Exchange of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters is Associated with an Increased Risk for Bloodstream Infection

ABSTRACT

It is not uncommon that the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) needs to be replaced either due to blockage or migration to a peripheral position. In such circumstances, there are two methods of PICC placement: new-site insertion and exchange by using the old PICC as a guide wire. Our objective was to investigate risk of infection associated with the exchange method. In this retrospective study, data on all PICC insertions in the neonatal intensive care unit in 2004 to 2008 were obtained. In the population who needed removal of existing PICC and insertion of a new one, we compared central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) within 1 week of insertion between the two insertion methods. Of 1148 PICC insertions reviewed, 164 (103 new-site and 61 exchange insertions) were performed after removal of a blocked/malpositioned PICC and therefore comprised the study population. The rate of CLABSI was higher in the exchange method (9.8% versus 1%, p < 0.007). After adjusting for the confounders, the odds for CLABSI within 7 days of PICC insertion was higher with the exchange method (odds ratio 25.2, 95% confidence interval: 2.17 to 292.98; p = 0.01). In infants, insertion of PICCs using the exchange method carries an increased risk of bloodstream infection.

KEYWORDS

Catheter - neonate - preterm - sepsis

REFERENCES

• 1 Ramasethu J. Complications of vascular catheters in the neonatal intensive care unit.  Clin Perinatol. 2008;  35 199-222, x
• 2 Maas A, Flament P, Pardou A, Deplano A, Dramaix M, Struelens M J. Central venous catheter-related bacteraemia in critically ill neonates: risk factors and impact of a prevention programme.  J Hosp Infect. 1998;  40 211-224
• 3 Aly H, Herson V, Duncan A et al.. Is bloodstream infection preventable among premature infants? A tale of two cities.  Pediatrics. 2005;  115 1513-1518
• 4 Borghesi A, Stronati M. Strategies for the prevention of hospital-acquired infections in the neonatal intensive care unit.  J Hosp Infect. 2008;  68 293-300
• 5 Stoll B J, Gordon T, Korones S B et al.. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.  J Pediatr. 1996;  129 63-71
• 6 Stoll B J, Hansen N I, Adams-Chapman I National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection.  JAMA. 2004;  292 2357-2365
• 7 Nadroo A M, Glass R B, Lin J, Green R S, Holzman I R. Changes in upper extremity position cause migration of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates.  Pediatrics. 2002;  110 (1 Pt 1) 131-136
• 8 Connolly B, Amaral J, Walsh S, Temple M, Chait P, Stephens D. Influence of arm movement on central tip location of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).  Pediatr Radiol. 2006;  36 845-850
• 9 Racadio J M, Doellman D A, Johnson N D, Bean J A, Jacobs B R. Pediatric peripherally inserted central catheters: complication rates related to catheter tip location.  Pediatrics. 2001;  107 E28
• 10 Gustafson R. Best practice for the care and maintenance of ARGYLE® neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters. In: Kendall, ed. ARGYLE Neonatal-Pediatric PICCs Manual. Chicopee, MA: Tyco Healthcare Group LP; 2005
• 11 Cook D, Randolph A, Kernerman P et al.. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature.  Crit Care Med. 1997;  25 1417-1424
• 12 Safdar N, Kluger D M, Maki D G. A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies.  Medicine (Baltimore). 2002;  81 466-479
• 13 Stenzel J P, Green T P, Fuhrman B P, Carlson P E, Marchessault R P. Percutaneous central venous catheterization in a pediatric intensive care unit: a survival analysis of complications.  Crit Care Med. 1989;  17 984-988
• 14 Kline A M. Pediatric catheter-related bloodstream infections: latest strategies to decrease risk.  AACN Clin Issues. 2005;  16 185-198 quiz 272-274
• 15 Mahieu L M, De Dooy J J, Lenaerts A E, Ieven M M, De Muynck A O. Catheter manipulations and the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients.  J Hosp Infect. 2001;  48 20-26
• 16 Michel L A, Bradpiece H A, Randour P, Pouthier F. Safety of central venous catheter change over guidewire for suspected catheter-related sepsis. A prospective randomized trial.  Int Surg. 1988;  73 180-186
• 17 Eyer S, Brummitt C, Crossley K, Siegel R, Cerra F. Catheter-related sepsis: prospective, randomized study of three methods of long-term catheter maintenance.  Crit Care Med. 1990;  18 1073-1079
• 18 Kowalewska-Grochowska K, Richards R, Moysa G L, Lam K, Costerton J W, King E G. Guidewire catheter change in central venous catheter biofilm formation in a burn population.  Chest. 1991;  100 1090-1095
• 19 Cobb D K, High K P, Sawyer R G et al.. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters.  N Engl J Med. 1992;  327 1062-1068
• 20 O'Grady N P, Alexander M, Dellinger E P et al.. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S  Pediatrics. 2002;  110 e51
• 21 van den Hoogen A, Brouwer M J, Gerards L J, Fleer A, Krediet T G. Removal of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters in neonates is associated with the occurrence of sepsis.  Acta Paediatr. 2008;  97 1250-1252