Use of Small Gap Anastomosis for the Repair of Peripheral Nerve Injury by Cutting and Sleeve Jointing the Epineurium

Abstract

Background Although epineurium neurorrhaphy is the most reliable and conventional method for the repair of peripheral nerve injury and is accepted as the gold standard, it is still far from ideal. Many attempts have been made to develop nerve anastomosis techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of small gap anastomosis performed by cutting and sleeve jointing the epineurium for nerve repair.

Methods A 12-week study was performed using small gap anastomosis via cutting and sleeve jointing the epineurium, compared with epineurium neurorrhaphy in situ, to repair a rat sciatic nerve rupture. Three experimental groups were included: sham control (n = 8), small gap anastomosis (n = 16), and epineurium neurorrhaphy (n = 16). About 12 weeks after surgery, recovery was assessed with walking track analysis, electrophysiology, hematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy.

Results The sciatic nerve functional index observed in the small gap anastomosis group was significantly higher than that in the epineurium neurorrhaphy group (p < 0.05). In vivo electrophysiological analysis confirmed that the small gap anastomosis group showed a significantly higher conduction velocity than the epineurium neurorrhaphy group (p < 0.05). Postoperative morphometric analysis revealed better results after small gap anastomosis compared with epineurium neurorrhaphy.

Conclusion Small gap anastomosis via cutting and sleeve jointing the epineurium could be an alternative to epineurium neurorrhaphy for the repair of peripheral nerve injury, particularly, considering that the epineurium originates from native tissue that provides a suitable microenvironment for the selective regeneration of axons.

Keywords

nerve regeneration - sciatic nerve - small gap anastomosis

• References

• 1 Jiang B, Zhang P, Zhang D, Fu Z, Yin X, Zhang H. Study on small gap sleeve bridging peripheral nerve injury. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2006; 34 (1) 55-74
• 2 Belkas JS, Shoichet MS, Midha R. Peripheral nerve regeneration through guidance tubes. Neurol Res 2004; 26 (2) 151-160
• 3 Yavuzer R, Ayhan S, Latifoğlu O, Atabay K. Turnover epineural sheath tube in primary repair of peripheral nerves. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48 (4) 392-400
• 4 Jiang B, Zhang P, Jiang B. Advances in small gap sleeve bridging peripheral nerve injury. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2010; 38 (1) 1-4
• 5 Zhang P, Han N, Wang T , et al. Biodegradable conduit small gap tubulization for peripheral nerve mutilation: a substitute for traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy. Int J Med Sci 2013; 10 (2) 171-175
• 6 Siemionow M, Bozkurt M, Zor F. Regeneration and repair of peripheral nerves with different biomaterials: review. Microsurgery 2010; 30 (7) 574-588
• 7 Sun F, Zhou K, Mi WJ, Qiu JH. Combined use of decellularized allogeneic artery conduits with autologous transdifferentiated adipose-derived stem cells for facial nerve regeneration in rats. Biomaterials 2011; 32 (32) 8118-8128
• 8 Rui J, Dadsetan M, Runge MB , et al. Controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor using poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid microspheres: in vitro characterization and application in polycaprolactone fumarate nerve conduits. Acta Biomater 2012; 8 (2) 511-518
• 9 Roth J, Shtokman J, Shamir MH , et al. Regeneration of the transected rat sciatic nerve after suturing or adhesion with cyanoacrylate glue. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (1) 245-252
• 10 Happak W, Neumayer C, Holak G, Kuzbari R, Burggasser G, Gruber H. Morphometric and functional results after CO(2) laser welding of nerve coaptations. Lasers Surg Med 2000; 27 (1) 66-72
• 11 Karacaoğlu E, Yüksel F, Peker F, Güler MM. Nerve regeneration through an epineurial sheath: its functional aspect compared with nerve and vein grafts. Microsurgery 2001; 21 (5) 196-201
• 12 Chatdokmaiprai C, Suwansingh W, Worapongpaiboon S. The turnover distal epineurial sheath tube for repair of peripheral nerve gaps. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89 (5) 663-669
• 13 Bozkurt A, Dunda SE, Mon O'Dey D, Brook GA, Suschek CV, Pallua N. Epineurial sheath tube (EST) technique: an experimental peripheral nerve repair model. Neurol Res 2011; 33 (10) 1010-1015
• 14 Novak EM, Mestre GS, dos Santos PS, Sáenz CE, Gomes AR, Filho RT. Sliding of the distal epineural sheath to cover nerve defects [in Spanish]. Acta Ortop Mex 2009; 23 (2) 74-79
• 15 Ayhan S, Yavuzer R, Latifoğlu O, Atabay K. Use of the turnover epineurial sheath tube for repair of peripheral nerve gaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000; 16 (5) 371-378
• 16 Meek MF, Coert JH. Turnover epineural sheath tube in primary repair of peripheral nerves. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50 (3) 328-330 , author reply 330
• 17 Lubiatowski P, Unsal FM, Nair D, Ozer K, Siemionow M. The epineural sleeve technique for nerve graft reconstruction enhances nerve recovery. Microsurgery 2008; 28 (3) 160-167
• 18 Wang PJ, Zhou ZL, Dong QR. Small gap anastomosis to repair peripheral nerve rupture using a never regeneration chamber constructed by scissoring and sleeve jointing autologous epineurium. Neural Regen Res 2011; 6 (8) 623-628
• 19 Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA. Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83 (1) 129-138
• 20 Yu K, Zhang C, Wang Y , et al. The protective effects of small gap sleeve in bridging peripheral nerve mutilation. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 2009; 37 (6) 257-264
• 21 Oliveira JT, Almeida FM, Biancalana A , et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in a polycaprolactone conduit enhance median-nerve regeneration, prevent decrease of creatine phosphokinase levels in muscle, and improve functional recovery in mice. Neuroscience 2010; 170 (4) 1295-1303
• 22 Sabongi RG, De Rizzo LA, Fernandes M , et al. Nerve regeneration: is there an alternative to nervous graft?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1372477
• 23 Yang M, Rawson JL, Zhang EW, Arnold PB, Lineaweaver W, Zhang F. Comparisons of outcomes from repair of median nerve and ulnar nerve defect with nerve graft and tubulization: a meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011; 27 (8) 451-460
• 24 Konofaos P, Ver Halen JP. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: past, present, future. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (3) 149-164
• 25 Cruz NI, Debs N, Fiol RE. Evaluation of fibrin glue in rat sciatic nerve repairs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 78 (3) 369-373
• 26 Navarro X, Verdú E, Butí M. Comparison of regenerative and reinnervating capabilities of different functional types of nerve fibers. Exp Neurol 1994; 129 (2) 217-224
• 27 Demir A, Simsek T, Acar M , et al. Comparison between flexible collagen and vein conduits used for size-discrepant nerve repair: an experimental study in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (5) 329-334
• 28 Butí M, Verdú E, Labrador RO, Vilches JJ, Forés J, Navarro X. Influence of physical parameters of nerve chambers on peripheral nerve regeneration and reinnervation. Exp Neurol 1996; 137 (1) 26-33