J Knee Surg 2014; 27(04): 267-272
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1373736
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Role for Irrigation and Debridement in Periprosthetic Infections

Carlo Romanò
1   Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e Delle Infezioni Osteo-Articolari, Istituto Ortopedico IRCCS Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
,
Nicola Logoluso
1   Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e Delle Infezioni Osteo-Articolari, Istituto Ortopedico IRCCS Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
,
Lorenzo Drago
2   Laboratorio di Analisi Cliniche e Microbiologiche, Istituto Ortopedico IRCCS Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
,
Andrea Peccati
1   Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e Delle Infezioni Osteo-Articolari, Istituto Ortopedico IRCCS Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
,
Delia Romanò
1   Centro di Chirurgia Ricostruttiva e Delle Infezioni Osteo-Articolari, Istituto Ortopedico IRCCS Galeazzi, Milano, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 December 2013

11 February 2014

Publication Date:
21 April 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Irrigation and debridement (I&D) has been described as a possible option to eradicate early postoperative periprosthetic hip and knee infections, as well as late, acute, and hematogenous ones. Still, the literature fails to uniquely assess the effectiveness of this procedure and often provides conflicting evidence. To reconcile this difference, a systematic review of the available literature from 1970 to 2013 was undertaken. Fifteen articles, for a total of 796 patients, met the inclusion criteria; the average success rate was 44.9 and 52% after a single or repeated I&D procedures, respectively, at an average of 4 years follow-up. Despite the methodological differences and the heterogeneity of the material reviewed, this study demonstrates that this procedure only attains a relatively low success rate of infection eradication, depending on when patients are selected for surgical intervention according to the timeframe of their symptoms.