Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754353
German Heart Surgery Report 2021: The Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Abstract
Based on a longtime voluntary registry, founded by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS) in 1980, well-defined data of all cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery procedures performed in 78 German heart surgery departments during the year 2021 are analyzed. Under more than extraordinary conditions of the further ongoing worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a total of 161,261 procedures were submitted to the registry. In total, 92,838 of these operations are summarized as heart surgery procedures in a classical sense. The unadjusted in-hospital survival rate for the 27,947 isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures (relationship on-/off-pump 3.2:1) was 97.3%. For the 36,714 isolated heart valve procedures (19,242 transcatheter interventions included) it was 96.7 and 99.0% for the registered pacemaker and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) procedures (19,490), respectively. Concerning short- and long-term circulatory support, a total of 3,404 ECLS/ECMO implantations and 750 assist device implantations (L-/ R-/ BVAD, TAH), respectively were registered. In 2021 329 isolated heart transplantations, 254 isolated lung transplantations, and one combined heart–lung transplantations were performed.
This annually updated registry of the GSTCVS represents voluntary public reporting by accumulating actual information for nearly all heart surgical procedures in Germany, constitutes advancements in heart medicine and represents a basis for quality management for all participating institutions. In addition, the registry demonstrates that the provision of cardiac surgery in Germany is up to date, appropriate, and nationwide patient treatment is guaranteed all the time.
#
Keywords
heart valve surgery - congenital heart disease - coronary artery bypass grafting - aortic surgery - heart-lung-transplantation - COVID 19Introduction
Legitimate demands for a sophisticated quality management in medicine – by authorities, scientific organizations, health care companies and patients all over the world – have stimulated a quality awareness. This resulted in the development of versatile quality assurance activities such as benchmark projects, public reporting, registries, and others to answer those needs. More than 30 years ago the board of directors of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS, www.dgthg.de) decided to set up a periodic data collection of all cardiac surgical procedures in terms of a voluntary, unaudited registry.[1] [2] Since 1989, the data are updated annually, summarized in the sense of a scientific registry, and published in the society journal each year.[3] [4] [5] [6] [7] The prevalent aims are: to detect developments and upcoming trends in cardiac surgery in Germany; to compile various results for nearly all cardiac surgical procedures; to provide each participant with a benchmark of the institutional results in comparison to the nationwide achievements; and to facilitate an evaluation on an international level for the GSTCVS.
For monitoring actual conditions as well as developments in cardiac medicine, the registry covers all relevant techniques and also innovative technologies incl. minimally invasive cardiac surgery as well as all kinds of heart valve procedures, incl. transcatheter heart valve interventions (e.g. TAVI). Thereby, important findings for current patient safety and the future of patient care are collected for evaluation under different aspects.
Data presented in this report comprehend the survey of the year 2021 whereby more than special circumstances, caused by the further ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, must necessarily be taken into account when interpreting the results.
#
Material and Methods
Since 2004 a standardized questionnaire gathers specific information for well-defined procedures, exactly described by an annually updated German adaption of the International Classification of Procedures in Medicine called “operation code” (OPS: Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel).
All participating institutions were requested to complete the structured questionnaire by January 25, 2022, entering all performed procedures and associated in-hospital mortality. The recommended path for data export is an electronic transmission of an encrypted file to the society office in Berlin. After transaction, the data were decrypted, evaluated for completeness and compiled for further analysis, thus ensuring anonymity for each participating institution. This compilation algorithm enables a high compliance for submission of complete datasets.
Inclusion criteria for the registry data 2021 were all cardiac surgical procedures performed on patients from January 1 to December 31, 2021, unrelated to the date of patients' admission or discharge as compared to other registries. Like in the earlier years, the number of procedures was counted rather than individual patients. For example, if a patient initially required isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), later followed by a mitral valve reconstruction due to an undesirable event, one count in the category “coronary surgery” and a second one in the category “mitral valve reconstruction” are enumerated. Thus, the registry contains more procedures than the real number of patients operated on.
Death of patients was defined as in-hospital mortality. Per definition, the observed mortality is always attributed to the first cardiac procedure, e.g. the death of a patient requiring a replacement of ascending aorta due to complication after CABG would only be attributed to coronary procedure.
The main reason for this structural set-up of the registry – established over four decades – is to keep in accordance with the German data privacy act with its specific regulations for patients. Furthermore, it seemed to be relevant to get detailed information about all performed procedures and not only the number of treated patients. Finally the process of data acquisition had to be standardized and feasible for all participating departments in Germany, thus enabling the submission of a complete data set, regardless of the hardware and software used locally.
In 2021, a total of 78 institutions performed heart surgery. As in the years before, all departments answered the questionnaire and delivered a complete data set for the surgical details, including unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates. In addition, comparisons between the registry data and the external quality assurance in accordance with §§ 135a/136/137 SGB V, obligatory for licensed German hospitals (§ 108 SGB V), are possible. Due to unexpected technical problems very little data concerning some patients' origins were not available for the year 2021.
For descriptive statistical analyses categorized tables and a summary registry data file consolidate the transmitted information of all departments, providing the basis for this and further publications. Longitudinal data from earlier registry specifications are also included in the presentation. The period considered where developments are shown is restricted to the past 10 years.
Categorical data are displayed as absolute and/or relative frequencies. Due to lack of complete data for patients' risk adjustment, all mortality rates are unadjusted. Quantitative data are presented as absolute frequencies and arithmetic mean values. Where appropriate, the value range is presented additionally. Patient age, though originally a quantitative variable, is only available in age groups and therefore treated as a categorical variable. German population-based measures are calculated as frequencies per 100,000 inhabitants and are based on the latest published data of the Federal Office for Statistics (Destatis) dated September 30, 2021.
The questionnaires were compiled using Microsoft Visual Basic for Applications. Analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics v22 and Microsoft Excel 2010, charts and tables were created with Microsoft Excel 2010.
#
Registry Data 2021
[Table 1] shows the distribution of cardiac surgical procedures between the 16 German states, based on the population count of the Federal Office for Statistics as of September 30, 2021. Concerning patients' origin it has to be considered that a very small amount of missing data (0.9%) influences the distribution of heart procedures per federal state. Taking this into account, the range of heart operations per 100,000 inhabitants shows a minimum of 96.3 (Baden-Württemberg, population: 11,123,393) and a maximum of 156.1 (Sachsen-Anhalt, population: 2,172,221), while the nationwide mean-value at the end of 2021 was 109.9 ([Table 1]). In addition, [Table 1] shows a state-by-state representation of confirmed COVID-19 cases/100,000 population with a median of 5,483.9 (range: 9,594), a minimum of 3,174 in Schleswig-Holstein and a maximum of 12,768 in Sachsen. Thus, the mean of confirmed COVID-19 cases was threefold higher than last year's and a much broader range among the federal states (range 2020: 2,504) could be observed.
Federal state |
Population[a] |
Quantity[b] |
Heart procedures/100,000 inhabitants |
Total number of COVID-19 cases[c] |
COVID-19 cases/100,000 population[c] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baden-Württemberg |
11,123,393 |
10,716 |
96.3 |
774,223 |
6,960 |
Bayern |
13,176,644 |
13,051 |
99.0 |
998,071 |
7,575 |
Berlin |
3,669,811 |
3,704 |
100.9 |
230,966 |
6,294 |
Brandenburg |
2,537,202 |
3,152 |
124.2 |
200,301 |
7,895 |
Bremen |
675,171 |
685 |
101.5 |
33,606 |
4,977 |
Hamburg |
1,853,049 |
2,186 |
118.0 |
101,845 |
5,496 |
Hessen |
6,290,030 |
7,036 |
111.9 |
340,702 |
5,417 |
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern |
1,612,466 |
1,228 |
76.2 |
87,764 |
5,443 |
Niedersachsen |
8,025,848 |
9,479 |
118.1 |
333,592 |
4,156 |
Nordrhein-Westfalen |
17,918,037 |
19,939 |
111.3 |
979,527 |
5,467 |
Rheinland-Pfalz |
4,105,944 |
4,636 |
112.9 |
205,203 |
4,998 |
Saarland |
983,070 |
1,034 |
105.2 |
53,790 |
5,472 |
Sachsen |
4,046,699 |
4,860 |
120.1 |
516,664 |
12,768 |
Sachsen-Anhalt |
2,172,221 |
3,391 |
156.1 |
194,547 |
8,956 |
Schleswig-Holstein |
2,920,850 |
3,875 |
132.7 |
92,704 |
3,174 |
Thüringen |
2,112,007 |
2,509 |
118.8 |
245,940 |
11,645 |
Deutschland |
83,222,442 |
91,481 |
109.9 |
5,389,445 |
6,476 |
a Federal Office for Statistics of German Population; due date September 30st 2021.
b n = 529, foreign residences excluded.
c Robert Koch Institute: laboratory confirmed COVID-19 cases; due date December 30st, 2021.
Analyzing quantified categories of heart operations by department dimension, categorizes more than 66.7% of institutions into two clusters with 500 up to 1,499 procedures (2021: 52/78) and 21.8% into those with a minimum of 1,500 up to a maximum of 4,040 performed procedures, respectively ([Table 2]). Before the pandemic started in January 2020 the caseload of the heart surgery departments was considerably higher.
Procedures (quantity) |
<500 |
500–999 |
1,000–1,499 |
1,500–1,999 |
2,000–5,000 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Departments |
9 |
32 |
20 |
6 |
11 |
Average |
373 |
795 |
1,241 |
1,708 |
2,635 |
Range |
157–491 |
551–975 |
1,036–1,493 |
1,565–1,982 |
2,057–4040 |
a CIED and extracardiac surgery without ECC are excluded.
