Specific Volume of Female Subcutaneous Abdominal Tissue as a Reference in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

Use of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is gaining popularity as the method of choice for breast reconstruction and replacement of prosthetic breast implants. Ideally, the volume of the prosthesis is replaced by the same volume of autologous tissue to restore shape and symmetry. Still, intraoperative tissue volumetry is not practical under sterile circumstances. The first step toward a clinical intraoperative measure for volume matching would be to acquire knowledge of the specific density of female subcutaneous abdominal fat tissue. The weight and volume of abdominoplasty specimens from 32 women were measured. From these data, the specific volume of DIEP flap tissue was calculated. The mean specific density was 1.12 mL/g (range, 1.02 to 1.32 mL/g; standard deviation 0.04). An approximate volume-to-weight conversion multiplier of 1.1 may serve as an intraoperative tool to estimate the volume of a DIEP flap from its weight.

KEYWORDS

Fat specific volume - density - DIEP flap - breast reconstruction

REFERENCES

• 1 Nahabedian M Y, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson P N. Breast reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 466-475 discussion 476-477
• 2 Garvey P B, Buchel E W, Pockaj B A et al.. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117 1711-1719 discussion 1720-1721
• 3 Amir A, Silfen R, Hauben D J. Use of Archimedes' law for measuring the volume of the TRAM flap in immediate breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  103 1329
• 4 Lazarus D, Hudson D A. A simple method for determining the weight of the TRAM flap intraoperatively at the time of breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 818-822
• 5 Kanaley J A, Sames C, Swisher L et al.. Abdominal fat distribution in pre- and postmenopausal women: the impact of physical activity, age, and menopausal status.  Metabolism. 2001;  50 976-982
• 6 Kanaley J A, Giannopoulou I, Tillapaugh-Fay G, Nappi J S, Ploutz-Snyder L L. Racial differences in subcutaneous and visceral fat distribution in postmenopausal black and white women.  Metabolism. 2003;  52 186-191
• 7 Ross R, Shaw K D, Rissanen J, Martel Y, de Guise J, Avruch L. Sex differences in lean and adipose tissue distribution by magnetic resonance imaging: anthropometric relationships.  Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;  59 1277-1285
• 8 Allen T H, Krzywicki H J, Roberts J E. Density, fat, water and solids in freshly isolated tissues.  J Appl Physiol. 1959;  14 1005-1008
• 9 Fidanza F, Keys A, Anderson J T. Density of body fat in man and other mammals.  J Appl Physiol. 1953;  6 252-256
• 10 Fidanza F. Body fat in adult man: semicentenary of fat density and skinfolds.  Acta Diabetol. 2003;  40(Suppl 1) S242-S245
• 11 Martin A D, Daniel M Z, Drinkwater D T, Clarys J P. Adipose tissue density, estimated adipose lipid fraction and whole body adiposity in male cadavers.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994;  18 79-83
• 12 Vandeweyer E, Hertens D. Quantification of glands and fat in breast tissue: an experimental determination.  Ann Anat. 2002;  184 181-184
• 13 Kanaley J A, Giannopoulou I, Ploutz-Snyder L L. Regional differences in abdominal fat loss.  Int J Obes (Lond). 2007;  31 147-152
• 14 Löfgren P, Hoffstedt J, Rydén M et al.. Major gender differences in the lipolytic capacity of abdominal subcutaneous fat cells in obesity observed before and after long-term weight reduction.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;  87 764-771
• 15 Wirth A, Steinmetz B. Gender differences in changes in subcutaneous and intra-abdominal fat during weight reduction: an ultrasound study.  Obes Res. 1998;  6 393-399
• 16 Ross R, Léger L, Marliss E B, Morris D V, Gougeon R. Adipose tissue distribution changes during rapid weight loss in obese adults.  Int J Obes. 1991;  15 733-739
• 17 Salans L B, Cushman S W, Weismann R E. Studies of human adipose tissue. Adipose cell size and number in nonobese and obese patients.  J Clin Invest. 1973;  52 929-941