The Use of CT Scan in Hemodynamically Stable Children with Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Look before You Leap

Abstract

We set out to determine the diagnostic value of computed tomographic (CT) scans in relation to the radiation dose, tumor incidence, and tumor mortality by radiation for hemodynamically stable pediatric patients with blunt abdominal injury. We focused on the changes in management because of new information obtained by CT. CT scans for suspected pediatric abdominal injury performed in our accident and emergency department were retrieved from the radiology registry and analyzed for: injury and hemodynamic parameters, changes in therapy, and radiological interventions. The dose length product (DLP) was used to calculate the effective dose (ED) and with the BEIR VII report we calculated the estimated induced lifetime tumor and mortality risk. Seventy-two patients underwent abdominal CT scanning for suspicion of abdominal injury and eight patients were excluded for hemodynamic instability, leaving 64 hemodynamically stable patients. Four patients died (6%). On the remaining 60 patients, only one laparotomy was performed for suspicion of duodenal perforation. Only in three out of the 64 hemodynamically stable cases (5%), a CT scan brought forward an indication for intervention or change in management. One patient was suspected of a duodenal perforation and underwent a laparotomy. A grade II hepatic laceration, but no duodenal, injury was found. Two patients underwent embolization of the splenic artery. One for an arterial blush caused by splenic laceration as was observed on the contrast enhanced-CT. Patient remained stable and during the angiogram the blush had disappeared. The second patient underwent (prophylactic) selective arterial embolization for having sustained a grade V splenic injury. The median radiation dosage was 11.43 mSv (range 1.19–23.76 mSv) in our patients. The use of the BEIR VII methodology results in an estimated increase in the lifetime tumor incidence of 0.17% (range, 0.05–0.67%) and an estimated increase in lifetime tumor incidence of 0.08% (0.02–0.28%). The results of our data suggest that the use of CT scans can largely be avoided in hemodynamically stable children with blunt abdominal injury.

Keywords

abdominal injury - CT scan - radiation dose

• References

• 1 Gaines BA, Ford HR. Abdominal and pelvic trauma in children. Crit Care Med 2002; 30 (11, Suppl): S416-S423
• 2 McVay MR, Kokoska ER, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Throwing out the “grade” book: management of isolated spleen and liver injury based on hemodynamic status. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43 (6) 1072-1076
• 3 Retzlaff T, Hirsch W, Till H, Rolle U. Is sonography reliable for the diagnosis of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma?. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (5) 912-915
• 4 Nellensteijn DR, ten Duis HJ, Oldenziel J, Polak WG, Hulscher JB. Only moderate intra- and inter-observer agreement between radiologists and surgeons when grading blunt paediatric hepatic injury on CT scan. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19 (6) 392-394
• 5 National Research Council. BEIR VII: Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. Available at: http://www.philrutherford.com/Radiation_Risk/11340rb.pdf . Accessed June 29, 2005
• 6 Signaleringscommissie Kanker van KWF Kankerbestrijding. Signaleringsrapport ‘De kans op kanker. Bewerking van cijfers NKR en CBS 1999–2003’. Amsterdam, interne rapportage KWF Kankerbestrijding; 2007
• 7 Stylianos S ; The APSA Trauma Committee. Evidence-based guidelines for resource utilization in children with isolated spleen or liver injury. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35 (2) 164-167 , discussion 167–169
• 8 Ochsner MG. Factors of failure for nonoperative management of blunt liver and splenic injuries. World J Surg 2001; 25 (11) 1393-1396
• 9 Davies DA, Ein SH, Pearl R , et al. What is the significance of contrast “blush” in pediatric blunt splenic trauma?. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (5) 916-920
• 10 van der Vlies CH, Saltzherr TP, Wilde JC, van Delden OM, de Haan RJ, Goslings JC. The failure rate of nonoperative management in children with splenic or liver injury with contrast blush on computed tomography: a systematic review. J Pediatr Surg 2010; 45 (5) 1044-1049
• 11 Schenkman L. Radiology. Second thoughts about CT imaging. Science 2011; 331 (6020) 1002-1004
• 12 Shah DJ, Sachs RK, Wilson DJ. Radiation-induced cancer: a modern view. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 (1020) e1166-e1173
• 13 Albanese CT, Meza MP, Gardner MJ, Smith SD, Rowe MI, Lynch JM. Is computed tomography a useful adjunct to the clinical examination for the diagnosis of pediatric gastrointestinal perforation from blunt abdominal trauma in children?. J Trauma 1996; 40 (3) 417-421
• 14 Letton Jr RW, Worrell V, Tuggle DW ; American Pediatric Surgical Association Committee on Trauma Blunt Intestinal Injury Study Group. Delay in diagnosis and treatment of blunt intestinal perforation does not adversely affect prognosis in the pediatric trauma patient. J Trauma 2010; 68 (4) 790-795
• 15 Allen GS, Moore FA, Cox Jr CS, Mehall JR, Duke JH. Delayed diagnosis of blunt duodenal injury: an avoidable complication. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 187 (4) 393-399
• 16 Venkatesh KR, McQuay Jr N. Outcomes of management in stable children with intra-abdominal free fluid without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury. J Trauma 2007; 62 (1) 216-220
• 17 Karam O, Sanchez O, Chardot C, La Scala G. Blunt abdominal trauma in children: a score to predict the absence of organ injury. J Pediatr 2009; 154 (6) 912-917