Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60(04): 285-289
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304541
Original Thoracic
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Early and Midterm Results of Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Sympathectomy

Burhan Apiliogullari
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Meram, Konya, Turkey
,
Hidir Esme
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Meram, Konya, Turkey
,
Banu Yoldas
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Meram, Konya, Turkey
,
Melike Duran
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Meram, Konya, Turkey
,
Nuri Duzgun
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Meram, Konya, Turkey
,
Mustafa Calik
1   Department of Thoracic Surgery, Konya Education and Research Hospital, Meram, Konya, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

18 August 2011

09 November 2011

Publication Date:
25 April 2012 (online)

Abstract

Background Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy (VATS) is the gold standard for patients with hyperhidrosis of the upper limbs. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the midterm outcome and the degree of satisfaction of patients who underwent single-port VATS.

Methods Forty three patients diagnosed with hyperhidrosis underwent T3, T4 VATS single-port approach, between January 2009 and May 2011. Early and midterm outcome with particular emphasis on patient satisfaction were collected by hospital chart and telephonic interview.

Results The mean follow-up was 14 months. No major perioperative complication occurred except for chylothorax in a case. During the immediate postoperative period, all the patients reported palmar anhydrosis. Compensatory sweating (6.9%) and recurrence of hyperhidrosis (6.9%) are responsible mainly for dissatisfaction. No patients experienced moderate or severe chronic pain.

Conclusions Single-port VATS is a feasible and minimally invasive technique with a low incidence of chronic pain for the treatment of hyperhidrosis. A few patients may experience compensatory sweating and recurrence of hyperhidrosis. The degree of patient satisfaction with the midterm surgical results is high.

 
  • References

  • 1 Strutton DR, Kowalski JW, Glaser DA, Stang PE. US prevalence of hyperhidrosis and impact on individuals with axillary hyperhidrosis: results from a national survey. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51 (2) 241-248
  • 2 Hutter J, Reich-Weinberger S, Hitzl W, Stein HJ. Sequels 10 years after thoracoscopic procedures for benign disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32 (3) 409-411
  • 3 Rogers ML, Duffy JP. Surgical aspects of chronic post-thoracotomy pain. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000; 18 (6) 711-716
  • 4 Chen YB, Ye W, Yang WT , et al. Uniportal versus biportal video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Chin Med J (Engl) 2009; 122 (13) 1525-1528
  • 5 Lardinois D, Ris HB. Minimally invasive video-endoscopic sympathectomy by use of a transaxillary single port approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 21 (1) 67-70
  • 6 Murphy MO, Ghosh J, Khwaja N , et al. Upper dorsal endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy: a comparison of one- and two-port ablation techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30 (2) 223-227
  • 7 Bouma W, Klinkenberg TJ, Mariani MA. Bilateral single-port thoracoscopic sympathectomy with the VasoView device in the treatment of palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 12 (2) 106-109
  • 8 Georghiou GP, Berman M, Bobovnikov V, Vidne BA, Saute M. Minimally invasive thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis via a transaxillary single-port approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2004; 3 (3) 437-441
  • 9 Cohen Z, Shinhar D, Mordechai J, Mares AJ. Thoracoscopic upper thoracic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis. Harefuah 1996; 131 (9) 303-305 , 374
  • 10 Kuzucuoglu M, Karamustafaoglu YA, Tarladacalisir T, Mammedov R, Yoruk Y. Video-thoracoscopic sympathectomy by use of a transaxillary single-port approach. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011; 19 (2) 218-220
  • 11 Arezzo A, Morino M. Endoscopic surgery through single-port incision: time for a trial?. Surg Endosc 2011; 25 (6) 1709-1711
  • 12 Tassi GF, Davies RJ, Noppen M. Advanced techniques in medical thoracoscopy. Eur Respir J 2006; 28 (5) 1051-1059
  • 13 Hashmonai M, Assalia A, Kopelman D. Thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis. Ablate or resect?. Surg Endosc 2001; 15 (5) 435-441
  • 14 Rodríguez PM, Freixinet JL, Hussein M , et al. Side effects, complications and outcome of thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis in 406 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34 (3) 514-519
  • 15 Moreno Balsalobre R, Moreno Mata N, Ramos Izquierdo R , et al; SEPAR . Guidelines on surgery of the thoracic sympathetic nervous system. Arch Bronconeumol 2011; 47 (2) 94-102
  • 16 Cheng WC, Chang CN, Lin TK. Chylothorax after endoscopic sympathectomy: case report. Neurosurgery 1994; 35 (2) 330-332, discussion 332
  • 17 Herbst F, Plas EG, Függer R, Fritsch A. Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy for primary hyperhidrosis of the upper limbs. A critical analysis and long-term results of 480 operations. Ann Surg 1994; 220 (1) 86-90
  • 18 Ueyama T, Ueyama K, Ueyama K, Matsumoto Y. Thoracoscopic sympathetic surgery for hand sweating. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 10 (1) 4-8
  • 19 de Campos JR, Wolosker N, Takeda FR , et al. The body mass index and level of resection: predictive factors for compensatory sweating after sympathectomy. Clin Auton Res 2005; 15 (2) 116-120
  • 20 Singh B, Moodley J, Ramdial PK, Ramsaroop L, Satyapal KS. Pitfalls in thoracoscopic sympathectomy: mechanisms for failure. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2001; 11 (6) 364-367
  • 21 McCormack AC, Jarral OA, Shipolini AR , et al. Does the nerve of Kuntz exist?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011; 13: 175-178