Eur J Pediatr Surg 2012; 22(02): 136-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1308691
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Use of Mouth Brushings for Screening Girls Who Present with Inguinal Hernia for Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

Shakeel M. Rahman
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
,
Nigel J. Hall
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
2   Department of Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital and UCL Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
,
John A. Crolla
3   Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom
,
David O. Robinson
3   Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom
,
Michael P. Stanton
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
,
David M. Burge
1   Department of Paediatric Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

29 July 2011

08 November 2011

Publication Date:
19 April 2012 (online)

Abstract

Introduction Published guidance recommends that all girls with inguinal hernia should be screened for complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS). We report a novel, noninvasive screening technique.

Methods Retrospective review of all girls undergoing inguinal herniotomy from April 2009 to October 2010. Those screened using the novel technique of extraction of Y chromosome specific DNA from a buccal mucosal sample obtained by mouth brushing are reported.

Results A total of 29 girls were screened by mouth brushing at median age 2.9 years (range 29 days to 9.3 years). Of the 29 samples, 25 were adequate for DNA extraction; 4 were inadequate and screening was repeated (3 repeat mouth brushing, 1 perioperative blood test). Mouth brushing was well tolerated by children and acceptable to parents. A preoperative blood test was avoided in all girls who had a mouth brushing. None of the girls in this study had CAIS. Turn-around time for mouth brushing was mean 4.9 days compared with a minimum of 10 days for a karyotype. This technique is cheaper than a karyotype (£87 vs. £205).

Conclusion Extraction of Y chromosome specific DNA from a mouth brushing sample is effective for screening girls with inguinal hernia for CAIS. It is acceptable, cheaper, and quicker than alternatives.

 
  • References

  • 1 Grumbach MM, Hughes IA, Conte FA. Disorders of sex differentiation. In: Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, , et al, eds. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2003: 842-1002
  • 2 Viner RM, Teoh Y, Williams DM, Patterson MN, Hughes IA. Androgen insensitivity syndrome: a survey of diagnostic procedures and management in the UK. Arch Dis Child 1997; 77 (4) 305-309
  • 3 Oakes MB, Eyvazzadeh AD, Quint E, Smith YR. Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome—a review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2008; 21 (6) 305-310
  • 4 Burge DM, Sugarman IS. Exclusion of androgen insensitivity syndrome in girls with inguinal hernias: current surgical practice. Pediatr Surg Int 2002; 18 (8) 701-703
  • 5 Deeb A, Hughes IA. Inguinal hernia in female infants: a cue to check the sex chromosomes?. BJU Int 2005; 96 (3) 401-403
  • 6 Sarpel U, Palmer SK, Dolgin SE. The incidence of complete androgen insensitivity in girls with inguinal hernias and assessment of screening by vaginal length measurement. J Pediatr Surg 2005; 40 (1) 133-136 , discussion 136–137
  • 7 Hurme T, Lahdes-Vasama T, Makela E, Iber T, Toppari J. Clinical findings in prepubertal girls with inguinal hernia with special reference to the diagnosis of androgen insensitivity syndrome. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009; 43 (1) 42-46
  • 8 Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 1988; 16 (3) 1215
  • 9 King IB, Satia-Abouta J, Thornquist MD , et al. Buccal cell DNA yield, quality, and collection costs: comparison of methods for large-scale studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002; 11 (10 Pt 1) 1130-1133