Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245447
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Komplikationen nach posteriorer lamellärer Keratoplastik (DSAEK): Vermeiden, Erkennen und Behandeln
Complications after Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DSAEK): Prevention, Detection and TreatmentPublication History
Eingegangen: 19.1.2010
Angenommen: 26.4.2010
Publication Date:
17 June 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastiktechniken, wie die Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK), nehmen zunehmend Einzug in die klinische Routine. Ziel der Arbeit ist es, typische Komplikationen nach DSAEK, deren Management sowie Strategien zur Vermeidung darzustellen. Methoden: Literaturübersicht aus PUBMED und eigene klinische Ergebnisse. Ergebnisse: Die postoperative Flapdislokation, die mit erneuter Luftfüllung der Vorderkammer behandelt werden kann, ist die häufigste und typischste Komplikation nach DSAEK (10 – 30 % der Patienten). Schlussfolgerung: Eine sorgfältige Indikationsstellung, Operationstechnik und Nachsorge können die DSAEK zu einem relativ sicheren und effektiven Therapieverfahren bei endothelialen Hornhauterkrankungen machen.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to outline typical complications after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and to discuss their prevention and management. Methods: Our own clinical results and PUBMED literature search were evaluated. Results: Postoperative flap dislocation, which can be effectively treated by re-bubbling the graft, is the most common and typical complication after DSAEK. Conclusions: Careful preoperative indication, surgery and postoperative care make DSAEK a safe and effective new therapeutic option for patients with endothelial corneal disease.
Schlüsselwörter
Kornea - Katarakt - Bindehaut - posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik - DSAEK - DMEK
Key words
cornea - conjunctiva - cataract - posterior lamellar keratoplasty - DSAEK - DMEK
Literatur
- 1
Cursiefen C, Küchle M, Naumann G OH.
Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1250 corneal
buttons.
Cornea.
1998;
17
468-470
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Price F W, Price M O.
Does endothelial cell survival differ between DSEK and standard PK?.
Ophthalmology.
2009;
116
367-368
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Das Jr S, Langenbucher A, Jacobi C et al.
Long-term refractive and visual outcome after penetrating keratoplasty only versus
the triple procedure in Fuchs’ dystrophy.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2006;
244
1089-1095
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Bachmann B O, Pogorelov P, Kruse F E et al.
Patientenzufriedenheit nach posteriorer lamellärer Keratoplastik (DSAEK).
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd.
2008;
225
577-581
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Levinger E et al.
Retrospective contralateral study comparing descemet stripping automated endothelial
keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty.
Cornea.
2009;
28
485-488
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Gorovoy M S.
Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.
Cornea.
2006;
25
886-889
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Heindl L M, Hofmann-Rummelt C, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U et al.
Histologic analysis of descemet stripping in posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Arch Ophthalmol.
2008;
126
461-464
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Melles G R, Eggink F A, Lander F et al.
A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Cornea.
1998;
17
618-626
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Busin M, Arffa R C, Sebastiani A.
Endokeratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty for the surgical treatment
of diseased endothelium: initial results.
Ophthalmology.
2000;
107
2077-2082
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Cursiefen C, Kruse F E.
Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (DSAEK).
Ophthalmologe.
2009;
106
939-952
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Terry M A, Shamie N, Chen E S et al.
Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs’ dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical
results with the new triple procedure.
Ophthalmology.
2009;
116
631-639
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Ousley P J, Terry M A.
Stability of vision, topography, and endothelial cell density from 1 year to 2 years
after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty surgery.
Ophthalmology.
2005;
112
50-57
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Pogorelov P, Cursiefen C, Bachmann B O et al.
Changes in donor corneal lenticule thickness after Descemet’s stripping automated
endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with organ-cultured corneas.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2009;
93
825-829
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Price M O, Price F W.
Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected
and manually dissected donor tissue.
Ophthalmology.
2006;
113
1936-1942
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Price M O, Jordan C S, Moore Jr G et al.
Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part
two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2009;
93
391-395
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Terry M A.
Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar
endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc.
2007;
105
530-563
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Terry M A, Ousley P J.
Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty: visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial
survival in a large prospective series.
Ophthalmology.
2005;
112
1541-1548
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Cursiefen C, Kruse F E.
Posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (DSAEK).
Ophthalmologe.
2008;
105
183-190
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Anshu A, Chee S P, Mehta J S et al.
Cytomegalovirus endotheliitis in Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty.
Ophthalmology.
2009;
116
624-630
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Jordan C S, Price M O, Trespalacios R et al.
Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part
one: clinical signs and symptoms.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2009;
93
387-390
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Nguyen N X, Seitz B, Martus P et al.
Long-term topical steroid treatment improves graft survival following normal-risk
penetrating keratoplasty.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2007;
144
318-319
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Melles G R, Ong T S, Ververs B et al.
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
Cornea.
2006;
25
987-990
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Ham L, Balachandran C, Verschoor C A et al.
Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated descemet membrane transplantation: descemet
membrane endothelial keratoplasty.
Arch Ophthalmol.
2009;
127
252-255
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Bachmann B, Laaser K, Cursiefen C et al.
A new method for correct orientation of Descemet membrane during DMEK.
Am J Ophthalmol.
(in press)
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Lam V M, Nguyen N X, Martus P et al.
Surgery-related factors influencing corneal neovascularization after low-risk keratoplasty.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2006;
141
260-266
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Ide T, Yoo S H, Kymionis G D et al.
Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK): effect of nontoxic
gentian violet marking pen on DSAEK donor tissue viability by using vital dye assay.
Cornea.
2008;
27
562-564
MissingFormLabel
PD Dr. Claus Cursiefen
Augenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen
91054 Erlangen
Phone: ++ 49/91 31/8 53 30 01
Fax: ++ 49/91 31/8 53 64 01
Email: ccursiefen@yahoo.com