Synlett 2009(13): 2188-2190  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1217558
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Synthesis of (+)-9a-epi-Stemoamide via DBU-Catalyzed Michael Addition of Nitroalkane

Peng Gaoa,b, Zhaolong Tonga,1, Hanwei Hua,2, Peng-Fei Xub, Wei Liuc, Chunyan Sunc, Hongbin Zhai*a
a Key Laboratory of Synthetic Chemistry of Natural Substances, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, P. R. of China
b State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry and Department of Chemistry, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, P. R. of China
c State Key Laboratory of Catalytic Material and Reaction Engineering, Research Institute of Petroleum Processing, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, P. R. of China
Fax: +86(21)64166128; e-Mail: zhaih@mail.sioc.ac.cn;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 9 April 2009
Publication Date:
10 July 2009 (online)

Abstract

We describe a practical synthesis of (+)-9a-epi-stemo­amide, which has been achieved in six steps from α,β-unsaturated γ-butyrolactone. The main features of the current approach include a DBU-catalyzed Michael addition of nitroalkane and a reductive lactamization of nitro esters.

    References and Notes

  • 3a Goetz M. Edwards OE. In The Alkaloids   Vol. 9:  Manske RHF. Academic Press; New York: 1976.  p.545 ; and references cited therein
  • 3b Nakanishi K. Goto T. Ito S. Natori S. Nozoe S. In Natural Products Chemistry   Vol. 2:  Academic Press; New York: 1975.  p.292 
  • 4a Jiang R.-W. Hon P.-M. Zhou Y. Chan Y.-M. Xu Y.-T. Xu H.-X. Greger H. Shaw P.-C. But PP.-H. J. Nat. Prod.  2006,  69:  749 
  • 4b Lin L.-G. Zhong Q.-X. Cheng T.-Y. Tang C.-P. Ke C.-Q. Lin G. Ye Y. J. Nat. Prod.  2006,  69:  1051 
  • 5 Lin W.-H. Ye Y. Xu R.-S. J. Nat. Prod.  1992,  55:  571 
  • 6 Kohno Y. Narasaka K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.  1996,  69:  2063 
  • 7a Jacobi PA. Lee K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1997,  119:  3409 
  • 7b Jacobi PA. Lee K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  4295 
  • 8 Williams DR. Reddy JP. Amato GS. Tetrahedron Lett.  1994,  35:  6417 
  • 9a Kinoshita A. Mori M. J. Org. Chem.  1996,  61:  8356 
  • 9b Kinoshita A. Mori M. Heterocycles  1997,  46:  287 
  • 10 Gurjar MK. Reddy DS. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  295 
  • 11 Sibi MP. Subramanian T. Synlett  2004,  1211 
  • 12 Olivo HF. Tovar-Miranda R. Barragán E. J. Org. Chem.  2006,  71:  3287 
  • 13a Bogliotti N. Dalko PI. Cossy J. Synlett  2005,  349 
  • 13b Bogliotti N. Dalko PI. Cossy J. Synlett  2006,  2664 
  • 13c Bogliotti N. Dalko PI. Cossy J. J. Org. Chem.  2006,  71:  9528 
  • 14 Torssell S. Wanngren E. Somfai P. J. Org. Chem.  2007,  72:  4246 
  • 15 Khim S.-K. Schultz AG. J. Org. Chem.  2004,  69:  7734 
  • 16 Yu P. Wang T. Li J. Cook JM. J. Org. Chem.  2000,  65:  3173 
  • 17 Rosso GB. Pilli RA. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  185 
  • For the preparation of ent-(+)-5 {Lit.¹8a [α]D ²5 +31.5 (c 2.00)}, see:
  • 18a Hanessian S. Hodges PJ. Murray PJ. Sahoo SP. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1986,  754 
  • The enantiomer, 5 {[α]D ²5 -32.7 (c 2.4, CHCl3)}, was synthesized in a similar manner¹8a from (R)-tert-butyl[3-(oxiran-2-yl)propoxy]diphenylsilane, an epoxide prepared¹8b-d from l-ascorbic acid:
  • 18b Hubschwerlen C. Synthesis  1986,  962 
  • 18c Sharma GVM. Punna S. Krishna PR. Chorghade MS. Ley SV. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2005,  16:  1125 
  • 18d Brimble MA. Park JH. Taylor CM. Tetrahedron  2003,  59:  5861 
1

