Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 34(04): 516-521
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1351120
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Clinical Trial Design in Acute Lung Injury—Issues and Controversies

Maureen O. Meade
1   Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2   Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Francois Lamontagne
3   Department of Medicine, Universite de Sherbrooke, Faculte de medicine et des sciences de la santé, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
11. August 2013 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The evolution of scientific investigation in acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is replete with examples of effective bench-to-bedside transitions, pioneering research methodology, and international collaboration. This article highlights for clinicians a selection of challenges and controversies of clinical trial design in ALI and ARDS. A section on Patient Selection highlights controversial trade-offs between homogeneous and heterogeneous study populations. A section on Clinical Protocols covers blinding, process-of-care interventions, usual-care control groups, and standardized protocols for adjunctive care. The third section discusses the quest for ideal Study Outcomes. The final section presents Interpretation Controversies, such as early stopping of clinical trials.