Summarizing the departments by various heart surgical procedures, it can be asserted that heart operations in patients suffering from congenital heart disease or CHD (<1 year, with extracorporeal circulation [ECC]) are conducted in 21, isolated heart transplantations in 19 and combined heart–lung transplantations in one institution ([Table 3]).
Category |
n |
---|---|
Coronary artery bypass grafting |
77 |
Heart valve surgery |
77 |
Pacemaker/ICD procedures |
75/74 |
Surgery for CHD (pat, <1 y with ECC) |
21[a] |
Heart transplantation |
19[b] |
Heart-lung transplantation |
1 |
a N = 2,061: thereof: 19–40 op. in three units, 50–85 op. in nine units, 109–207 op. in nine units.
b N = 329: thereof: 1–4 transpl. in five units, 5–9 transpl. in four units, 10–19 transpl. in five units, 33–63 transpl. in five units.
Overall, as shown in [Table 4], 161,261 procedures were reported to the registry for the year 2021, a difference of 0.3% compared to 2020 (161,817 procedures) but a remarkable decline to 2019 (175,705 procedures). In 2021 the total amount of 92,838 heart surgical procedures in the narrower sense remained almost unchanged to the previous year (92,809 procedures) while from 2020 to 2019 a COVID-19 influenced decrease of 7.6% (100.446 procedures) was seen. Regarding CABG procedures an ongoing decrease must be recorded while heart valve and thoracic aorta procedures increased. The remarkable increase of assist device procedures by 12.5% is caused by a rise of non-permanent systems, almost certainly an effect of the COVID-19 pandemic ([Table 4]).
Category |
With ECC |
Without ECC |
Total |
Diff, 2020 (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CABG isolated |
21,280[a] |
6,667[a] |
27,947 |
−5.1% |
CABG combined |
7,961[a] |
214[a] |
8,175 |
−4.3% |
Heart valve procedures |
17,665[a] |
19,049[a] |
36,714 |
+ 3.5% |
Surgery of thoracic aorta |
7,499[a] |
704[a] |
8,203 |
+ 4.7% |
Surgery for CHD |
4,645[a] |
890[a] |
5,535 |
−0.6% |
Cardiac surgery, other |
1,322[a] |
1,210[a] |
2,532 |
+ 0.1% |
Assist device procedures |
578[a] |
2,832[a] |
3,410 |
+12.5% |
Extracardiac surgery |
287[a] |
48,968 |
49,255 |
+0.2% |
Pacemaker and ICD procedures |
35[a] |
19,455 |
19,490 |
−3.7% |
Total |
61,272 |
99,989 |
161,261 |
−0.3% |
a Sum: n = 92,838 (heart surgery procedures).
The number of procedures using ECC in Germany from 2012 to 2021 are illustrated in [Table 5]. Since 2012, a gradual reduction can be observed with the strongest decline in 2020. Presumably this reflects on one hand achievements of established innovations with minimally invasive heart surgical procedures, and on the other hand a relevant effect of the COVID-19 pandemic since 2020. In addition, the comparison of 2020 and 2021 shows a further decrease of 2,448 cardiac procedures using ECC during the ongoing pandemic situation.
Concerning gender distribution, the registry shows an overall male/female ratio of almost 2:1 with the greatest difference (4:1) in the patient group with coronary procedures ([Table 6]). 10,560 (11.4%) operations were conducted as emergency procedures, and 6,783 (7.3%) were reoperations ([Table 7]). These proportions appear quite consistent over the past years.
Procedures with ECC |
2021 |
2020 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Emergency |
10,560 |
11.4% |
10,445 |
11.3% |
Redo |
6,783 |
7.3% |
7,330 |
7.9% |
As shown in [Table V1] 14,279 (38.9%) isolated heart valve procedures were performed as single, 2,792 as double (7.6%), and 323 (0.9%) as triple valve procedures. Further 2,834 (36.8%, n = 7,698) aortic valve and 3,369 (55.7%, n = 6,052) mitral valve operations were performed via a minimally invasive access ([Table V2]). The number of single heart valve procedures via transcatheter approach increased over the last 2 years concerning aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve. The unadjusted mortality of the surgical aortic valve procedures amounts to 2.9%, nearly consistent over the last 3 years. Concerning the transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI), transferred by all heart surgery departments in Germany, the unadjusted mortality rate was 1.9% in 2021, a decrease of 0.5 percentage points compared to the two previous years (2020/2019: 2.4%).
Notes: Transcatheter heart valve procedures: 16,903 aortic valve implantation; 230 mitral valve implantation; 1,542 mitral valve repair; six tricuspid valve implantation; 522 tricuspid valve repair; 39 double aortic and mitral valve procedure.