Current address: GlaxoSmithKline R&D China, Building No. 3, 898 Halei Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong, Shanghai 201203, P. R. of China.

2

Current address: Department of Chemistry, The University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249-0698, USA.

19

This was performed by following Narasaka’s protocol.6

20

Preparation of New Compounds
Compounds 4: Compound 5 (1.00 g, 2.63 mmol) was mixed with methyl 4-nitrobutanoate (580 mg, 3.94 mmol), and DBU (40 mg, 0.26 mmol) was introduced into the system. The mixture was stirred with no solvent at r.t. for 24 h and concentrated. The residue was chromatographed (PE-EtOAc,­ 5:1) to afford 4 (1.23 g, 89%) as a colorless oil (2:1 epimers). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.05 (s, 9 H), 1.05-1.92 (m, 4 H), 2.01-2.58 (m, 5 H), 2.62-2.84 (m, 2 H), 3.69 (s, 3 H), 3.60-3.79 (m, 2 H), 4.32-4.42 (m, 1 H), 4.58-4.72 (m, 1 H), 7.38-7.42 (m, 6 H), 7.63-7.68 (m, 4 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 19.1, 26.3, 26.8, 28.1, 29.3, 29.4, 30.9, 31.0, 31.6, 31.9, 43.4, 43.5, 52.0, 62.7, 62.8, 80.6, 82.0, 87.7, 88.3, 127.6, 127.6, 129.6, 129.6, 133.5, 133.6, 135.5, 171.9, 172.0, 173.7, 173.8. ESI-MS: m/z (%) = 550 (100) [M + 1], 450 (7). Anal. Calcd for C28H37NO7Si: C, 63.73; H, 7.07; N, 2.65. Found: C, 64.02; H, 7.10; N, 2.62.
Compounds 3: Freshly prepared Raney Ni (ca. 1.20 g) was added to a solution of compound 4 (1.91 g, 3.62 mmol) in MeOH (72 mL). The mixture was hydrogenated under one atmosphere of hydrogen at r.t. for 24 h. After Raney Ni was filtered off, the filtrate was concentrated to give a residue, which was chromatographed (CH2Cl2-MeOH, 30:1) to afford compound 3 (1.455 g, 86%) as a colorless oil (2:1 epimers). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.04 (s, 9 H), 1.60-1.74 (m, 5 H), 2.26-2.40 (m, 5 H), 2.62-2.72 (m, 1 H), 3.64-3.75 (m, 3 H), 4.25-4.38 (m, 1 H), 7.34-7.43 (m, 6 H), 7.60-7.66 (m, 5 H). ¹³C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 19.2, 24.5, 25.2, 26.8, 28.2, 29.8, 30.0, 30.6, 30.7, 31.6, 32.3, 45.3, 45.6, 55.5, 56.2, 63.0, 63.2, 81.9, 82.5, 127.7, 129.7, 133.6, 135.5, 175.3, 178.8, 179.0. ESI-MS: m/z (%) = 520 (13) [M + Na + MeOH], 504 (8) [M + K], 488 (97) [M + Na]. ESI-HRMS: m/z calcd for C27H35NO4SiNa [M + Na]: 488.2233; found: 488.2228. Anal. Calcd for C27H35NO4Si: C, 69.64; H, 7.58; N, 3.01. Found: C, 69.20; H, 7.43; N, 2.89.
Compound 6a: To a stirred solution of compounds 3 (1.30 g, 2.79 mmol) in THF (20 mL), Et3N˙2HF (2.00 mL, 13.9 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred at r.t. for 3 d. NaHCO3 (1.20 g, 14.3 mmol) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 10 min. The solvent was concentrated to give a residue, which was chromatographed (EtOAc-MeOH, 10:1) to afford the epimeric primary alcohols (842 mg) as a pale yellow solid. The alcohols were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL), and then