Download PDF
manuelletherapie 2012; 16(05): 215-219
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331823
Schwerpunkt Lumbale Instabilität
Vertiefung
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Elf Fragen und Antworten rund um die motorische Kontrolle bei lumbaler Instabilität

Christine Hamilton
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 December 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

ALLES UNTER KONTROLLE? Seit Jahrzehnten ist das Thema lumbale Instabilität ein Dilemma der Manuellen Therapie. Endlose Debatten über Befund- und Behandlungsmaßnahmen erreichten teilweise mythische Dimensionen. Wie setzt man ein evidenzbasiertes Stabilisationstrainings in der Praxis um?

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bigos SJ. Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study II. Injury factors.. Spine 1986; 11 (3) 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Ferreira PH et al. Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2006; 52 (2) 79-88
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hides JA et al. Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain. Spine 1996; ( Phila Pa 1976; ) 21 (23) 2763-2769
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Hodges PW et al. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 1996; 21 (22) 2640-2650
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hodges PW et al. Intra-abdominal pressure increases stiffness of the lumbar spine. Biomech 2005; 38 (9) 1873-1880
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Lederman E. The myth of core stability. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2010; 14 (1) 84-98
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Lee JH et al. Tissue-engineered versus native cartilage: linkage between cellular mechano-transduction and biomechanical properties. Novartis Found Symp 2003; 249: 52-64 discussion 64–59, 170–174, 239–141
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Mandell P et al. Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures: Differences and similarities between low-back-injured and noninjured workers. Spine 1993; 18 (16) 2491-2501
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Mannion AF et al. Comparison of three active therapies for chronic low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001; 40 (7) 772-778
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Marshall P et al. Delayed abdominal muscle onsets and self-report measures of pain and disability in chronic low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009; o.S.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Moseley G et al. A randomized controlled trial of intensive neurophysiology education in chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 2004; 20 (5) 324-330
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Moseley GL et al. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine 2002; 27 (2) E29-36
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Moseley GL. I can't find it! Distorted body image and tactile dysfunction in patients with chronic back pain. Pain 2008; 140 (1) 239-243
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Nagata H et al. The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine 1993; ( Phila Pa 1976; ) 18 (16) 2471-2479
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Richardson C et al. Segmentale Stabilisation im LWS-Beckenbereich. Therapeutische Übungen zur Behandlung von Low Back Pain. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2009
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Tsao H et al. Driving plasticity in the motor cortex in recurrent low back pain. Eur J Pain 2010; o.S.
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Tsao H et al. How fast are feedforward postural adjustments of the abdominal muscles?. Behav Neurosci 2009; 123 (3) 687-693
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar