313 (11), 311 (10), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H16BrO2: 343.0328; found: 343.0336.


#

5-(2-Bromophenyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)pent-4-yn-1-one (3ae)

White solid; yield: 64.6 mg (63%); mp 83.6–85.2 °C.

IR (KBr): 1671 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.98 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.21 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.11 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.31 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.92–2.88 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.3, 163.6, 133.3, 132.2, 130.3, 129.6, 128.8, 126.9, 125.7, 125.4, 113.7, 94.2, 79.7, 55.4, 37.2, 14.6.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 344 (M+ + 2, 4), 342 (M+, 4), 264 (20), 263 (100), 135 (95).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H16BrO2: 343.0328; found: 343.0333.


#

4-[5-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5-oxopent-1-ynyl]benzonitrile (3af)

White solid; yield: 54.6 mg (63%); mp 108.3–109.5 °C.

IR (KBr): 1669 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.98 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 6.96 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.88 (s, 3 H), 3.28 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.87 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.1, 163.7, 132.1, 131.9, 130.3, 129.5, 128.7, 118.6, 113.8, 111.0, 94.2, 79.7, 55.5, 37.0, 14.0.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 289 (M+, 30), 288 (23), 258 (29), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H16NO2: 290.1176; found: 290.1186.


#

5-(4-Acetylphenyl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)pent-4-yn-1-one (3ag)

Light yellow solid; yield: 63.4 mg (69%); mp 56.6–57.8 °C.

IR (KBr): 1685, 1600 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.99 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.88 (s, 3 H), 3.31–3.27 (m, 2 H), 2.87 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.59 (s, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.4, 196.3, 163.7, 135.8, 131.7, 130.3, 129.6, 128.7, 128.1, 113.8, 92.9, 80.5, 55.5, 37.2, 26.6, 14.5.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 306 (M+, 27), 291 (28), 263 (12), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C20H19O3: 307.1329; found: 307.1335.


#

5-(Biphenyl-2-yl)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)pent-4-yn-1-one (3ah)

Yellow liquid; yield: 52.0 mg (51%).

IR (KBr): 1684 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.91 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.38–7.29 (m, 5 H), 7.28–7.24 (m, 1 H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.88 (s, 3 H), 3.10–3.06 (m, 2 H), 2.73–2.69 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.5, 163.6, 143.7, 140.8, 132.9, 130.3, 129.7, 129.3 (2C), 127.9, 127.8, 127.2, 126.9, 122.0, 113.7, 92.1, 80.6, 55.5, 37.1, 14.5.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 340 (M+, 12), 339 (14), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C24H21O2: 341.1536; found: 341.1538.


#

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-6,6-dimethylhept-4-yn-1-one (3ai)

Colorless liquid; yield: 36.7 mg (50%).

IR (KBr): 1711 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.96 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.14–3.10 (m, 2 H), 2.58–2.55 (m, 2 H), 1.17 (s, 9 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.2, 163.5, 130.4, 130.2, 113.7, 89.5, 77.2, 55.5, 38.0, 31.3, 27.3, 14.0.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 244 (M+, 7), 229 (21), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C16H21O2: 245.1536; found: 245.1541.


#

1,5-Diphenylpent-4-yn-1-one (3ba)[8c]

White solid; yield: 54.8 mg (78%); mp 57.7–58.7 °C.

IR (KBr): 1685 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.99 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.39–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.25 (m, 3 H), 3.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.85 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 197.9, 136.5, 133.2, 131.5, 128.6, 128.1, 128.0, 127.7, 123.6, 88.8, 81.0, 37.8, 14.3.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 234 (M+, 49), 233 (64), 128 (32), 105 (100), 77 (73).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H15O: 235.1117; found: 235.1124.


#

1-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-6-phenylhex-5-yn-2-one (3ca)

Light yellow liquid; yield: 50.1 mg (60%).

IR (KBr): 1683 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.37–7.35 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.25 (m, 4 H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 6.94–6.87 (m, 2 H), 3.80 (s, 3 H), 3.71 (s, 2 H), 2.78–2.74 (m, 2 H), 2.67–2.63 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 206.8, 157.3, 131.5, 131.2, 128.6, 128.2, 127.7, 123.6, 123.2, 120.7, 110.5, 88.8, 80.8, 55.3, 44.7, 40.7, 14.0.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 278 (M+, 23), 157 (82), 115 (100), 91 (91).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H19O2: 279.1380; found: 279.1384.