Note: Apical aortic conduits procedures (n = 1) are not included,
In 6,754 (87.7%) isolated aortic valve operations under ECC conditions, xenograft prostheses were implanted, a consistent distribution over the last 5 years ([Table V3], [Fig. 5]). Concerning the treatment of mitral valve disease, in 63.3% (3,828) of the isolated mitral valve operations a reconstruction with preservation of the native valve could be achieved ([Fig. 7]). In a total of 2,500 combined mitral valve repair procedures, 1,094 (43.8%) simultaneous CABG procedures, 765 tricuspid valve repairs (30.6%), 464 (18.6%) aortic valve procedures and 177 (7.1%) concomitant CABG and AVR were performed ([Table V4]).
Note: Transcatheter procedures and apical aortic conduits procedures (n = 1) are not included.
Mitral valve procedures |
Repair |
Implantation/replacement |
Total |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n |
† |
% |
N |
† |
% |
n |
† |
% |
|
Isolated |
3,828 |
48 |
1.3 |
2,224 |
187 |
8.4 |
6,052 |
235 |
3.9 |
+ CABG |
1,094 |
46 |
4.2 |
802 |
130 |
16.2 |
1,896 |
176 |
9.3 |
+ Tricuspid valve repair[a] |
765 |
22 |
2.9 |
492 |
63 |
12.8 |
1,257 |
85 |
6.8 |
+ Aortic valve |
464 |
27 |
5.8 |
786 |
120 |
15.3 |
1,250 |
147 |
11.8 |
+ CABG + Aortic valve replacement |
177 |
19 |
10.7 |
245 |
53 |
21.6 |
422 |
72 |
17.1 |
Total |
6,328 |
162 |
2.6 |
4,549 |
553 |
12.2 |
10,877 |
715 |
6.6 |
a 39 procedures (not specified mitral valve + tricuspid valve surgery) excluded. Mortality: 15% (6/39).
The subgroup of 3,115 multiple heart valve procedures amounted to 2,546 (81.7%) double heart valve operations as a combination of mitral + tricuspid (n = 1,296) or mitral + aortic (n = 1,250) valve procedures ([Table V5]). Regarding the 16,903 transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVIs), an increase to 15,992 (94.6%) procedures performed by transvascular access and a lasting decrease to 911 (5.4%) by transapical access could be observed. In TAVI procedures without ECC the unadjusted mortality for those by transvascular access improved to 1.6% (255/15.917), respectively 4.9% (44/901) for the transapical approach. On the other hand, TAVI under use of ECC shows a remarkably high unadjusted mortality rate of 26.7% (20/75), respectively 30.0% (3/10) ([Table V6]), probably related to complications during the initial procedure.
Combination |
N |
† |
% |
---|---|---|---|
Mitral + tricuspid |
1,296 |
91 |
7.0 |
Aortic + mitral |
1,250 |
147 |
11.8 |
Aortic + mitral + tricuspid |
320 |
51 |
15.9 |
Aortic + tricuspid |
133 |
19 |
14.3 |
Aortic + pulmonary[a] |
102 |
2 |
2.0 |
Tricuspid + pulmonary |
11 |
0 |
0.0 |
Aortic + mitral + pulmonary |
3 |
0 |
0.0 |
Total |
3,115 |
310 |
10.0 |
Notes: Transcatheter procedures are excluded.
a Including Ross procedures.
Without ECC |
With ECC |
Total |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n |
† |
N |
† |
n |
† |
% |
|
Aortic valve implantation |
16,818 |
299 |
85 |
23 |
16,903 |
322 |
1.9 |
Transvascular |
15,917 |
255 |
75 |
20 |
15,992 |
275 |
1.7 |
Transapical |
901 |
44 |
10 |
3 |
911 |
47 |
5.2 |
Mitral valve |
1,666 |
40 |
106 |
12 |
1,772 |
52 |
2.9 |
Repair |
1,448 |
27 |
94 |
4 |
1,542 |
31 |
2.0 |
Implantation |
218 |
13 |
12 |
8 |
230 |
21 |
9.1 |
Tricuspid valve repair |
527 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
528 |
6 |
1.1 |
Repair |
521 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
522 |
6 |
1.1 |
Implantation |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0.0 |
Aortic + mitral valve implantation |
38 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
39 |
3 |
7.7 |
Aortic valve implantation[a] + CABG |
24 |
1 |
13 |
2 |
37 |
3 |
8.1 |
Mitral valve implantation[b] + CABG |
4 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
16.7 |
Aortic + mitral valve + CABG |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
– |
Total |
19,077 |
350 |
208 |
37 |
19,285 |
387 |
2.0 |
Notes: Pulmonary valve implantation for CHD excluded; 5% of TAVI by transapical access and less than 1% of TAVI under ECC conditions.
a Femoral, subclavian or transaortic access.
b Transvascular and transapical access.
