ABSTRACT
We sought to reduce long-term complications after cesarean delivery by improving myometrial healing. Eight sheep (three with twins) underwent cesarean delivery. Hysterotomy sites were repaired in equal parts by suture alone or suture with a juxtaposed graft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN). At 90 days postsurgery, scar characteristics and tensile strength testing were assessed. The mean hysterotomy closure time was on average 1 minute, 14 seconds longer for those undergoing graft placement (p = 0.36). The mean scar thickness was 3.0 ± 0.4 mm for controls versus 3.8 ± 1.2 mm for the intervention group (p = 0.047). Tensile strength testing did not demonstrate a significant difference between groups. Histological examination of the myometrial scar showed no significant differences in inflammatory reaction or endometrial inclusions; however, neoangiogenesis was significantly enhanced. Myometrial repair incorporating a graft increased scar thickness and neoangiogenesis. This methodology did not incite adenomyosis or enhance inflammation within the scar.
KEYWORDS
Cesarean delivery - graft - hysterotomy - ovine model - small intestinal submucosa
REFERENCES
-
1
Monteagudo A, Carreno C, Timor-Tritsch I E.
Saline infusion sonohysterography in nonpregnant women with previous cesarean delivery: the “niche” in the scar.
J Ultrasound Med.
2001;
20
1105-1115
-
2
Armstrong V, Hansen W F, VanVoorhis B J, Syrop C H.
Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound.
2003;
101
61-65
-
3
Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E et al..
Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2008;
31
72-77
-
4
Regnard C, Nosbusch M, Fellemans C et al..
Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2004;
23
289-292
-
5
Osser O V, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L.
High prevalence of defects in cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2009;
34
90-97
-
6
Wang C B, Chiu W W, Lee C Y, Sun Y L, Lin Y H, Tseng C J.
Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2009;
34
85-89
-
7
Rotas M A, Haberman S, Levgur M.
Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management.
Obstet Gynecol.
2006;
107
1373-1381
-
8
O'Brien J M, Barton J R, Donaldson E S.
The management of placenta percreta: conservative and operative strategies.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1996;
175
1632-1638
-
9
Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F.
The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity.
Obstet Gynecol.
2002;
99
976-980
-
10
Boyle R K, Waters B A, O'Rourke P K.
Blood transfusion for caesarean delivery complicated by placenta praevia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.
2009;
49
627-630
-
11
Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, Phillippe H J, Nisand I.
Ultrasonographic measurement of lower uterine segment to assess risk of defects of scarred uterus.
Lancet.
1996;
347
281-284
-
12
Pollio F, Staibano S, Mascolo M et al..
Uterine dehiscence in term pregnant patients with one previous cesarean delivery: growth factor immunoexpression and collagen content in the scarred lower uterine segment.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2006;
194
527-534
-
13
Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, Brunet S, Gauthier R J.
Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2009;
201
320, e1-e6
-
14
Hodde J, Janis A, Ernst D, Zopf D, Sherman D, Johnson C.
Effects of sterilization on an extracellular matrix scaffold: part I. Composition and matrix architecture.
J Mater Sci Mater Med.
2007;
18
537-543
-
15
Hiles M, Record Ritchie R D, Altizer A M.
Are biologic grafts effective for hernia repair? A systematic review of the literature.
Surg Innov.
2009;
16
26-37
-
16
Sung V W, Rogers R G, Schaffer J I Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group et al.
Graft use in transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair: a systematic review.
Obstet Gynecol.
2008;
112
1131-1142
-
17
Alperin M, Feola A, Meyn L, Duerr R, Abramowitch S, Moalli P.
Collagen scaffold: a treatment for simulated maternal birth injury in the rat model.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2010;
202
589, e1-e8
-
18
Jernigan T W, Croce M A, Cagiannos C, Shell D H, Handorf C R, Fabian T C.
Small intestinal submucosa for vascular reconstruction in the presence of gastrointestinal contamination.
Ann Surg.
2004;
239
733-738
discussion 738-740
-
19
Franklin Jr M E, Treviño J M, Portillo G, Vela I, Glass J L, González J J.
The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic material for laparoscopic hernia repair in infected and potentially contaminated fields: long-term follow-up.
Surg Endosc.
2008;
22
1941-1946
-
20
Hodde J.
Extracellular matrix as a bioactive material for soft tissue reconstruction.
ANZ J Surg.
2006;
76
1096-1100
-
21
Badylak S, Kokini K, Tullius B, Whitson B.
Strength over time of a resorbable bioscaffold for body wall repair in a dog model.
J Surg Res.
2001;
99
282-287
-
22
Stamilio D M, DeFranco E, Paré E et al..
Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Obstet Gynecol.
2007;
110
1075-1082
-
23
Bujold E, Gauthier R J.
Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months.
Obstet Gynecol.
2010;
115
1003-1006
-
24
Hamar B D, Saber S B, Cackovic M et al..
Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure.
Obstet Gynecol.
2007;
110
808-813
-
25
Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, Aygün M, Savan K.
Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable?.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.
2006;
124
32-36
-
26
Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T et al..
Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
2006;
85
429-434
-
27
Dodd J M, Anderson E R, Gates S.
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2008;
(3)
CD004732
-
28
Chang Y, Tsai E M, Long C Y, Lee C L, Kay N.
Resectoscopic treatment combined with sonohysterographic evaluation of women with postmenstrual bleeding as a result of previous cesarean delivery scar defects.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2009;
200
370, e1-e4
-
29
Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E.
Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol.
2008;
15
172-175
John M O'BrienM.D.
Director, Maternal Fetal Medicine
University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536
Email: john.obrien2@uky.edu