#

1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-5-phenylpent-4-yn-1-one (3da)[9]

White solid; yield: 57.9 mg (72%); mp 49.8–52.4 °C.

IR (KBr): 1688 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.93 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.45 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.38–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.28–7.26 (m, 3 H), 3.29 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.85 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.8, 139.7, 134.9, 131.5, 129.5, 129.0, 128.2, 127.8, 123.5, 88.5, 81.2, 37.8, 14.3.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 270 (M+ + 2, 15), 268 (M+, 45), 233 (49), 111 (52).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H14ClO: 269.0728; found: 269.0736.


#

1-(4-Fluorophenyl)-5-phenylpent-4-yn-1-one (3ea)[9]

Colorless liquid; yield: 56.7 mg (75%).

IR (KBr): 1690 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.04–8.00 (m, 2 H), 7.37 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.27 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 3 H), 7.14 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.29 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.85 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.4, 166.3 (d, J C-F = 253.0 Hz), 133.0 (d, J C-F = 2.0 Hz), 131.5, 130.7 (d, J C-F = 9.0 Hz), 128.2, 127.7, 123.5, 115.7 (d, J C-F = 21.0 Hz), 88.6, 81.1, 37.7, 14.3.

19F NMR (375 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –104.9.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 252 (M+, 58), 251 (78), 209 (20), 128 (27), 123 (100), 95 (57).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H14FO: 253.1023; found: 253.1029.


#

6-Phenyl-1-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]hex-5-yn-2-one (3fa)

Light yellow solid; yield: 50.3 mg (53%); mp 50.6–52.4 °C.

IR (KBr): 1669 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.35–7.32 (m, 4 H), 7.28–7.25 (m, 3 H), 3.82 (s, 2 H), 2.82–2.78 (m, 2 H), 2.69–2.65 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 205.1, 137.7, 131.5, 129.8, 129.5 (q, J C-F = 32.3 Hz), 128.2, 127.8, 125.6 (q, J C-F = 3.8 Hz), 123.8 (q, J C-F = 251.0 Hz), 123.4, 88.1, 81.2, 49.6, 41.2, 14.0.

19F NMR (375 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –62.5.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 316 (M+, 7), 157 (73), 128 (25), 115 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H16F3O: 317.1148; found: 317.1143.


#

1-(1,3-Benzodioxol-5-yl)-5-phenylpent-4-yn-1-one (3ga)

White solid; yield: 58.4 mg (70%); mp 79.6–82.3 °C.

IR (KBr): 1674 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.60–7.58 (m, 1 H), 7.46 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.39–7.37 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.26 (m, 3 H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 6.03 (s, 2 H), 3.23 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.82 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.0, 151.8, 148.2, 131.5, 131.4, 128.1, 127.7, 124.3, 123.6, 107.9, 107.8, 101.8, 88.9, 81.0, 37.5, 14.4.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 278 (M+, 53), 277 (41), 235 (20), 149 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C18H15O3: 279.1016; found: 279.1022.


#

1-(Furan-2-yl)-5-phenylpent-4-yn-1-one (3ha)

Light yellow liquid; yield: 38.3 mg (57%).

IR (KBr): 1663 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.60 (s, 1 H), 7.38–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 4 H), 6.56–6.54 (m, 1 H), 3.17 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 2.83 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 187.2, 152.5, 146.5, 131.6, 128.2, 127.7, 123.6, 117.3, 112.3, 88.4, 81.2, 37.5, 14.2.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 224 (M+, 54), 223 (100), 181 (75), 167 (64), 128 (54), 95 (63).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H13O2: 225.0910; found: 225.0917.


#

1-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-3-(phenylethynyl)octan-1-one (3ia)

Colorless liquid; yield: 50.1 mg (50%).

IR (KBr): 1680 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.99 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.34–7.31 (m, 2 H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 3 H), 6.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 3.32–3.26 (m, 2 H), 3.11–3.04 (m, 1 H), 1.64–1.61 (m, 1 H), 1.56–1.52 (m, 1 H), 1.39–1.23 (m, 6 H), 0.92–0.86 (m, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.7, 163.5, 131.6, 130.5, 130.2, 128.1, 127.5, 123.8, 113.7, 92.7, 81.8, 55.5, 43.6, 34.9, 31.6, 28.2, 27.1, 22.6, 14.0.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 334 (M+, 4), 263 (83), 215 (23), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C23H27O2: 335.2006; found: 335.2011.


