physioscience 2015; 11(02): 82-83
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1399651
gelesen und kommentiert
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Is One Better than Another? A Randomized Clinical Trial of Manual Therapy for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain

Ist eine (Technik) besser als eine andere? Eine randomisierte klinische Studie über Manuelle Therapie bei Patienten mit chronischen Nackenschmerzen
T. Szikszay
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 May 2015 (online)

Pérez HI, Perez JLA, Martinez GA et al. Man Ther 2014; 19: 215 – 221

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Bisset L, Beller E, Jull G et al. Mobilisation with movement and exercise, corticosteroid injection, or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 939
  • 2 Bruls VE, Bastiaenen CH, de Bie RA. Prognostic Factors of Complaints of Arm, Neck and/or Shoulder: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Pain 2015; 156: 765-788
  • 3 Casanova-Méndez A, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Rodriguez-Blanco C et al. Comparative short-term effects of two thoracic spinal manipulation techniques in subjects with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Manual Therapy 2014; 19: 331-337
  • 4 Creighton D, Gruca M, Marsh D et al. A comparison of two non-thrust mobilization techniques applied to the C7 segment in patients with restricted and painful cervical rotation. The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2014; 22: 206-212
  • 5 Gross A, Miller J, D’Sylva J et al. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane Review. Manual Therapy 2010; 15: 315-333
  • 6 Reid SA, Rivett DA, Katekar MG et al. Comparison of mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides and Maitland mobilizations for treatment of cervicogenic dizziness: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2014; 94: 466-476