Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2016; 141(03): 263-269
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383412
Originalarbeit
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Chirurgische Therapie und prognostische Faktoren des Papillenkarzinoms

Surgical Therapy and Prognostic Factors for Carcinoma of Vaterʼs Papilla
T. O. Vilz
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
,
J. Funke
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
,
D. Pantelis
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
,
P. Lingohr
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
,
M. Wolff
2   Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Elisabeth-Krankenhaus Mayen, Deutschland
,
J. C. Kalff
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
,
N. Schäfer
1   Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Das Papillenkarzinom ist ein seltener Tumor des Gastrointestinaltrakts und unterscheidet sich bezüglich der Prognose von anderen periampullären Tumoren. Die Analyse des Überlebens sowie möglicher Prognosefaktoren ist aufgrund der geringen Inzidenz des Karzinoms schwierig. Ziel dieser Studie war die Analyse des Kurz- und Langzeitüberlebens sowie die Identifikation prognostischer Faktoren bei Patienten mit Papillenkarzinom und Duodenopankreatektomie und Rekonstruktion mittels Pankreatogastrostomie. Patienten und Methoden: Zwischen 1989 und 2008 wurden 76 Patienten mit einem Papillenkarzinom duodenopankreatektomiert, die Rekonstruktion erfolgte mittels Pankreatogastrostomie. Im Rahmen einer retrospektiven Analyse wurden verschiedene Faktoren (Demografie, perioperative Faktoren, Histopathologie) und ihr Einfluss auf das Kurz- und Langzeitüberleben untersucht. Die statistische Analyse erfolgte mittels Kaplan-Meier-Kurven, mögliche prognostische Parameter wurden einer uni- und multivariaten Analyse mit Cox-Regression unterzogen. Ergebnisse: Die 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate (JÜR) betrug 46 %, die 10-JÜR 26 %. In der univariaten Analyse war der einzig relevante Parameter bezüglich des Überlebens der Lymphknotenstatus (LK-Status). In der multivariaten Analyse konnten Geschlecht, Alter, Grading sowie insbesondere der N-Status als signifikante Parameter identifiziert werden. Schlussfolgerung: In dem aktuell untersuchten Patientenkollektiv hat der Lymphknotenstatus die höchste prognostische Vorhersagekraft bezüglich des Langzeitüberlebens bei Patienten mit Papillenkarzinomen.

Abstract

Background: Carcinoma of ampulla of Vater are rare tumours of the GI-tract with an improved prognosis compared to other periampullary tumours. Analysis of survival and prognostic factors are limited due to the low incidence of the carcinoma. The intention of this study in patients with papillary carcinoma was to evaluate short- and long-term survival and to identify prognostic factors for pancreatectomy and reconstruction using pancreatogastrostomy as treatment of carcinoma of Vaterʼs ampulla. Patients and Methods: Between 1989 and 2008 76 patients with a carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater were treated by oncological resection followed by pancreatogastrostomy. Various factors such as demographics, perioperative factors, histopathological findings as well as short- and long-term survival were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analysed statistically using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival with log-rank test and uni- and multivariate analysis with Cox regression. Results: The overall 5-year survival was 46 %, the 10-year survival 26 % for resected patients. By univariate analysis we could demonstrate that lymph node metastasis is the only predictor for outcome. In the multivariate analysis, age, sex, grading and especially lymph node status were a significant predictor for the survival of patients. Conclusion: In the current patient cohort lymph node status was the most important independent predictor of outcome after resection of carcinoma of Vaterʼs papilla.

