Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(08): 699-702
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329695
Commentary
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A Review of Studies with Chlorhexidine Applied Directly to the Umbilical Cord

Contributor(s):
Robert L. Goldenberg
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, School of Medicine, New York
,
Elizabeth M. McClure
2   Social, Statistical and Environmental Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Durham, North Carolina
,
Sarah Saleem
3   Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 August 2012

08 August 2012

Publication Date:
19 December 2012 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Infection-related neonatal mortality due to omphalitis in developing country home births is an important public health problem. Three cluster randomized trials of 4% chlorhexidine applied to the umbilical cord stump from once to multiple times in the days following a home birth have evaluated this intervention compared with other types of cord care on the development of omphalitis and neonatal mortality. Each of the three studies showed significant reductions in either omphalitis, neonatal mortality, or both with the 4% chlorhexidine. However, the optimal dosing schedule remains uncertain. Although further studies are needed to clarify this issue, from the three studies it is now clear that with a minimum of one application of 4% chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord stump following delivery, the incidence of omphalitis and neonatal mortality can be reduced, especially in preterm newborns. This intervention, which is safe and inexpensive and requires minimal training and skill, should strongly be considered for adoption wherever home births occur.

Keywords

chlorhexidine - neonatal mortality - cord care - developing countries
 

  • References

  • 1 Oestergaard MZ, Inoue M, Yoshida S , et al; United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation and the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group. Neonatal mortality levels for 193 countries in 2009 with trends since 1990: a systematic analysis of progress, projections, and priorities. PLoS Med 2011; 8: e1001080
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Black RE, Cousens S, Johnson HL , et al; Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of WHO and UNICEF. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2008: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2010; 375: 1969-1987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Tielsch JM. Role of antimicrobial applications to the umbilical cord in neonates to prevent bacterial colonization and infection: a review of the evidence. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003; 22: 996-1002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Agrawal PK, Agrawal S, Mullany LC , et al. Clean cord care practices and neonatal mortality: evidence from rural Uttar Pradesh, India. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012; 66: 755-758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Darmstadt GL, Hussein MH, Winch PJ, Haws RA, Gipson R, Santosham M. Practices of rural Egyptian birth attendants during the antenatal, intrapartum and early neonatal periods. J Health Popul Nutr 2008; 26: 36-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Blencowe H, Cousens S, Mullany LC , et al. Clean birth and postnatal care practices to reduce neonatal deaths from sepsis and tetanus: a systematic review and Delphi estimation of mortality effect. BMC Public Health 2011; 11 (Suppl. 03) S11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hundley VA, Avan BI, Braunholtz D, Graham WJ. Are birth kits a good idea? A systematic review of the evidence. Midwifery 2012; 28: 204-215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S, Rouse D, Vermund S. Use of vaginally administered chlorhexidine during labor to improve pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1139-1146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McClure EM, Goldenberg RL, Brandes N , et al; CHX Working Group. The use of chlorhexidine to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity in low-resource settings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 97: 89-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bakr AF, Karkour T. Effect of predelivery vaginal antisepsis on maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality in Egypt. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005; 14: 496-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Taha TE, Biggar RJ, Broadhead RL , et al. Effect of cleansing the birth canal with antiseptic solution on maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality in Malawi: clinical trial. BMJ 1997; 315: 216-219 ; discussion 220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Saleem S, Rouse DJ, McClure EM , et al. Chlorhexidine vaginal and infant wipes to reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 1225-1232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cutland CL, Madhi SA, Zell ER , et al; PoPS Trial Team. Chlorhexidine maternal-vaginal and neonate body wipes in sepsis and vertical transmission of pathogenic bacteria in South Africa: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 1909-1916
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mullany LC, Darmstadt GL, Khatry SK , et al. Topical applications of chlorhexidine to the umbilical cord for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in southern Nepal: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2006; 367: 910-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Soofi S, Cousens S, Imdad A, Bhutto N, Ali N, Bhutta ZA. Topical application of chlorhexidine to neonatal umbilical cords for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in a rural district of Pakistan: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1029-1036
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Arifeen SE, Mullany LC, Shah R , et al. The effect of cord cleansing with chlorhexidine on neonatal mortality in rural Bangladesh: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1022-1028
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar