Endoscopic transesophageal vs. thoracoscopic removal of mediastinal lymph nodes: a prospective randomized trial in a long term animal survival model

Background and study aims: In cases where biopsies remain inconclusive, removal of mediastinal lymph nodes for further analysis requires surgical means. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures allow incision/closure of the gut wall, which might enable endoscopic excision of pre-marked nodes. The aims of the current study were to investigate the feasibility, safety, and reproducibility of lymph node generation in an animal model to enable endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) lymph node removal (ELR) using transesophageal NOTES access/closure and to compare this procedure with thoracoscopic lymph node removal (TLR) in a randomized long term survival animal study.

Patients and methods: Lymph node creation using graphite injection was performed in 12 pigs. After randomization into ELR and TLR groups, lymph nodes were marked with newly developed anchors under EUS guidance and removed using either ELR or TLR. ELR included incision of the esophageal wall and closure after lymph node removal. The main outcome measures were success in lymph node generation, technical success of lymph node removal, complications, and comparability of ELR and TLR.

Results: Generation of lymph nodes proved successful in all animals in 46 /48 sites injected (96 %). Anchors were placed through the selected nodes in a mean of 9.4 minutes. TLR and ELR were successful in all cases. One bleeding occurred during esophageal incision in ELR, which was stopped endoscopically. After lymph node removal, endoscopic suturing of the incision took a mean of 18 minutes. Procedure time was longer for ELR than TLR (mean 48 vs. 42 minutes). All animals survived the procedures. Autopsy after 4 weeks showed two thoracic wall abscesses in the TLR group and none in the ELR group. Microscopic analysis revealed well healed esophageal scars.

Conclusion: ELR proved to be feasible in this limited sample size and complications were not observed more frequently in this group than in the TLR group.

• References

• 1 Salinas G, Saavedra L, Agurto H et al Early experience in human hybrid transgastric and transvaginal endoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1092-1098
• 2 Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Allemann P et al Transgastric hybrid cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1162-1166
• 3 Auyang ED, Hungness ES, Vaziri K et al Human NOTES cholecystectomy: transgastric hybrid technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2009; 13: 1149-1150
• 4 Navarra G, La Malfa G, Lazzara S et al SILS and NOTES cholecystectomy: a tailored approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 511-514
• 5 Fritscher-Ravens A, Cuming T, Jacobsen B et al Feasibility and safety of endoscopic full-thickness esophageal wall resection and defect closure: a prospective long-term survival animal study. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1314-1320
• 6 Fritscher-Ravens A, Cuming T, Eisenberger CF et al Randomized comparative long-term survival study of endoscopic and thoracoscopic esophageal wall repair after NOTES mediastinoscopy in healthy and compromised animals. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 468-474
• 7 Willingham FF, Gee DW, Lauwers GY et al Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1042-1047
• 8 Perretta S, Allemann P, Dallemagne B, Marescaux J. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for neoplasia of the chest and mediastinum. Surg Oncol 2009; 18: 177-180
• 9 Krasna MJ, Deshmukh S, McLaughlin JS. Complications of thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 1066-1069
• 10 Vallböhmer D, Hölscher AH, Brabender J et al Thoracoscopic enucleation of esophageal leiomyomas: a feasible and safe procedure. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1097-1099
• 11 von Rahden BHA, Stein HJ, Feussner H, Siewert JR. Enucleation of submucosal tumors of the esophagus: minimally-invasive versus open approach. Surgical Endoscopy 2004; 18: 924-930
• 12 Kent M, d’Amato T, Nordman C et al Minimally invasive resection of benign esophageal tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 134: 176-181
• 13 Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 16: 2152-2165
• 14 Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Ikeda K, Swain P. Endoscopic transgastric lymphadenectomy using endoscopic ultrasound for selection and guidance. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 302-306
• 15 Fritscher-Ravens A, Mosse CA, Mills TN et al A through the scope device for suturing and tissue approximation under endoscopic ultrasound control. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 737-742
• 16 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Cuming T et al. Comparative study of NOTES alone vs. EUS-guided NOTES procedures. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 925-930
• 17 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Holland C et al Beyond NOTES: randomized controlled study of different methods of flexible endoscopic hemostasis of artificially induced hemorrhage, via NOTES access to the peritoneal cavity. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 29-35
• 18 Fritscher-Ravens A, Hampe J, Grange P et al Clip closure vs endoscopic suturing vs thoracoscopic repair of an iatrogenic esophageal perforation: a randomized comparative long term survival study in a porcine model. Gatrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1020-1026
• 19 Cahill RA, Asakuma M, Perretta S et al Supplementation of endoscopic submucosal dissection with sentinel node biopsy performed by natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1152-1160
• 20 Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Yu Ngo DK et al Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection in management of superficial squamous esophageal neoplasms outside Japan. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 190-194
• 21 Wang KK, Prasad G, Tian J. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in esophageal and gastric cancers. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2010; 26: 453-458
• 22 Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Masao H et al Endoscopic submucosal dissection is superior to conventional endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for early squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 255-264
• 23 Annema JT, van Meerbeeck JP, Rintoul RC et al Mediastinoscopy vs endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2010; 304: 2245-2252
• 24 Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Eloubeidi MA. Routine mediastinoscopy and esophageal ultrasound fine-needle aspiration in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are clinically N2 negative: a prospective study. Chest 2006; 130: 1791-1795
• 25 Hürtgen M, Friedel G, Witte B et al Systematic video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA). Thorac Surg Sci 2005; 9: 2 Doc02
• 26 Witte B, Messerschmidt A, Hillebrand H et al Combined videothoracoscopic and videomediastinoscopic approach improves radicality of minimally invasive mediastinal lymphadenectomy for early stage lung carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 343-347
• 27 Park PO, Bergström M. Transgastric peritoneoscopy and appendectomy: thoughts on our first experience in humans. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 81-84
• 28 Hampe J, Schniewind B, Both M, Fritscher-Ravens A. Use of a NOTES closure device for full-thickness suturing of a postoperative anastomotic esophageal leakage. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 595-598
• 29 Raju GS, Fritscher-Ravens A, Rothstein RI et al Endoscopic closure of colon perforation compared to surgery in a porcine model: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 324-332
• 30 Turner BG, Gee DW, Cizginer S et al Endoscopic transesophageal mediastinal lymph node dissection and en bloc resection by using mediastinal and thoracic approaches (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 831-835