Am J Perinatol 2014; 31(12): 1057-1062
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371710
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Implementation of a Universal Cervical Length Screening Program for the Prevention of Preterm Birth

Kelly M. Orzechowski
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Sara S. Nicholas
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Jason K. Baxter
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Stuart Weiner
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Vincenzo Berghella
1   Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 December 2013

07 January 2014

Publication Date:
04 April 2014 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Objective The objective of this article is to evaluate the implementation and acceptability of a universal cervical length (CL) screening program for prediction and prevention of preterm birth (PTB).

Study Design We performed a prospective observational study to evaluate the implementation and acceptability of a universal CL screening program. Between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012, women with singleton gestations, without a cerclage or prior spontaneous PTB, were offered transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) for CL between 180/7 and 236/7 weeks' gestation. Sonographers and medical staff received education before implementation. Intervention for a short CL was interpreted according to a standard protocol. On June 1, 2012, our program was modified from “opt-in” to “opt-out.” SPSS 20.0 (released 2011, IBM statistics for Windows version 20, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) was used for analysis.

Results Over 12 months, 1,484 (87%) of 1,706 eligible women were offered CL screening, and 1,119 (75%) were actually screened. Women were more likely to accept CL screening if they were nulliparous versus multiparous (83 vs. 68%, p < 0.001) and if the sonographer was female versus male (83 vs. 42%, p < 0.001). Implementation of an “opt-out” protocol did not increase the overall number of women accepting CL screening compared with an “opt-in” approach (76 vs. 75%, p = 0.81)

Conclusion Universal CL screening can be feasibly implemented and is acceptable to most women.

Note

This article was presented at the SMFM Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine 33rd Annual Meeting, February 2013, San Francisco, CA.