Endoscopy 2011; 43(10): 849-855
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256650
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diagnostic yield of a novel jumbo biopsy “unroofing” technique for tissue acquisition of gastric submucosal masses

S. Komanduri
1   Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
,
L. Keefer
2   Center for Psychosocial Research, Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
,
S. Jakate
3   Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 07 October 2010

accepted after revision 15 May 2011

Publication Date:
10 August 2011 (online)

Background and study aims: Adequate tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of gastric submucosal masses (GSMs) has been challen ging for gastroenterologists. The use of standard biopsy forceps generally recovers non-diagnostic overlying mucosa. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) provides a significant improvement, but is often still inadequate for diagnosis. The aim of the current study was to assess the efficacy of a novel jumbo biopsy unroofing technique (JUT) for tissue acquisition in GSM.

Patients and methods: This prospective study recruited patients who were referred for EUS for the evaluation of GSM between 2006 and 2009. All patients underwent EUS with FNA when feasible followed by JUT. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield of JUT.

Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled, 72 of whom were included in the investigation; 16 patients were excluded with no evidence of a submucosal mass or extrinsic compression, and five patients were further excluded by pathology confirming mucosal lesions. Of the 72 jumbo biopsies 66 (92%) provided diagnostic tissue without significant complications and 42 (58%) had lesions amenable to FNA. Although 34 of the 42 lesions were deemed adequate at the time of on-site cytological evaluation, only 28 (67%) provided sufficient tissue for final diagnosis. More importantly, only 37/72 (52%) of all patients had lesions that required any further intervention.

Conclusions: Utilization of JUT is safe and effective for diagnosis of GSM. The data suggest that the jumbo biopsy unroofing technique should be considered as an initial diagnostic strategy for GSMs found during upper endoscopy.

 
  • References

  • 1 Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Wetterberg P. Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy. Surg Endosc 1991; 5: 20-23
  • 2 Hwang JH, Rulyak SD, Kimmey MB. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 2217-2228
  • 3 Hunt GC, Smith PP, Faigel DO. Yield of tissue sampling for submucosal lesions evaluated by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 68-72
  • 4 Cantor MJ, Davila RE, Faigel DO. Yield of tissue sampling for subepithelial lesions evaluated by EUS: a comparison between forceps biopsies and endoscopic submucosal resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 29-34
  • 5 Ji JS, Lee BI, Choi KY et al Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions. Korean J Intern Med 2009; 24: 101-105
  • 6 Hoda KM, Rodriguez SA, Faigel DO. EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1218-1223
  • 7 Fernandez-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Sole M et al Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 292-299
  • 8 Sepe PS, Moparty B, Pitman MB et al EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 254-261
  • 9 Vander Noot MR, Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK et al Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer 2004; 102: 157-163
  • 10 Komanduri S, Swanson G, Keefer L et al Use of a new jumbo forceps improves tissue acquisition of Barrett’s esophagus surveillance biopsies. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1072-1078 e1
  • 11 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A et al Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41: 1149-1160
  • 12 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG et al G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175-191
  • 13 Zhou XD, Lv NH, Chen HX. Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumor. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 4897-4902
  • 14 Grubel P. Keyhole biopsy: an easy and better alternative to fine-needle aspiration or Tru-cut biopsy of submucosal gastrointestinal tumors. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 685 ; author reply 685
  • 15 Lee CK, Chung IK, Lee SH et al Endoscopic partial resection with the unroofing technique for reliable tissue diagnosis of upper GI subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria on EUS (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 188-194
  • 16 Karita M, Tada M. Endoscopic and histologic diagnosis of submucosal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract using combined strip biopsy and bite biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 1994; 40: 749-753
  • 17 Sun S, Jin Y, Chang G et al Endoscopic band ligation without electrosurgery: a new technique for excision of small upper-GI leiomyoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 218-222
  • 18 Polkowski M, Gerke W, Jarosz D et al Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided trucut [corrected] biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 329-334
  • 19 Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE et al Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 300-305
  • 20 Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Matsui N et al Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 2077-2082
  • 21 Turhan N, Aydog G, Ozin Y et al Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective study of 50 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2010; DOI: 10.1002/dc.21464
  • 22 Yoshida S, Yamashita K, Yokozawa M et al Diagnostic findings of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: proposal of a combined cytology with newly defined features and histology diagnosis. Pathol Int 2009; 59: 712-719
  • 23 Mekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki A et al Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 913-919
  • 24 Chen VK, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of intramural and extraintestinal mass lesions: diagnostic accuracy, complication assessment, and impact on management. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 984-989
  • 25 Polkowski M, Bergman JJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy for submucosal tumors: needless needling. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 324-326