#

1,7-Diphenylhept-6-yn-3-one (3ja)

White solid; yield: 48.0 mg (61%); mp 63.4–64.8 °C.

IR (KBr): 1690 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.37–7.34 (m, 2 H), 7.28–7.25 (m, 5 H), 7.20–7.16 (m, 3 H), 2.92 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.78 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.72–2.63 (m, 4 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 207.8, 140.8, 131.5, 128.5, 128.3, 128.2, 127.7, 126.1, 123.5, 88.5, 81.0, 44.3, 41.7, 29.6, 13.9.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 262 (M+, 14), 171 (60), 157 (100), 105 (92), 91 (82).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H19O: 263.1430; found: 263.1438


#

1-Phenylundec-1-yn-5-one (3ka)

Light yellow liquid; yield: 52.3 mg (72%).

IR (KBr): 1710 cm–1.

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.38–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.26 (m, 3 H), 2.74–2.65 (m, 4 H), 2.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 1.61–1.57 (m, 2 H), 1.30–1.26 (m, 6 H), 0.89–0.86 (m, 3 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 209.0, 131.5, 128.1, 127.6, 123.6, 88.6, 80.8, 42.8, 41.4, 31.5, 28.8, 23.7, 22.4, 13.9.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 242 (M+, 14), 171 (16), 157 (100), 129 (27), 115 (35).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C17H23O: 243.1743; found: 243.1747.


#

1-(Adamantan-1-yl)-5-phenylpent-4-yn-1-one (3la)

Colorless liquid; yield: 67.5 mg (77%).

IR (KBr): 1700 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.38–7.36 (m, 2 H), 7.27–7.25 (m, 3 H), 2.80–2.77 (m, 2 H), 2.65–2.61 (m, 2 H), 2.07–2.02 (m, 3 H), 1.85–1.82 (m, 5 H), 1.81–1.68 (m, 7 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 213.4, 131.5, 128.1, 127.6, 123.7, 89.3, 80.7, 46.2, 38.1, 36.5, 35.5, 27.9, 14.0.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 292 (M+, 5), 157 (7), 135 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C21H25O: 293.1900; found: 293.1908.


#

(E)-1,7-Diphenylhept-1-en-6-yn-3-one (3ma)

Yellow solid; yield: 42.9 mg (55%); mp 46.7–47.9 °C.

IR (KBr): 1696 cm–1.

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.61 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.57–7.55 (m, 2 H), 7.41–7.37 (m, 5 H), 7.27–7.26 (m, 3 H), 6.78 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.04–3.01 (m, 2 H), 2.81–2.77 (m, 2 H).

13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 198.1, 143.1, 134.4, 131.6, 130.6, 129.0, 128.3, 128.2, 127.7, 125.9, 123.6, 88.8, 81.1, 39.7, 14.3.

LR-MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z (%) = 260 (M+, 4), 217 (81), 203 (42), 131 (56), 103 (100).

HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C19H17O: 261.1274; found: 261.1280.


#
#

Acknowledgment

We thank the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21472039 and 21172060) and Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 13JJ2018) for financial support.

