ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of information provided by medical
practitioners to families regarding the efficacy and limitations of prophylaxis with
palivizumab for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in infants. A single-question
survey was distributed to medical practitioners who described themselves as having
both prescribed palivizumab for infants and discussed the effects of the drug with
families. Responses were anonymous and returned immediately after reviewing the survey
question. Respondents were requested to choose the answer that most closely resembled
their understanding of palivizumab effects on the degree of illness and severity of
RSV infection. All surveys distributed were completed and answers assessed by medical
specialty. A total of 456 surveys were returned. Neonatologists and pediatricians
accounted for the majority of responses. The answer that most closely reflects the
medical literature, that palivizumab will decrease hospitalization but have no effect
on need for mechanical intubation or mortality, was chosen only 2% of the time. Families
are not receiving accurate information regarding the expected potential benefits and
limitations of immunoprophylaxis with palivizumab. This is a very expensive drug with
unclear cost-effectiveness. If changes are to be made to current recommendations as
to use of palivizumab, families must receive informed consent that accurately reflects
the literature.
KEYWORDS
Palivizumab - RSV infection - RSV survey
REFERENCES
- 1
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee of Fetus
and Newborn .
Prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections: indications for the use of palivizumab
and update on the use of RSV-IGIV.
Pediatrics.
1998;
102
1211-1216
- 2
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee on Fetus
and Newborn .
Revised indications for the use of palivizumab and respiratory syncytial virus immune
globulin intravenous for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus infections.
Pediatrics.
2003;
112(6 Pt 1)
1442-1446
- 3 American Academy of Pediatrics .
Respiratory syncytial virus. In: Pickering LK Red Book: 2006 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases,
27th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL; American Academy of Pediatrics 2006: 560-566
- 4
McCarthy C A, Hall C B.
Respiratory syncytial virus: concerns and control.
Pediatr Rev.
2003;
24
301-309
- 5
Leader S, Kohlhase K.
Recent trends in severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) among US infants, 1997 to
2000.
J Pediatr.
2003;
143(5, Suppl)
S127-S132
- 6
Thompson W W, Shay D K, Weintraub E et al..
Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United
States.
JAMA.
2003;
289
179-186
- 7
Kapikian A Z, Mitchell R H, Chanock R M, Shvedoff R A, Stewart C E.
An epidemiologic study of altered clinical reactivity to respiratory syncytial (RS)
virus infection in children previously vaccinated with an inactivated RS virus vaccine.
Am J Epidemiol.
1969;
89
405-421
- 8
Groothuis J R, Simoes E A, Levin M J The Respiratory Syncytial Virus Immune Globulin
Study Group et al.
Prophylactic administration of respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin to high-risk
infants and young children.
N Engl J Med.
1993;
329
1524-1530
- 9
The PREVENT Study Group .
Reduction of respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization among premature infants and
infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia using respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin
prophylaxis.
Pediatrics.
1997;
99
93-99
- 10
The Impact-RSV Study Group .
Palivizumab, a humanized respiratory syncytial virus monoclonal antibody, reduces
hospitalization from respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants.
Pediatrics.
1998;
102
531-537
- 11
Kamal-Bahl S, Doshi J, Campbell J.
Economic analyses of respiratory syncytial virus immumoprophylaxis in high-risk infants:
a systematic review.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2002;
156
1034-1041
- 12
Elhassan N O, Sorbero M ES, Hall C B, Stevens T P, Dick A W.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of palivizumab in premature infants without chronic lung
disease.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2006;
160
1070-1076
- 13
Resch B, Gusenleitner W, Nuijten M J, Lebmeier M, Wittenberg W.
Cost-effectiveness of palivizumab against respiratory syncytial viral infection in
high-risk children in Austria.
Clin Ther.
2008;
30
749-760
- 14 Dunfield L, Mierzwinski-Urban M. Palivizumab prophylaxis against RSV. Canadian
Agency for Drugs & Technologies in Health: Technology report number 80. 2007
- 15
Reeve C A, Whitehall J S, Buettner P G et al..
Cost-effectiveness of respiratory syncytial virus prophylaxis with Palivizumab.
J Paediatr Child Health.
2006;
42
253-258
- 16
Vogel A M, Lennon D R, Broadbent R et al..
Palivizumab prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants.
J Paediatr Child Health.
2002;
38
550-554
- 17
Sharland M, Bedford-Russell A.
Preventing respiratory syncitial virus bronchiolitis.
BMJ.
2001;
322
62-63
- 18
Embleton N D, Harkensee C, Mckean M C.
Palivizumab for preterm infants. Is it worth it?.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed.
2005;
90
F286-F289
- 19
Moler F W.
RSV immune globulin prophylaxis: is an ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure?.
Pediatrics.
1999;
104(3 Pt 1)
559-560
- 20
Klassen T P.
Economic evaluations of immumoprophylaxis in infants at high risk for respiratory
syncytial virus: shedding light or creating confusion?.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2002;
156
1180-1181
Joel H WeinerM.D.
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Department of Neonatology, University of Massachusetts,
U Mass-Memorial Hospital
119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605
eMail: jtteupton@aol.com