DMAP (34 mg, 0.28 mmol), Et3N (1.20 mL, 8.61 mmol), and MsCl (0.32 mL, 4.18 mmol) were added sequentially. The mixture was stirred at r.t. overnight, neutralized with sat. aq NaHCO3 solution, extracted with CHCl3-i-PrOH (4:1; 3 × 40 mL), dried (Na2SO4), and filtered. The solvents were removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc-MeOH, 4:1) to give the mesylation products. The mesylates were dissolved in THF (50 mL) and added to a stirred suspension of NaH (60%, 1.12 g, 28.0 mmol) in THF (150 mL) at 0 ˚C. After warming to r.t. and stirring for 20 h, the reaction was quenched at 0 ˚C by the addition of sat. aq NH4Cl solution. The mixture was extracted with CHCl3-i-PrOH (4:1), and the combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4). The solvents were removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc-MeOH, 100:1) to afford a mixture of 6a and 6b (252 mg, 43% over the three steps from 3) as a white solid. The ratio of 6a/6b was found to be ca. 5:1 according to the line integrals of the ¹H NMR spectrum. A pure sample of 6a was obtained by careful recrystallization of the 5:1 mixture of 6a/6b from EtOAc-MeOH (100:1).
Analytical Data of Compound 6a: Mp 106-108 ˚C; [α]D ²8 +23.3 (c 0.52, MeOH). ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.58-1.90 (m, 4 H), 2.14-2.53 (m, 6 H), 2.60-2.68 (m, 1 H), 3.13-3.22 (m, 1 H), 3.54 (dd. J = 16.5, 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.78-3.87 (m, 1 H), 4.31-4.41 (m, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 22.1, 24.1, 30.1, 30.4, 32.9, 40.3, 48.5, 60.8, 83.2, 174.0, 174.5. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 209 (31) [M+], 191 (7), 124 (19), 110 (33), 98 (100). HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C11H15NO3 [M+]: 209.1052; found: 209.1047.
Compound 2: To a solution of 6a (22 mg, 0.11 mmol) in anhyd THF (1 mL) at -78 ˚C was added LiHMDS solution in THF (1.0 M, 0.19 mL, 0.19 mmol). After 1 h, MeI (13 µL, 0.21 mmol) was added at -78 ˚C, and the stirring was continued for an additional 1 h. The reaction mixture was quenched with sat. NH4Cl, warmed to r.t., and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic layers were dried (Na2SO4), filtered, and concentrated to give a residue, which was purified by silica gel chromatography (EtOAc-MeOH, 15:1) to furnish 2 (14 mg, 60%) as a white solid: mp 86-88 ˚C; [α]D ²8 +74.9 (c 0.30, MeOH). ¹H NMR (300 MHz CDCl3):
δ = 1.29 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H), 1.62-1.90 (m, 4 H), 2.18-2.56 (m, 5 H), 2.75-2.88 (m, 1 H), 2.98-3.09 (m, 1 H), 3.60-3.69 (m, 1 H), 3.83-3.93 (m, 1 H), 4.52 (dt, J = 10.5, 4.8 Hz, 1 H). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.8, 21.6, 23.2, 30.0, 30.2, 38.4, 40.8, 52.3, 57.8, 80.5, 174.0, 178.0. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 223 (37) [M+], 208 (21), 180 (20), 98 (100). HRMS (EI): m/z calcd for C12H17NO3 [M+]: 223.1208; found: 223.1207.