Concerning the transmitted 36,122 CABG procedures, 77.4% were performed as isolated operations (n = 27,947), 11.8% (n = 4,267) combined with surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR) and 5.2% (n = 1,896) with simultaneous mitral valve operations ([Table C1]). These numbers depict a minimal decline compared to the previous year. [Table C2] provides an overview of the isolated CABG operations focused on the number of bypass grafts and indicates the corresponding unadjusted mortality rates for on/off pump surgery. While the total number of isolated CABG procedures showed a small decrease, the subgroup of isolated CABG without ECC increased to 6,667 (2020: 6,440). In addition, the unadjusted mortality rate of this subgroup decreased to 1.6% (2020: 2.0%), independent of the number of bypasses. In this context it has to be taken into account that conversions from off- to on-pump CABG are not captured. [Tables Con1] and [2] show data concerning congenital heart surgery procedures. In this subcategory the total number (n = 5,589) shows a small decline, meanwhile the unadjusted overall mortality rate changed to 2.1% ([Table Con1]) compared to 2020 (n = 5,637; 2.6%;) and 2019 (n = 5,834; 2.7%), respectively. [Tables Mis 1] [2] [3] [4] [5] demonstrate further compiled registry data under different aspects and for various categories like the Ross procedure, heart and lung transplantations, aortic surgery and heart rhythm procedures. With a total of 18,576 specified pacemaker and ICD procedures, the number declined by almost 3.2% (2020: 19,187) ([Fig. 11]), while the unadjusted mortality rate increased for pacemaker procedures to 0.9% (2020: 0.7%) and for ICD procedures to 1.2% (2020: 0.9%) ([Table Mis4]). As expected, the highest mortality rates for both CIED procedures were detected in the revision categories.
Transplant |
With ECC |
Without ECC |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n |
† |
% |
n |
† |
% |
|
HTx |
329 |
26 |
7.9 |
|||
HLTx |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
|||
LTx |
93 |
8 |
8.6 |
161 |
9 |
5.6 |
Notes: All pediatric transplantations (demonstrated in [Table Con2]) are included in this table.
Note: Eurotransplant (ET) report 2021: 324 HTx, 2 HTx + kidneyTx, 1 HTx + liverTx, 2 HLTx, 264 DLTx, 16 SLTx, 0 LTx + kidneyTx and 1 LTx + liverTx.
Replacement[a] |
With ECC |
Without ECC |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N |
† |
% |
n |
† |
% |
|
Supracoronary replacement of ascending aorta |
1,173 |
85 |
7.2 |
|||
Supracoronary ascending + aortic valve replacement |
1,133 |
45 |
4.0 |
|||
Infracoronary replacement of ascending aorta |
||||||
Mechanical aortic valve conduits |
309 |
16 |
5.2 |
|||
Biological aortic conduits |
1,023 |
102 |
10.0 |
|||
David procedure |
502 |
7 |
1.4 |
|||
Yacoub procedure |
108 |
5 |
4.6 |
|||
Other |
292 |
21 |
7.2 |
|||
Aortic arch replacement[b] |
2,815 |
400 |
14.2 |
|||
Replacement of descending aorta |
65 |
3 |
4.6 |
6 |
1 |
16.7 |
Thoraco-abdominal aortic replacement |
75 |
12 |
16.0 |
20 |
1 |
5.0 |
Endostent descending aorta |
4 |
3 |
75.0 |
678 |
21 |
3.1 |
Total |
7,499 |
699 |
9.3 |
704 |
23 |
3.3 |
Notes: All procedures involving aortic surgery are included in this table. Isolated aortic surgery as well as all possible combined procedures (e.g. additional CABG) are summarized in this category.
a Procedures for abdominal aortic diseases excluded: 442 abdominal procedures and 34 endovascular abdominal stents.
b All possible combined procedures included; the only common denominator is aortic arch surgery.
Note: 223 procedures are unspecified with regard to endo-/epicardiac ablation.
Compared to the data of previous years, some significant changes can be seen on one hand, while several developments remained almost unchanged in 2021 on the other hand. The number of CABG procedures, isolated or combined, shows a further decrease of 4.9% in 2021, considerably less than the decline of the previous year (13.9%). The number of isolated heart valve procedures rose to the level of 2019 (increase of 3.5%) ([Fig. 1]). However, unadjusted mortality rates for CABG, AVR vary just slightly over the last decade ([Fig. 2]). The age distribution of patients continues to evolve toward a higher percentage of elderly patients (≥80 years) as well as a continuous increase of adults ≤69 years (49.5%) ([Fig. 3]). Presently, 29.8% of the cardiac procedures are performed in patients from 70 to 79 years of age, and 20.7% in octo-/nonagenarians. The relative amount of isolated off-pump CABG increases steadily, reaching 23.9% in 2021 (2020: 21.9%) ([Fig. 4]).








With regard to heart valve prostheses distribution, in 90.0% (n = 6,754) sAVR was performed using a xenograft ([Fig. 5]), whereas in 10.0% (n = 748) a mechanical prosthesis was implanted: a consistent proportion over the past 5 years. The unchanged development of transcatheter heart valve procedures in Germany led to a total of 19,285 transferred procedures in 2021 ([Table V6]). Focused on the distribution of aortic valve procedures for 2021, 16,903 (69.2%) TAVI and 7,523 (30.8%) sAVR were reported to the registry ([Fig. 6]). It must be emphasized that exclusively the German departments for cardiac surgery contribute to these data. Therefore, the registry cannot reach completeness of TAVI data due to the fact that procedures documented by cardiology departments are incompletely included. On the basis of and in addition to the recommendations of international scientific guidelines and expert consensus on the management of valvular heart disease, respectively,[8] [9] [10] the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) implemented a quality assurance directive[11] for “minimally invasive heart valve interventions (TAVI, transcatheter mitral clip reconstruction)” in 2015, which is still under evaluation. Further surveys for selected procedures, such as the legally compulsory quality assurance (§135a SGB V) or the voluntary nationwide German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY),[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] provide various important findings and thus also contribute to an exceptional patient benefit.




In 2021, the rate of isolated mitral valve reconstructions remains almost unchanged on a remarkable level of 63.3% (2020: 64.1%) ([Fig. 7]). Based on the fact that all isolated mitral valve procedure are included, regardless of the underlying mitral valve disease concerning morphology or urgency of operation, it can be assumed that the relative rate of mitral valve reconstruction would certainly be even higher if patients without a possibility or indication for reconstruction would have been excluded (e.g., mitral valve stenosis, calcifications, or endocarditis) like in other publications, e.g., Gammie et al.[26] Therefore, other published rates of mitral valve repair have to be interpreted with caution if compared to this registry.


In 2021 almost half (48.5%; n = 2,685) of cardiac operations for CHD were performed in neonates/infants <1 year, 34.6% in children between 1 and 17 years and 16.9% in patients at least 18 years of age ([Fig. 8]). These numbers show a quite steady level over the past decade.


Concerning ventricular assist device (L-/ R-/ BVAD, TAH) implantations (n = 750) a further significant decrease of 11.0% compared to 2020 (n = 843) ([Fig. 9]) could be observed, while the total number of heart transplantations decreased to 329, a decline of 3.2% compared to the previous year ([Fig. 10]). Nevertheless, the mechanical circulatory support therapy, in particular LVAD, is still of outstanding importance for patients with end-stage heart failure.






#
Discussion
Even under the exceptional conditions of the further ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the registry of the GSTCVS enables a comprehensive overview of all heart surgical procedures performed in German cardiac surgery departments in 2021. The accuracy of this registry remains high due to the implemented compilation algorithm using standardized operation coding as a relevant criterion for reimbursement purposes. This is supported by other authors who could demonstrate a high accuracy for major outcome parameters in unaudited registries.[27] As observed in recent years, heart surgery in Germany is performed on a high level with superior in-hospital patient survival compared to international surveys. In addition, the registry demonstrates that the provision of cardiac surgery in Germany could be always enabled (24/7/365) nationwide, even under COVID-19 conditions. These aspects are especially important in the context of various developments in the German health care policy and considering the background of demographic trends of the German population, leading to more patients at increased age combined with a higher proportion of related comorbidities and an accordingly complex perioperative risk profile.
Compared to 2020, the number of cardiac surgery procedures showed a smaller decrease for isolated/combined CABG and sAVR than in 2019 to 2020, an ongoing trend in the view of the German population characteristics and in the context of application of scientific guidelines.[10] [28] [29] Despite this, for the years 2020 und 2021 it must be taken into account that the care of patients with heart disease was affected by the consequences of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with shutdowns and restrictions, respectively. Due to limited intensive care resources in all German cardiac centers, provision of elective/urgent heart surgical procedures was affected substantially. Otherwise, the low level in heart transplantations needs more efforts for a positive development in the future, even when the COVID pandemic will have been overcome.
Further improvements of the registry are recommended to enable more specified assessments and particularly risk-adjusted data analyses. However, if significant fundamental changes related to the modality of data collection were to be implemented, a modified structure would have to ensure further longitudinal data analysis.
Completeness, validity, and further progress depend on continued efforts and a close collaboration of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and all German cardiac surgical departments. This will be of outstanding importance as a contribution for patient safety and to obtain evidence for the high quality of heart surgery in Germany.
#
Abbreviations
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Acknowledgement
The German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery would like to thank all heads of the German cardiac surgical departments and their employees for their continued cooperation and support to realize the annual update of this registry.
