What is the Best Predictor of Mortality in a Very Low Birth Weight Infant Population with a High Mortality Rate in a Medical Setting with Limited Resources?

Abstract

Objective To determine the best predictor of mortality risk in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants in resource limited settings.

Methods The Clinical Risk Index for Babies (CRIB) II score and the simplified age-weight-sex (SAWS) score for all VLBW infants born during the period January 2005 to June 2006 at the University Hospital of the West Indies were retrospectively calculated. The respective ability of each score, birth weight, and calculated or assessed gestational age to predict mortality was quantified using the area under receiver operating curves.

Results Fifty two (48%) males and 57 (52%) females were entered into the study, out of which 58 (53%) infants died. The CRIB II score was found to be a better predictor of mortality (p = 0.02) when compared with calculated gestational age but had similar predictive power when compared with assessed gestational age. The SAWS score was found to have equal predictive value of mortality (p = 0.1) as the CRIB II score, however it was a better predictor of mortality than calculated gestational age (p = 0.002) but had no predictive advantage over assessed gestational age. Birth weight however, proved to be the best predictor of mortality (p < 0.01) with an area under the curve of 0.91 (standard error 0.03; 95% confidence interval 0.85–0.96).

Conclusion In resource poor settings where mortality of VLBW infants is high there may be no benefit in the addition of other variables to birth weight in predicting outcome.

Keywords

mortality risk - outcome - very low birth weight infants

• References

• 1 Wilcox AJ, Skjaerven R. Birth weight and perinatal mortality: the effect of gestational age. Am J Public Health 1992; 82 (3) 378-382
• 2 Chye JK, Lim CT. Very low birth weight infants—mortality and predictive risk factors. Singapore Med J 1999; 40 (9) 565-570
• 3 Richardson DK, Gray JE, McCormick MC, Workman K, Goldmann DA. Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology: a physiologic severity index for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 1993; 91 (3) 617-623
• 4 The International Neonatal Network. The CRIB (clinical risk index for babies) score: a tool for assessing initial neonatal risk and comparing performance of neonatal intensive care units. Lancet 1993; 342 (8865) 193-198
• 5 Parry G, Tucker J, Tarnow-Mordi W. UK Neonatal Staffing Study Collaborative Group. CRIB II: an update of the clinical risk index for babies score. Lancet 2003; 361 (9371) 1789-1791
• 6 Rosenberg RE, Ahmed S, Saha SK , et al. Simplified age-weight mortality risk classification for very low birth weight infants in low-resource settings. J Pediatr 2008; 153 (4) 519-524
• 7 The Planning Institute of Jamaica. Economic and Social Survey Jamaica. Jamaica, WI: PIOJ; 2000
• 8 DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44 (3) 837-845
• 9 De Felice C, Del Vecchio A, Latini G. Evaluating illness severity for very low birth weight infants: CRIB or CRIB-II?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 17 (4) 257-260
• 10 De Jesus LC, Pappas A, Shankaran S , et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Infants Born at <27 Weeks' Gestation. J Pediatr 2013;