Schlüsselwörter

Papillenkarzinom - Langzeitüberleben - Prognosefaktoren - Duodenopankreatektomie - Pankreatogastrostomie

Key words

carcinoma of Vaterʼs papilla - long-term survival - prognostic factors - duodenopancreatectomy - pancreatogastrostomy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Beger HG, Treitschke F, Gansauge F et al. Tumor of the ampulla of Vater: experience with local or radical resection in 171 consecutively treated patients. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 526-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Howe JR, Klimstra DS, Moccia RD et al. Factors predictive of survival in ampullary carcinoma. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 87-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Albores-Saavedra J, Schwartz AM, Batich K et al. Cancers of the ampulla of vater: demographics, morphology, and survival based on 5,625 cases from the SEER program. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100: 598-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Fischer HP, Zhou H. Pathogenesis of carcinoma of the papilla of Vater. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2004; 11: 301-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fischer HP, Zhou H. [Pathogenesis and histomorphology of ampullary carcinomas and their precursor lesions. Review and individual findings]. Pathologe 2003; 24: 196-203
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zhou H, Schaefer N, Wolff M et al. Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: comparative histologic/immunohistochemical classification and follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2004; 28: 875-882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Wittekind C, Tannapfel A. Adenoma of the papilla and ampulla–premalignant lesions?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2001; 386: 172-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sommerville CA, Limongelli P, Pai M et al. Survival analysis after pancreatic resection for ampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma: an analysis of clinicopathological factors. J Surg Oncol 2009; 100: 651-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Qiao QL, Zhao YG, Ye ML et al. Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: factors influencing long-term survival of 127 patients with resection. World J Surg 2007; 31: 137-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR et al. Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 929-936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Standop J, Overhaus M, Schaefer N et al. Pancreatogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy: a safe, feasible reconstruction method?. World J Surg 2005; 29: 505-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grutzmann R, Ruckert F, Hippe-Davies N et al. Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage in a high-volume center. Surgery 2012; 151: 612-620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 2011; 149: 680-688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005; 138: 8-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Barauskas G, Gulbinas A, Pranys D et al. Tumor-related factors and patientʼs age influence survival after resection for ampullary adenocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008; 15: 423-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Di GA, Alfieri S, Rotondi F et al. Pancreatoduodenectomy for tumors of Vaterʼs ampulla: report on 94 consecutive patients. World J Surg 2005; 29: 513-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kim RD, Kundhal PS, McGilvray ID et al. Predictors of failure after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2006; 202: 112-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al. Postoperative complications influence prognosis and recurrence patterns in periampullary cancer. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2234-2241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mizuno T, Ishizaki Y, Ogura K et al. Clinical significance of immunohistochemically detectable lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 221-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bottger TC, Boddin J, Heintz A et al. Clinicopathologic study for the assessment of resection for ampullary carcinoma. World J Surg 1997; 21: 379-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yeh CC, Jeng YM, Ho CM et al. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary cancer is not affected by age. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2945-2952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Payne RF, Pain JA. Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy is a safe anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 73-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Partelli S, Crippa S, Capelli P et al. Adequacy of lymph node retrieval for ampullary cancer and its association with improved staging and survival. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1397-1404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 655-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Figueras J, Sabater L, Planellas P et al. Randomized clinical trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy on the rate and severity of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1597-1605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Malleo G, Tonsi A, Marchegiani G et al. Postoperative morbidity is an additional prognostic factor after potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary duodenal adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 398: 287-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Okano K, Oshima M, Yachida S et al. Factors predicting survival and pathological subtype in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2014; 110: 156-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Zhou J, Zhang Q, Li P et al. Prognostic factors of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater after surgery. Tumour Biol 2014; 35: 1143-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sakata J, Shirai Y, Wakai T et al. Number of positive lymph nodes independently affects long-term survival after resection in patients with ampullary carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33: 346-351
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Zhou J, Zhang Q, Li P et al. Prognostic relevance of number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in resected carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Chin J Cancer Res 2013; 25: 735-742
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sakata J, Shirai Y, Wakai T et al. Assessment of the nodal status in ampullary carcinoma: the number of positive lymph nodes versus the lymph node ratio. World J Surg 2011; 35: 2118-2124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Roland CL, Katz MH, Gonzalez GM et al. A high positive lymph node ratio is associated with distant recurrence after surgical resection of ampullary carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 2056-2063
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar