Obstetric Ultrasound Quality Improvement Initiative—Utilization of a Quality Assurance Process and Standardized Checklists

Abstract

Objective Our aim was to assess whether mandated completion of an electronic checklist and a quality assurance (QA) process improved obstetric (OB) ultrasound image documentation.

Study Design A checklist of mandated images based on the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine guidelines was created. A baseline QA assessment was performed with a lead senior sonographer reviewing eight random OB examinations for each sonographer. An electronic checklist was then instituted for all OB examinations on each ultrasound machine. It was mandated that each anatomical structure be checked off during real-time image acquisition. A repeat QA assessment of each sonographer was then performed quarterly.

Results Baseline assessments were performed between September 2011 and November 2011. Out of the 110 examinations analyzed, only 49% were deemed “complete” with none of the sonographers having a 100% complete examination rate. Following institution of the mandated electronic checklist, a repeat assessment revealed an 81% complete examination rate for the next quarter, and 90% were complete at the end of a year. All sonographers improved their image acquisition regardless of baseline skill level at the initial QA.

Conclusion A QA process and a mandated standardized electronic checklist improved the image documentation.

Keywords

ultrasound - quality - checklists - obstetric - improvement

Note

The article was presented in poster format at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine; February 2014; New Orleans, LA.

• References

• 1 O'Keeffe DF, Abuhamad A. Obstetric ultrasound utilization in the United States: data from various health plans. Semin Perinatol 2013; 37 (5) 292-294
• 2 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32 (6) 1083-1101
• 3 Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V , et al; ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37 (1) 116-126
• 4 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Education Committee. Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29 (1) 109-116
• 5 Carvalho JS, Allan LD, Chaoui R , et al; International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 (3) 348-359
• 6 Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM , et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 (1) 102-113
• 7 Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM , et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 (2) 233-239
• 8 Chervenak FA, Chervenak JL. Medical legal issues in obstetric ultrasound. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34 (2) 299-308 , vi
• 9 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2 Pt 1) 451-461
• 10 D'Alton ME, Fuchs KM, Abuhammad A , et al; Nuchal Translucency Quality Review Program. Implementation of a national nuchal translucency education and quality monitoring program. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (1) 149-154
• 11 Abuhamad AZ, Benacerraf BR, Woletz P, Burke BL. The accreditation of ultrasound practices: impact on compliance with minimum performance guidelines. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23 (8) 1023-1029
• 12 The Fetal Medicine Foundation Available at: www.fetalmedicineusa.com/accreditation.php . Accessed December 17, 2014
• 13 Nuchal Translucency Quality Review Available at: www.NQTR.org . Accessed December 17, 2014