Endoscopy 2009; 41(12): 1100
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215340
Letters to the editor

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Risky endoscopy for acute aortic dissection with hematemesis

M.  Matsushita, S.  Mori, Y.  Tahashi, K.  Okazaki
  • 1
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
04. Dezember 2009 (online)

Preview

We read with interest the article by Jutaghokiat et al. [1] on unique endoscopic features of gastroduodenal infarction caused by acute aortic dissection. They encountered a patient with severe acute epigastric pain followed by hematemesis who had high blood pressure, tachypnea, tachycardia, and absent bowel sound. After they had identified elevated serum pancreatic enzyme levels, a wide mediastinum, and small-bowel ileus, emergent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) suggested gastroduodenal infarction. Emergent computed tomography (CT) confirmed acute aortic dissection with hepatic and gastrointestinal infarction. Although the patient recovered uneventfully after resection of infracted organs and fenestration of abdominal aorta, we believe that EGD was risky in this patient with several signs of acute aortic dissection.

Acute aortic dissection is a highly lethal medical emergency because these patients are at risk for life-threatening complications [2]. Presentation of acute aortic dissection typically includes chest and/or abdominal pain [3]. Although gastrointestinal symptoms other than abdominal pain are uncommon in such patients, gastrointestinal bleeding, caused by mesenteric infarction, has been described as a dominant symptom [2] [3] [4]. Mesenteric ischemia was reported to be present in 73 / 371 patients (20 %) with aortic dissection [5], and still remains a diagnostic challenge [4]. Because the diagnosis is often difficult and delayed, resulting in high morbidity and mortality, a strong clinical suspicion for mesenteric ischemia and early recognition and treatment may be the only key to preventing a catastrophic outcome in this condition [4].

Angiography has been the criterion standard for the diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia, but it is usually time consuming and not universally available [6]. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as contrast-enhanced CT and multidetector-row CT angiography can effectively detect aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, and ischemic organs [4] [6] [7] [8]. Although Jutaghokiat et al. [1] performed EGD in the patient with severe acute epigastric pain and hematemesis, EGD could precipitate a crisis condition in vulnerable patients because of induction of increased intra-abdominal and blood pressures [9]. CT allows rapid and cost-effective evaluation of patients with acute abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding [4] [8]. Because CT can be performed easily and is in widespread use [6], we believe that patients with acute abdominal pain and hematemesis should initially undergo CT before EGD, and be screened for potentially fatal aortic dissection, especially in patients with high blood pressure, tachycardia, and a wide mediastinum.

Competing interests: None

References

M. MatsushitaMD 

Third Department of Internal Medicine
Kansai Medical University

2-3-1 Shinmachi
Hirakata
Osaka 573-1191
Japan

Fax: +81-72-8042061

eMail: matsumit@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp