Am J Perinatol 2015; 32(01): 101-106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1376312
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Impact of Antenatal Testing for Advanced Maternal Age on Cesarean Delivery Rate at an Urban Institution

Lisa D. Levine
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Sindhu K. Srinivas
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Emmanuel Paré
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
,
Shilpi S. Mehta-Lee
3   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, Maternal Fetal Care Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

13 January 2014

31 March 2014

Publication Date:
23 May 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objective Antenatal testing has been implemented for advanced maternal age (AMA) women given their increased stillbirth risk. Our objective was to evaluate cesarean delivery and induction rates after the start of antenatal testing at our institution.

Study Design A retrospective cohort study of AMA women (≥ 40 years) who delivered at our institution was performed. Testing for AMA began in 2005. AMA women who delivered before (unexposed) and after (exposed) the implementation were compared. Our primary outcome was cesarean delivery and secondary outcome was induction. Chi-square compared categorical variables and multivariable logistic regression calculated odds ratio (OR) and controlled for confounders.

Results A total of 276 women were included (147 unexposed and 129 exposed). The cesarean rate was higher in the exposed group (53 vs. 39%, OR 1.76 [1.09–2.84]). The increased risk of cesarean remained after adjusting for race, previous cesarean, multiple gestations, and parity (adjusted OR 1.85 [1.05–3.28]). When excluding those with previous cesareans, the risk of primary cesarean was not significant (OR 1.57 [0.89–2.76]). The induction rate was not different (38 vs. 33%, p = 0.4).

Conclusions While overall cesareans increased, there was no difference in primary cesarean and induction rates for AMA women after implementation of antenatal testing for AMA.