Supporting Information

  • Reference


    • For selected reviews and papers:
    • 1a Patai S. The Chemistry of Triple-Bonded Functional Groups. Wiley; New York: 1994
    • 1b Stang PJ, Diederich F. Modern Acetylene Chemistry . VCH; Weinheim: 1995
    • 1c Diederich F, Stang PJ, Tykwinski RR. Acetylene Chemistry: Chemistry, Biology and Material Science . Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005
    • 2a Negishi E, Anastasia L. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 1979
    • 2b Tykwinski RR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 1566
    • 2c Plenio H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 6954
    • 2d Chinchilla R, Nájera C. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 874
    • 2e de Meijere A, Diederich F. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions . 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004
    • 2f Doucet H, Hierso J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 834
    • 3a Eckhardt M, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 13642
    • 3b Vechorkin O, Barmaz D, Proust V, Hu X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 12078
    • 3c Garcia PM. P, Ren P, Scopelliti R, Hu X. ACS Catal. 2015; 5: 1164
    • 3d Hatakeyama T, Okada Y, Yoshimoto Y, Nakamura M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 10973
    • 3e Vechorkin O, Godinat A, Scopelliti R, Hu X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 11777
    • 3f Cheung CW, Ren P, Hu X. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 2566
    • 3g Xu T, Hu X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 1307
    • 4a Ouyang X.-H, Song R.-J, Wang C.-Y, Yang Y, Li J.-H. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 14497
    • 4b Wang Z, Li L, Huang Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 12233
    • 4c Wang Z, Li X, Huang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 14219
    • 4d Wang H, Xie F, Qi Z, Li X. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 920
    • 5a Li Y, Liu X, Jiang H, Liu B, Chen Z, Zhou P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 6341
    • 5b Nicolai S, Piemontesi C, Waser J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 4680
    • 5c González DF, Brand JP, Waser J. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 9457
    • 5d Brand JP, Waser J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 4165
    • 5e Vaillant FL, Courant T, Waser J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 11200
    • 5f Yang J, Zhang J, Qi L, Hu C, Chen Y. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 5275
    • 5g Feng Y.-S, Xu Z.-Q, Mao L, Zhang F.-F, Xu H.-J. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1472
    • 5h Yang Y, Huang H, Zhang X, Zeng W, Liang Y. Synthesis 2013; 45: 3137
    • 5i Finkbeiner P, Weckenmann NM, Nachtsheim BJ. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 1326
    • 5j Huang H, Zhang G, Gong L, Zhang S, Chen Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 2280
    • 5k Wen Y, Wang A, Jiang H, Zhu S, Huang L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 5736
    • 5l Li Y, Liu X, Jiang H, Feng Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 3338
    • 6a Fujiwara Y, Domingo V, Seiple IB, Gianatassio R, Del Bel M, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 3292
    • 6b Seiple IB, Su S, Rodriguez RA, Gianatassio R, Fujiwara Y, Sobel AL, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 13194
    • 6c Lockner JW, Dixon DD, Risgaard R, Baran PS. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 5628
    • 6d Hu F, Shao X, Zhu D, Lu L, Shen Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 6105
    • 6e Liu X, Wang Z, Cheng X, Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 14330
    • 6f Wang H, Guo L.-N, Duan X.-H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013; 355: 2222
    • 6g Wang P.-F, Wang X.-Q, Dai J.-J, Feng Y.-S, Xu H.-J. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 4586
    • 6h Mai W.-P, Sun G.-C, Wang J.-T, Song G, Mao P, Yang L.-R, Yuan J.-W, Xiao Y.-M, Qu L.-B. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 8094
    • 7a Li Y, Wang J, Wei X, Yang S. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 35: 638
    • 7b Bloom S, Bume DD, Pitts CR, Lectka T. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 8060
    • 7c Li Y, Ye Z, Bellman TM, Chi T, Dai M. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2186
    • 7d Ye Z, Dai M. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2190
    • 7e Zhao H, Fan X, Yu J, Zhu C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 3490
    • 7f Jiao J, Nguyen LX, Patterson DR, Flowers II RA. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 1323
    • 7g Ilangovan A, Saravanakumar S, Malayappasamy S. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 4968
    • 7h Wang YF, Chiba S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 12570

    • During our prepare for this paper, a very similar report has come out. In this paper, excess amount of AcOH was required to promote the reaction with cyclopropanols. Furthermore, the scope is limited to silyl- and phenyl-substituted alkynes, see:
    • 7i Wang S, Guo LN, Wang H, Duan XH. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 4798
    • 8a Ishida K, Kusama H, Iwasawa N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 8842
    • 8b Cai Y, Jalan A, Kubosumi AR, Castle SL. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 488
    • 8c Imagawa H, Kurisaki T, Nishizawa M. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 3679
  • 9 Zheng HC, Felix RJ, Gagné MR. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 2272