-
References
- 1 Rodewald G, Polonius MJ. Cardiac Surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1978 and 1979. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 28 (06) 373-377
- 2 Rodewald G, Kalmar P. Cardiac surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1984. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 33 (06) 397-399
- 3 Kalmar P, Irrgang E. Cardiac surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1988. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 37 (03) 193-195
- 4 Kalmar P, Irrgang E. Cardiac surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1989. A report by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 38 (03) 198-200
- 5 Gummert JF, Funkat A, Krian A. Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2004: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53 (06) 391-399
- 6 Funkat AK, Beckmann A, Lewandowski J. et al. Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2011: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60 (06) 371-382
- 7 Beckmann A, Meyer R, Lewandowski J, Markewitz A, Gummert J. German Heart Surgery Report 2020: the Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69 (04) 294-307
- 8 Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, Bavaria JE. et al. 2019 AATS/ACC/ASE/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: a proposal to optimize care for patients with valvular heart disease: a joint report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Cardiology, American Society of Echocardiography, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107 (06) 1884-1910
- 9 Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO. et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021; 143 (05) e72-e227
- 10 Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F. et al; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2022; 43 (07) 561-632
- 11 Richtlinie zu minimalinvasiven Herzklappeninterventionen. Richtlinie über Maßnahmen zur Qualitätssicherung bei der Durchführung von minimalinvasiven Herzklappeninterventionen gemäß § 136 Absatz 1 Satz 1 Nummer 2 für nach § 108 SGB V zugelassene Krankenhäuser MHI-RL. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA). April 2022. Available at: https://www.g-ba.de/richtlinien/84/
- 12 Beckmann A, Hamm C, Figulla HR. et al; GARY Executive Board. The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY): a nationwide registry for patients undergoing invasive therapy for severe aortic valve stenosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60 (05) 319-325
- 13 Ensminger S, Fujita B, Bauer T. et al; GARY Executive Board. Rapid deployment versus conventional bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71 (13) 1417-1428
- 14 Fujita B, Ensminger S, Bauer T. et al; GARY Executive Board. Trends in practice and outcomes from 2011 to 2015 for surgical aortic valve replacement: an update from the German Aortic Valve Registry on 42 776 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53 (03) 552-559
- 15 Husser O, Fujita B, Hengstenberg C. et al; GARY Executive Board. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the German Aortic Valve Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11 (06) 567-578
- 16 Werner N, Zahn R, Beckmann A. et al. Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis: one year results from The German Aortic Valve Registry. Circulation 2018; 138: 2611-2623
- 17 Bekeredjian R, Szabo G, Balaban Ü. et al. Patients at low surgical risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation: in-hospital data and 1-year results from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (17) 1323-1330
- 18 Fujita B, Schmidt T, Bleiziffer S. et al; GARY Executive Board. Impact of new pacemaker implantation following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement on 1-year outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 57 (01) 151-159
- 19 Blumenstein J, Möllmann H, Bleiziffer S. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). Clin Res Cardiol 2020; 109 (09) 1099-1106
- 20 Voigtländer L, Twerenbold R, Schäfer U. et al; GARY Executive Board. Prognostic Impact of Underweight (Body Mass Index <20 kg/m2) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement (from the German Aortic Valve Registry [GARY]). Am J Cardiol 2020; 129: 79-86
- 21 Abdel-Wahab M, Fujita B, Frerker C. et al; GARY Executive Board. Transcatheter versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13 (22) 2642-2654
- 22 Färber G, Bleiziffer S, Doenst T. et al; GARY Executive Board. Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation in chronic dialysis patients: a German Aortic Valve Registry analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 2021; 110 (03) 357-367
- 23 Mas-Peiro S, Faerber G, Bon D. et al; GARY-Executive Board. Impact of chronic kidney disease in 29 893 patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59 (03) 532-544
- 24 Beyersdorf F, Bauer T, Freemantle N. et al; GARY Executive Board. Five-year outcome in 18 010 patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60 (05) 1139-1146
- 25 Piayda K, Bauer T, Beckmann A. et al. Procedural results of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with aortic annuli diameter ≥26 mm: insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Am J Cardiol 2022; 164: 111-117
- 26 Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, O'Brien SM, Rankin JS, Griffith BPJ. J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90 (05) 1401-1408 , 1410.e1, discussion 1408–1410
- 27 Herbert MA, Prince SL, Williams JL, Magee MJ, Mack MJ. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (06) 1960-1964 , discussion 1964–1965
- 28 Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (02) 87-165
- 29 Bundesärztekammer (BÄK). Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV). Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Chronische KHK. Accessed January 06, 2022 at: https://www.leitlinien.de/nvl/khk
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 20 June 2022
Accepted: 20 June 2022
Article published online:
10 August 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Rodewald G, Polonius MJ. Cardiac Surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1978 and 1979. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1980; 28 (06) 373-377
