A randomized trial comparing multiband mucosectomy and cap-assisted endoscopic resection for endoscopic piecemeal resection of early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus

Background and aim: Piecemeal endoscopic resection for esophageal high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) or early squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is usually performed by cap-assisted endoscopic resection. This requires submucosal lifting and multiple snares. Multiband mucosectomy (MBM) uses a modified variceal band ligator without submucosal lifting. In high-risk areas where ESCC is common and endoscopic expertise is limited, MBM may be a better technique. We aimed to compare MBM to the cap-assisted technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection of esophageal ESCCs.

Methods: Patients with mucosal HGIN/ESCC (2 – 6 cm, maximum two-thirds of esophageal circumference) were included. Lesions, delineated by 1.25 % Lugol staining, were randomized to MBM or cap-assisted piecemeal resection. Endpoints were procedure time and costs, complete endoscopic resection, adverse events, and absence of HGIN/ESCC at 3-month and 12-month follow-up. 

Results: Endoscopic resection was performed in 84 patients (59 men, mean age 60) using MBM (n = 42) or the endoscopic resection cap (n = 42). There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Endoscopic complete resection was achieved in all lesions. Procedure time was significantly shorter with MBM (11 vs. 22 minutes, P < 0.0001). One perforation, seen after using the endoscopic resection cap, was treated conservatively. Total costs of disposables were lower for MBM (€200 vs. €251, P = 0.04). At 3-month and 12-month follow-ups none of the patients had HGIN/ESCC at the resection site.

Conclusion: Piecemeal endoscopic resection of esophageal ESCC with MBM is faster and cheaper than with the endoscopic resection cap. Both techniques are highly effective and safe. MBM may have significant advantages over the endoscopic resection cap technique, especially in countries where ESCC is extremely common but limited endoscopic expertise and resources exist. (Netherlands trial register: NTR 3246.)

^* These authors contributed equally to this work

• References

• 1 Inoue H, Takeshita K, Hori H et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection with a cap-fitted panendoscope for esophagus, stomach, and colon mucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 58-62
• 2 Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74-108
• 3 Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010; 127: 2893-2917
• 4 Lu X-J, Chen Z-F, Guo C-L et al. Endoscopic survey of esophageal cancer in a high-risk area of China. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10: 2931-2935
• 5 Araki K, Ohno S, Egashira A et al. Pathologic features of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node and distal metastasis. Cancer 2002; 94: 570-575
• 6 Bollschweiler E, Baldus SE, Schröder W et al. High rate of lymph-node metastasis in submucosal esophageal squamous-cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 149-156
• 7 Wang G-Q, Abnet CC, Shen Q et al. Histological precursors of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a 13 year prospective follow-up study in a high risk population. Gut 2005; 54: 187-192
• 8 Soehendra N, Seewald S, Groth S et al. Use of modified multiband ligator facilitates circumferential EMR in Barrett’s esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 847-852
• 9 Alvarez HerreroL, Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FGI et al. Safety and efficacy of multiband mucosectomy in 1060 resections in Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 177-183
• 10 Peters FP, Kara MA, Curvers WL et al. Multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of Barrett’s esophagus: feasibility study with matched historical controls. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 311-315
• 11 Pouw RE, van Vilsteren FGI, Peters FP et al. Randomized trial on endoscopic resection-cap versus multiband mucosectomy for piecemeal endoscopic resection of early Barrett’s neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 35-43
• 12 Zhang YM, Boerwinkel DF, He S et al. Prospective feasibility study on the use of multiband mucosectomy for endoscopic resection of early squamous neoplasia in the esophagus. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 167-173
• 13 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-S43
• 14 Pouw RE, Seewald S, Gondrie JJ et al. Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for eradication of Barrett’s oesophagus with early neoplasia in a cohort of 169 patients. Gut 2010; 59: 1169-1177
• 15 Van Vilsteren FGI, Pouw RE, Herrero LA et al. Learning to perform endoscopic resection of esophageal neoplasia is associated with significant complications even within a structured training program. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 4-12
• 16 Repici A, Hassan C, Carlino A et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from a prospective Western series. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 715-721
• 17 Ishihara R, Iishi H, Takeuchi Y et al. Local recurrence of large squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus after endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 799-804
• 18 Esaki M, Matsumoto T, Hirakawa K et al. Risk factors for local recurrence of superficial esophageal cancer after treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 41-45