  • Reference


    • For selected reviews and papers:
    • 1a Patai S. The Chemistry of Triple-Bonded Functional Groups. Wiley; New York: 1994
    • 1b Stang PJ, Diederich F. Modern Acetylene Chemistry . VCH; Weinheim: 1995
    • 1c Diederich F, Stang PJ, Tykwinski RR. Acetylene Chemistry: Chemistry, Biology and Material Science . Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005
    • 2a Negishi E, Anastasia L. Chem. Rev. 2003; 103: 1979
    • 2b Tykwinski RR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003; 42: 1566
    • 2c Plenio H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 6954
    • 2d Chinchilla R, Nájera C. Chem. Rev. 2007; 107: 874
    • 2e de Meijere A, Diederich F. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions . 2nd ed. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2004
    • 2f Doucet H, Hierso J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007; 46: 834
    • 3a Eckhardt M, Fu GC. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 13642
    • 3b Vechorkin O, Barmaz D, Proust V, Hu X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 12078
    • 3c Garcia PM. P, Ren P, Scopelliti R, Hu X. ACS Catal. 2015; 5: 1164
    • 3d Hatakeyama T, Okada Y, Yoshimoto Y, Nakamura M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 10973
    • 3e Vechorkin O, Godinat A, Scopelliti R, Hu X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 11777
    • 3f Cheung CW, Ren P, Hu X. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 2566
    • 3g Xu T, Hu X. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 1307
    • 4a Ouyang X.-H, Song R.-J, Wang C.-Y, Yang Y, Li J.-H. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 14497
    • 4b Wang Z, Li L, Huang Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 12233
    • 4c Wang Z, Li X, Huang Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 14219
    • 4d Wang H, Xie F, Qi Z, Li X. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 920
    • 5a Li Y, Liu X, Jiang H, Liu B, Chen Z, Zhou P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 6341
    • 5b Nicolai S, Piemontesi C, Waser J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 4680
    • 5c González DF, Brand JP, Waser J. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 9457
    • 5d Brand JP, Waser J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012; 41: 4165
    • 5e Vaillant FL, Courant T, Waser J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015; 54: 11200
    • 5f Yang J, Zhang J, Qi L, Hu C, Chen Y. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 5275
    • 5g Feng Y.-S, Xu Z.-Q, Mao L, Zhang F.-F, Xu H.-J. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 1472
    • 5h Yang Y, Huang H, Zhang X, Zeng W, Liang Y. Synthesis 2013; 45: 3137
    • 5i Finkbeiner P, Weckenmann NM, Nachtsheim BJ. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 1326
    • 5j Huang H, Zhang G, Gong L, Zhang S, Chen Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014; 136: 2280
    • 5k Wen Y, Wang A, Jiang H, Zhu S, Huang L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 5736
    • 5l Li Y, Liu X, Jiang H, Feng Z. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010; 49: 3338
    • 6a Fujiwara Y, Domingo V, Seiple IB, Gianatassio R, Del Bel M, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 3292
    • 6b Seiple IB, Su S, Rodriguez RA, Gianatassio R, Fujiwara Y, Sobel AL, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 13194
    • 6c Lockner JW, Dixon DD, Risgaard R, Baran PS. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 5628
    • 6d Hu F, Shao X, Zhu D, Lu L, Shen Q. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 6105
    • 6e Liu X, Wang Z, Cheng X, Li C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 14330
    • 6f Wang H, Guo L.-N, Duan X.-H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013; 355: 2222
    • 6g Wang P.-F, Wang X.-Q, Dai J.-J, Feng Y.-S, Xu H.-J. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 4586
    • 6h Mai W.-P, Sun G.-C, Wang J.-T, Song G, Mao P, Yang L.-R, Yuan J.-W, Xiao Y.-M, Qu L.-B. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 8094
    • 7a Li Y, Wang J, Wei X, Yang S. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2015; 35: 638
    • 7b Bloom S, Bume DD, Pitts CR, Lectka T. Chem. Eur. J. 2015; 21: 8060
    • 7c Li Y, Ye Z, Bellman TM, Chi T, Dai M. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2186
    • 7d Ye Z, Dai M. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 2190
    • 7e Zhao H, Fan X, Yu J, Zhu C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015; 137: 3490
    • 7f Jiao J, Nguyen LX, Patterson DR, Flowers II RA. Org. Lett. 2007; 9: 1323
    • 7g Ilangovan A, Saravanakumar S, Malayappasamy S. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 4968
    • 7h Wang YF, Chiba S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 12570

    • During our prepare for this paper, a very similar report has come out. In this paper, excess amount of AcOH was required to promote the reaction with cyclopropanols. Furthermore, the scope is limited to silyl- and phenyl-substituted alkynes, see:
    • 7i Wang S, Guo LN, Wang H, Duan XH. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 4798
    • 8a Ishida K, Kusama H, Iwasawa N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 8842
    • 8b Cai Y, Jalan A, Kubosumi AR, Castle SL. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 488
    • 8c Imagawa H, Kurisaki T, Nishizawa M. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 3679
  • 9 Zheng HC, Felix RJ, Gagné MR. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 2272

Zoom Image
Scheme 1 The ring opening and alkynylation reaction
Zoom Image
Scheme 2 Control experiments and possible mechanism