- 2 Rodewald G, Kalmar P. Cardiac surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1984. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 33 (06) 397-399
- 3 Kalmar P, Irrgang E. Cardiac surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1988. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 37 (03) 193-195
- 4 Kalmar P, Irrgang E. Cardiac surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1989. A report by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990; 38 (03) 198-200
- 5 Gummert JF, Funkat A, Krian A. Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2004: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 53 (06) 391-399
- 6 Funkat AK, Beckmann A, Lewandowski J. et al. Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2011: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60 (06) 371-382
- 7 Beckmann A, Meyer R, Lewandowski J, Markewitz A, Gummert J. German Heart Surgery Report 2020: the Annual Updated Registry of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 69 (04) 294-307
- 8 Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, Bavaria JE. et al. 2019 AATS/ACC/ASE/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: a proposal to optimize care for patients with valvular heart disease: a joint report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Cardiology, American Society of Echocardiography, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107 (06) 1884-1910
- 9 Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO. et al. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2021; 143 (05) e72-e227
- 10 Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F. et al; ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2022; 43 (07) 561-632
- 11 Richtlinie zu minimalinvasiven Herzklappeninterventionen. Richtlinie über Maßnahmen zur Qualitätssicherung bei der Durchführung von minimalinvasiven Herzklappeninterventionen gemäß § 136 Absatz 1 Satz 1 Nummer 2 für nach § 108 SGB V zugelassene Krankenhäuser MHI-RL. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (G-BA). April 2022. Available at: https://www.g-ba.de/richtlinien/84/
- 12 Beckmann A, Hamm C, Figulla HR. et al; GARY Executive Board. The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY): a nationwide registry for patients undergoing invasive therapy for severe aortic valve stenosis. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 60 (05) 319-325
- 13 Ensminger S, Fujita B, Bauer T. et al; GARY Executive Board. Rapid deployment versus conventional bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 71 (13) 1417-1428
- 14 Fujita B, Ensminger S, Bauer T. et al; GARY Executive Board. Trends in practice and outcomes from 2011 to 2015 for surgical aortic valve replacement: an update from the German Aortic Valve Registry on 42 776 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 53 (03) 552-559
- 15 Husser O, Fujita B, Hengstenberg C. et al; GARY Executive Board. Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the German Aortic Valve Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11 (06) 567-578
- 16 Werner N, Zahn R, Beckmann A. et al. Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis: one year results from The German Aortic Valve Registry. Circulation 2018; 138: 2611-2623
- 17 Bekeredjian R, Szabo G, Balaban Ü. et al. Patients at low surgical risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation: in-hospital data and 1-year results from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (17) 1323-1330
- 18 Fujita B, Schmidt T, Bleiziffer S. et al; GARY Executive Board. Impact of new pacemaker implantation following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement on 1-year outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020; 57 (01) 151-159
- 19 Blumenstein J, Möllmann H, Bleiziffer S. et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). Clin Res Cardiol 2020; 109 (09) 1099-1106
- 20 Voigtländer L, Twerenbold R, Schäfer U. et al; GARY Executive Board. Prognostic Impact of Underweight (Body Mass Index <20 kg/m2) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation or surgical aortic valve replacement (from the German Aortic Valve Registry [GARY]). Am J Cardiol 2020; 129: 79-86
- 21 Abdel-Wahab M, Fujita B, Frerker C. et al; GARY Executive Board. Transcatheter versus rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13 (22) 2642-2654
- 22 Färber G, Bleiziffer S, Doenst T. et al; GARY Executive Board. Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation in chronic dialysis patients: a German Aortic Valve Registry analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 2021; 110 (03) 357-367
- 23 Mas-Peiro S, Faerber G, Bon D. et al; GARY-Executive Board. Impact of chronic kidney disease in 29 893 patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59 (03) 532-544
- 24 Beyersdorf F, Bauer T, Freemantle N. et al; GARY Executive Board. Five-year outcome in 18 010 patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 60 (05) 1139-1146
- 25 Piayda K, Bauer T, Beckmann A. et al. Procedural results of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with aortic annuli diameter ≥26 mm: insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Am J Cardiol 2022; 164: 111-117
- 26 Gammie JS, Zhao Y, Peterson ED, O'Brien SM, Rankin JS, Griffith BPJ. J. Maxwell Chamberlain Memorial Paper for adult cardiac surgery. Less-invasive mitral valve operations: trends and outcomes from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2010; 90 (05) 1401-1408 , 1410.e1, discussion 1408–1410
- 27 Herbert MA, Prince SL, Williams JL, Magee MJ, Mack MJ. Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate?. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77 (06) 1960-1964 , discussion 1964–1965
- 28 Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A. et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (02) 87-165
- 29 Bundesärztekammer (BÄK). Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV). Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Chronische KHK. Accessed January 06, 2022 at: https://www.leitlinien.de/nvl/khk





















