Endoscopy 2011; 43(9): 766-770
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256473
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Risk of hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis after double-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective study

S.  Zepeda-Gómez1 , R.  Barreto-Zuñiga1 , S.  Ponce-de-León2 , A.  Meixueiro-Daza1 , J.  A.  Herrera-López1 , J.  Camacho1 , F.  Tellez-Avila1 , F.  Valdovinos-Andraca1 , F.  Vargas-Vorackova3
  • 1Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 2Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 31 August 2010

accepted after revision 27 March 2011

Publication Date:
30 May 2011 (online)

Background and study aims: There have been reports, mainly retrospective, of pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia after anterograde double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). Our aim was to report the incidence of pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia after DBE and investigate possible risk factors associated with its occurrence.

Patients and methods: In this single-center prospective cohort study, serum samples were taken for amylase and lipase before and 3 hours after anterograde DBE in consecutive patients. Multiple variables were recorded, including total procedure time, insertion depth, and number of passes. Patients were evaluated to 24 hours later for signs of pancreatitis. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of hyperamylasemia and pancreatitis.

Results: 92 patients were included in the analysis (58 women, 34 men; mean age 54 years, range 18 – 89). The mean total procedure time was 62 minutes (range 30 – 120). The mean post-procedure amylase and lipase levels were significantly higher in comparison with the baseline levels (165 U/L vs. 69 U/L and 144 U/L vs. 28 U/L respectively, P < .05); 36 patients (39 %) showed hyperamylasemia after the procedure and three patients developed acute mild pancreatitis. Hyperamylasemia was associated more frequently with procedure duration greater than 60 minutes (P < .001) and insertion depth greater than 250 cm (P < .013).

Conclusions: The incidence of hyperamylasemia after anterograde DBE is common and particularly associated with longer procedure time and insertion depth. The cumulative incidence of pancreatitis was 3 %. We recommend the avoidance of both unnecessarily lengthy procedures and deep insertion distances in patients who undergo anterograde DBE.

References

  • 1 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
  • 2 Yamamoto H, Sugano K. A new method of enteroscopy – the double-balloon method.  Can J Gastroenterol. 2003;  17 273-274
  • 3 Pohl J, Blancas J M, Cave D et al. Consensus report of the 2nd International Conference on double-balloon endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 156-160
  • 4 Yamamoto H, Binmoeller K. Double-balloon endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 779-783
  • 5 May A. Current status of double-balloon enteroscopy with focus on the Weisbaden results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 S12-S14
  • 6 Kopacova M, Rejchrt S, Tacheci I et al. Hyperamylasemia of uncertain significance associated with oral double-balloon enteroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 1133-1138
  • 7 Aktas H, Mensink P BF, Haringsma J et al. Low incidence of hyperamylasemia after proximal double-ballon enteroscopy: has the insertion technique improved?.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 670-673
  • 8 Freeman M, Guda N. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 845-864
  • 9 di Caro S, May A, Heine D et al. The European experience with double balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety and clinical impact.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 545-550
  • 10 Honda K, Mizutani T, Nakamura K et al. Acute pancreatitis associated with peroral double-balloon enteroscopy: A case report.  World J Gastroenterol. 2006;  12 1802-1804
  • 11 Groenen M, Moreels T, Orlent H et al. Acute pancreatitis after double-balloon enteroscopy: an old pathogenetic theory revisited as a result of using a new endoscopic tool.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 82-85
  • 12 Heine G, Hadithi M, Groenen M et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 42-48
  • 13 Mensink P, Haringsma J, Kucharzik T et al. Complications of double-balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 613-615
  • 14 Tanaka S, Mitsui K, Tatsuguchi A et al. Current status of double-balloon endoscopy-indications, insertion route, sedation, complications, technical matters.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 30-33
  • 15 Jarbandhan S, van Weyenberg S, van der Veer W et al. Double-balloon endoscopy associated pancreatitis: a description of six cases.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 720-724
  • 16 Honda K, Itaba S, Mizutani T et al. An increase in the serum amylase level in patients after peroral double-balloon enteroscopy: an association with the development of pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1040-1043
  • 17 Lo S K, Simpson P. Pancreatitis associated with double-balloon enteroscopy: how common is it?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  1139-1141
  • 18 Carmona-Sánchez R, Uscanga L, Bezaury-Rivas P et al. Potential harmful effect of iodinated intravenous contrast medium on the clinical course of mild acute pancreatitis.  Arch Surg. 2000;  135 1280-1284

S. Zepeda-GómezMD 

Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán”

Vasco de Quiroga 15
Tlalpan, C.P. 14000
Mexico City
Mexico

Fax: +52-55-54870900

Email: sergiozepeda@medscape.com

    >